• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the concept of Natural Law with reference to the ideas of Aristotle and Aquinas.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Natural law-Sophie Wright. Aristotle believed that humans have a final cause or purpose. He said this was our supreme good; the ultimate goal which we desire for its own sake and to which all our other goals eventually lead. He believed the human purpose was to reach ?eudaimonia? (happiness) which includes the idea of flourishing and living well. Any object reaches its ultimate purpose by ?performing its function with excellence?. Aristotle considered that the human function is to live a life of reason; this is the highest and most distinctive of all human activities. ?Reason is the true self of every man, since it is the supreme and better part. Reason is, in the highest sense, a mans self.? Humans therefore fulfil their ultimate purpose of eudaimonia by following reason excellently. Aquinas developed Aristotle?s ideas of the human purpose into his own; he was a Christians so therefore believed that humans were created in the ?image of God? thus arguing that the ultimate human purpose was not eudaimonia but perfection. This is the full development of God?s image within us, resulting in union with God. However, we cannot reach this perfection on earth, perfection will be attained in the afterlife and so we must work towards this on earth. Our rational nature sets us apart from everything else in the world and enables us to have a unique relationship with God. ...read more.


Following reason excellently requires us to align our actions and intentions with the purpose for which god created us. As humans never intentionally choose evil (as this goes against our rational nature), Aquinas argued that sin was an error of reason. If someone focuses on ?lesser goods? like wealth or power they lose sight of the ?highest good? (God). In this way reason is enslaved by irrational desires, so we lose sight of our true purpose. We must, therefore, use reason correctly. For this to happen we must set our hearts on God and seek his good will. We must check and supplement natural law with Gods divine law revealed in the bible. St Paul refers to the law that ?God inscribed on the hearts of men? obeying it is thus the equivalent to obeying God?s commands, Aquinas thought that this supports the concept of natural law. Aquinas believed that Gods Eternal Law never changes, it determines the way things such as animals and planets behave and how humans should behave. All things participate in eternal law by the natural tendencies by which they are moved to their ends. Rational beings also participate in eternal law by their knowledge of positive and negative moral precepts, conformity to which leads us towards the end built into us by nature. ...read more.


Yet, Aquinas allowed killing in war as the lesser of two evils, to preserve life. So why not allow killing a foetus to save the mother? And why must we never lie, even if it could save a life? It is unjust to never look into the consequences, what if murdering one person meant the safety of a whole community. The ban on h********l acts also reveals inconsistencies. If these are wrong because they prevent reproduction, Aquinas should not support the celibacy of priests. This ban can be seen as discriminatory and unjust, being based upon Aquinas? preconceived ideas of sexuality. Also science undermines the belief in God creating us as we are, humans evolved by the blind process of natural selection. With no designer, we have no ultimate purpose that we must fulfil. Our natural inclinations are brute facts, not built in guidance as to how we should behave. Although there are some ways in which natural law can lead to just decisions, overall it is unjust because we cannot judge something properly upon just someone actions and intentions as the consequences of these could be completely different to what was intended. The weaknesses in natural law outweigh the strengths because the basis of natural law is god, people no longer believe in God as strongly as they used to so multiple weaknesses have come from that. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the strengths of natural law

    It takes the view that there are common rules that apply to all people in all communities and there for is easy to follow as a rule is a rule and should not be broken. This is very strong strength of natural law and gives a good approach to ethics.

  2. We have consented to be governed so we are obliged to obey the government ...

    Without a new system the segregation would not work in today's life in our country because people have been living this way for too long and any change would lead to drastic consequences such as excessive theft and other crimes.

  1. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    For Aquinas, what is good is God's purpose for us. This is the objective way of determining our purpose. The subjective way is to look at personal fulfilment, which a Christian may well argue can only be achieved by following the objective goal.

  2. Natural law is the most reliable approach when making judgements about sex and relationships. ...

    is also what is believed in the terms of the catholic church. As we can see here again how natural law is in fact the bases for so many of the catholic churches ideas beliefs and teachings. As natural agrees and states that people should be in a marriage before

  1. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    Furthermore, through the ironic contradiction between a blessed anarchy and a benevolent autocracy, the audience is again presented with the paradoxicity of utopian thought as a whole. It can also be argued that Gonzalo's Commonwealth is but a concentrated microimage of the even bigger utopia in The Tempest that is, the play itself.

  2. Explain, with examples, Aquinas' theory or natural law

    This is teleological, as it is interested in our design or 'end'. The primary precepts - preserving life, live in an ordered society, to worship God, to educate the young and to reproduce. Those 5 precepts are teleological: they are the ends to which all our actions should aim.

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    "So it will be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonour, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body."

  2. Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason

    appears relatively rash to the coward and cowardly relative to the rash man? (pg. 21, Aristotle), reiterating the idea that the two extremes have opposing affects. This makes sense when thought of practically. If one individual had found out that a friend had betrayed one?s loyalty then there are two extreme reactions that could occur.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work