Examine and comment on Islamic and Hindu beliefs about life after death

Authors Avatar

Examine and comment on Islamic and Hindu beliefs about life after death

 

Life after death is often a highly charged, debateable topic. Through this essay I will examine the argument that there must be an afterlife to explain morality in this world and refer to The Qur’an for Islam and Bhagavad Gita for Hinduism. This will allow me to conclude that an afterlife can justify morality, as human beings our life’s conduct is dependant on the belief of a good hereafter.

 Both religions very foundation rely on the fact that there is an after life, as deeds in this life will be accountable within the next. Although Islam and Hinduism both believe in an after life they teach radically different things about what it is. The Islamic belief is based on a linear time line, meaning that each person will live on this earth once and after that be judged by God.

“The good and the bad deeds of every person will be weighed.” (Qur’an 7:8).  This view differs with the Hindu belief as their belief is that to attain Mokhsa (release from the cycle of life) “everyone has to be reborn somewhere or the other to undergo some experience, until the Absolute Being is realised as identical with oneself.” by Swami Krishnananda.  The individual must continue to transmigrate between souls to diminish all bad karma in the various lives they had been in to attain complete salvation.

 

Belief in “al- akhirah” (life after death) is so crucial to the Islamic faith that any doubts about it amounts to the denial of Allah (God). This view is shared by the Muslim minority.

 

According to Islamic belief, we have no means of knowing death as a revisiting experience, but Allah (God) has given humanity answers to every question regarding death. The first rhetorical question the Muslim is faced with in the Qur’an is “who will give life to the dead bones?” Islam declares that the Lord will.

 

 In the Qur’an, Allah deepens man’s way of thinking by asking them to reflect on how the rain revives dead earth. “It is Allah Who sends fourth the winds, so that they rise up the clouds, and drive to a land that is dead, and revive the earth therewith after its death…” (Qur’an 35:9)

 

 

According to Islam life on this earth is temporary; it is a preparatory stage for the akhirah (life after death) which will be infinite. Life on this earth is meaningless if good actions are not rewarded and bad conduct not punished. In order for an afterlife to exist, there must be some omnipotent being driving this idea forward.  I will now be referring to Kant’s idea of the universe being satisfied, wrong has to be punished and good rewarded  even if this takes place after death .The moral philosopher, Immanuel Kant argued that morality was the “categorical imperative”. ……“if there is moral law, there must therefore be a law giver.”   

 

 Modern society in alliance with Islamic  and Kantian Views  state that “justice must be served”. An example of this would be if a person commits an offence against humanity he/she has to be imprisoned. We’re then faced with situations  where our justice system has failed  to act with fairness and impartiality in accordance with what is morally right, this is when the idea of “justice in the afterlife”  in religion comes into place.

The current Laws are passed by parliament. The followers of Islam believe the One who determines the rules in this life and delivers the verdict in the after life is the almighty Lord. If we refer back to Kant, that once we die there is an afterlife for the universe to be morally satisfied that good is rewarded and evil is punished, there must be a God who can bring about some sort of Justice.

 “He is who controls the heavens and the earth…” (Holy Qur’an 27:60.)

 To deny God as the moral law Giver is to deny the only reasonable foundation for the law of morality in both the religions, as in Islam the fundamental belief that the almighty God is the basis of all foundation of all belief within that faith, similarly in the contrasting religion   the soul of the individual wishes to have some sort of conclusion in Islam the hereafter and in Hinduism salvation to become one with the creator Brahma. However the factor that differs the two religions is that the concept of the soul, within the religions. In Islam the soul has its own identity of the individual it was given to at the moment of conception it has no relation to its creator other then the fact that the lord was the one who blessed life into it and the soul will be obedient to its creator to the day of judgement. The concept in Hinduism contradicts this idea as it feels the soul is God in itself as it has to go through a process which will enable the spiritual self to become God himself over the process of time. If justice is not done on earth therefore there must be an after life. The concept of free will argues that humanity has been given guidelines by God. It is up to individuals whether they follow them or not. Some may then argue that God does not care about people as He allows suffering to take place. This is where justice in the hereafter is satisfied, and so that is why there is morality in this world. 

Join now!

“For Muslims not to care about life after death is a serious failing”. Muslims are certain that people die. Doubts have been expressed by non Muslims regarding life after death. They question how Allah (God) can raise men and women after death, but Islam teaches that God can make human beings out of nothing so it is not difficult for Him to raise them again. 

“O mankind! If you are in any doubt about the resurrection, then verily, we have created you (i.e. Adam).”    (Qur’an 22:5)

The Qur’an goes on further to say that:

“Does man think ...

This is a preview of the whole essay