• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the concepts of immortality of the soul with resurrection of the body - to what extent is one of these a more convincing argument for life after death than the other?

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐AO1) Examine the concepts of the immortality of the soul with the resurrection of the body. AO2) To what extent is one of these a more convincing argument for life after death than the other? AO1: Since the beginning of time, philosophers have debated whether a post-mortem existence is possible. The eschatological question not only terrifies us, but astonishes us also. Religion to many provides the comforting idea that this short, seemingly irrelevant existence has meaning when being put towards an afterlife. Different religions teach different forms of life after death within their institutions, but how can we evaluate which one is more plausible? Resurrection is a central doctrine within Christianity, it is also very important amongst other monotheistic religions such as Islam and Judaism. This monistic approach sees that God, as an act of love, will bring back to eternal life those who have died. ?He who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live?.(John 11:25) The person who has died is not ?resuscitated? for this would be a contradiction as life and death are two wholly separate states. The person is no longer the same as the one who has died after resurrection, instead they are given by God a ?spiritual form? also known as the ?soma pneumatikon? which is the continuity of memories and characteristics. ...read more.


Things that change must eventually decay, it is the soul which stays the same. It would therefore be impossible to assume that soul is made from body and body is made from soul. Cogito Ergo Sum or ?I think, therefore I am? is a quote from French philosopher Rene Descartes who is sceptical of the physical world and suggests that to doubt the physical existence of a person is proof of the reality of one?s mind. It would imply that one is not robotic but can think for oneself and proposes that we are free willed. Descartes argues that the soul is the most meaningful way of understanding the afterlife. This notion of life after death would support the perception of the soul being the most meaningful and important reality for it focuses entirely on the soul as opposed to the physical body. Immanuel Kant believed that the purpose of human existence was to achieve complete good or ?summum bonum?. Life is far too short to reach this and so God is morally obligated to grant us eternity. Morality would otherwise be pointless. Immortality of the soul grants the idea of multiple life times in which we can gain this potential. ...read more.


If there are no challenges to overcome, what is the point in existing in an afterlife? How can one be sure that it is truly worthwhile? H.H Price also points out that if we do not have a physical body, how can we interact with other souls? Perhaps we continue to exist but not consciously. There are two men walking down a road, one believes that the road will take them to a city, the other believes there to be nothing. If they do not walk, it cannot be proven right or wrong, they have to reach the end of the road to know the truth and so to argue is meaningless. In conclusion, both the idea of judgement day and death itself cannot be verified until the end of life is reached, and so religion is meaningless. Neither form of life after death provides empirical evidence to support the notion. Immortality of the soul does however seem more plausible than the idea of a body coming back to life as we often hear of people recalling past lives. The only evidence of Resurrection is found in the Bible which is outdated and focuses on the resurrection of Jesus. Immortality of the soul is therefore a more convincing argument for life after death than Resurrection of the body. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    Hick's theory avoids disrupting personal continuity and is, generally speaking, coherent as a whole. However, I would strongly argue against it on the basis that it depends on far too many hypothetical preconditions, such as: that God exists, that there can be another world, and, more importantly, given that such

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Hence, although all knowledge must begin with information acquired through the senses, its results are achieved by rational means. Transcending the sensory preoccupation with particulars, the soul employs the formal methods of logic to cognise the relationships among abstract forms.

  1. Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - Discuss

    Dualists would disagree with the idea of bodily resurrection, both Christianity's and Hick's theories. Plato one of the earliest theorists behind dualism suggested that the mind and soul are separate, he wrote about how the body is finite, and

  2. Plato & The Soul

    Plato believed that the soul, if it were to be the animator of all living things, must be responsible for a person's mental or psychological activities and responses. For the soul cannot be the reason for life, yet at the same time limited in its influence over the bodies in which it animates.

  1. Explain the fundamental ideas of resurrection and immortality of the soul. (18)

    St Paul in 1 Corinthians claims that we have a physical and spiritual body. The physical body cannot inherit the kingdom of God as it is sinful, perishable and not eternal therefore when this body dies god gives us a spiritual one to go to heaven.

  2. Examine the key concepts associated with two of the following: Immortality of the ...

    When one life ends, the next life continues on from the stage reached by the previous life. While rebirth is often identified with reincarnation, reincarnation depends upon belief in an unchanging self, or atman, which Buddhists, disagree with. Within Buddhism there is a variety of different understandings of rebirth, all views emphasise the process of constant change.

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    "I am confident that there truly is such a thing as living again, that the living spring from the dead, and that the souls of the dead are in existence." - Socrates There are ways in which people may argue that there is life after death and evidence for life after death including near death experiences.

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    And furthermore dogs have also been proven to give significance to an object that they favour. Take a dog who chews on a toy every day, if one was to take that toy away from them and give them an alternative, they wouldn?t chew or play with that toy as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work