Describe Aristotle's teaching about the differences between the final cause and other sorts of causes.

Authors Avatar

Monday 20th October 2003                Emma Ward

  1. Describe Aristotle’s teaching about the differences between the final cause and other sorts of causes (33).

Aristotle had different idea’s, about philosophical knowledge and how we acquire it, to Plato. Aristotle came up with the theory of causality. He believed there was a relationship between cause and effect. He thought each thing or event has more than one “reason” that helps to explain what, why, where and how it is. Aristotle distinguished four causes.

These four causes were the material cause, the efficient cause, the formal cause and the final cause. The final cause is, in Aristotle’s opinion, the most important cause of all. This cause is what and object or some type of “thing” was designed to do or be. It is like the goal, or full development of an individual, or the intended function of a construction or invention.

Join now!

This is completely different from the other three causes. The material cause is the matter out of which a thing is made. Aristotle believed everything has a purpose and this wasn’t enough to make the “thing” what it was designed to do. The efficient cause helps the “thing” to for fill its function. It is the means, which brings something about. It is the source of motion, generation or change. Thirdly, the formal cause, this cause produces the characteristics, which make the “thing” fit into whichever category it fits into. It is the species, kind or type.

An ...

This is a preview of the whole essay