Exegesis

Mark 9:30-37

Once again Jesus is travelling through Galilee — but unlike his previous travels, this time he takes precautions to avoid being noticed by passing “through Galilee” without also passing through various cities and villages. Why does Jesus feel compelled to predict again that he would die? Who is it that is with Jesus and being taught here? The text refers to his “disciples” and we should try to keep in mind that there is a difference between “disciples” and “apostles.” The former refers to any close followers of Jesus whereas the latter refers only to the twelve he specifically called in chapter 3.

Thus, the reference to “disciples” here indicates that Jesus is informing more than just his twelve apostles that he will die and will rise again after three days.

This passage comes from the Gospel of Mark, which was written around, 65-70 AD. Tradition has ascribed authorship of the Gospel to John Mark who is mentioned in Acts. It is likely that the original readers were gentiles (non-Jews) as Mark explains Jewish customs and words. Mark would have based his Gospel on stories about Jesus that were retold in churches at the time. The passage appears in slightly different forms in both Matthew and Luke.

In the passage, I have chosen Jesus indirectly answers the disciple's question about who is greatest. Given the fact that this was a newly performing community of disciples without established status positions and, given that this was an honour/shame culture, we could assume that the disciples are wondering who among themselves is the greatest. Jesus' answer about greatness makes a contrasting relationship between the importance of social rank and the humility of servitude. Jesus elevates the status of the last, the servant and the child. Then he goes to a further extreme by equating the welcoming of one such as these, as equal to the welcoming of God. Jesus appears to present not only a new concept of status but he suggests that through the radical practice of receiving the last, the servant and the child, one can receive God.

Join now!

In the first-century Mediterranean culture, children were treated as property; they were possessions belonging to their fathers. "Parents are right to ignore the child's point of view and to disregard the child's feelings and capacities" (Malina, 55). "Children owe their lives to the parents, a debt that they can never adequately repay". Children had no power, no privilege, and no prosperity. Children lived only through the good will and care provided to them by others. The New Interpreter's Bible said that the child in this society was a "non-person" and was "socially invisible" and, it would be unusual for a child ...

This is a preview of the whole essay