• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the approach of Situation Ethics to moral decision making.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain the approach of Situation Ethics to moral decision making. [35] Situation Ethics is a teleological approach to decision making, meaning that it is concerned with the ethical implications of the end result of an action as opposed to the fundamental correctness of the action itself. In 1962 an American Protestant Christian Theologian called Professor Joseph Fletcher wrote a book called ?Situation Ethics?. Traditionally Christianity had been dominated by Natural Law thinking and in particular the view that certain actions were absolutely and always right or wrong, and Situation Ethics arose out of that background. Situationists claim that Jesus came to do away with a legalistic approach to religion. Situation Ethics is the name Fletcher gave to his system of moral thinking. Fletcher argued that it was pointless to try to look for moral laws which would cover every situation you could think of in life - life was far too complicated for that. The only absolute rule is that of love. It is not literally a ?rule? but an attitude or motive to help inform our moral choices. In any situation, a person must ask themselves what does love require them to do. ...read more.

Middle

Relativism does not imply that anything goes. To be relative one has to be relative to something and in the case of Situation Ethics it should be to love. We must always act lovingly - how this is to be applied will depend on the situation. This theory also takes a positivistic position believing that values are derived voluntarily, not rationally. A man decides on his values, he does not deduce them from nature. Situationists believe in the supremacy of love because faith claims that God is love. It is only in the norm of Christian love that other moral expressions find their justification. Finally, personalism implies that there are no inherently good things, only persons are inherently valuable. Value only ?happens? to things. This theory sees ethics as dealing with human relations. Situation Ethics puts people at the centre. The Legalists would ask what the law says whereas Situation Ethics asks how people can be helped. The Christian is committed to love people, not laws. This aspect of Situation Ethics appeals to liberal protestants. Situation Ethics opposed deductive methods of moral arguments ? also so called casuistry. ...read more.

Conclusion

Seen in this light, Situation Ethics will start from the belief that it is generally in our interests to create families, nurturing and educating our children. However, in exceptional circumstances the situation might demand a different, loving response. Abortion would be an exception in extreme circumstances, not a method of birth control (as it has become in some countries). The main challenge to situation ethics within Christendom comes from the Roman Catholic Church, who prefer Natural Law. For example, in the case of Jodie and Mary, conjoined twins, the Catholic Church wanted to let both of the girls die. To kill one, saving the other, would be an evil or bad act, they said. Fletcher would have disagreed. Letting both girls die is not pragmatic. It would be of more use, more practical, to save one girl at the expense of the other. Overall, what the situationist does have in advance is a general knowledge of what he should do (love), why he should do it (for God's sake), to whom it should be done (his neighbours). He knows that this love is altruistic, not egoistic and should be exercised towards as many neighbours as possible. To quote the Apostle Paul, ?Love does no wrong to a neighbour, therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    all aim for and that good and bad is not merely relative. Taking this into consideration, Natural Law is a potentially insensitive and authoritarian moral system where general principles are applied to specific situations regardless of particular circumstances. For example, if reproduction is one of the final causes, how can we explain those who are homosexual or infertile?

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    Hospices are there to attempt to relieve pain and provide support for a patient, their family and friends. There are only about 100 hospices in the UK so it is very difficult to get a place. The three main aims of hospices are, to relieve pain, to help face death and to care for emotional needs of family and friends.

  1. "Religious ethics are not the best approach to environmental issues". Discuss.

    This renders it a somewhat useless approach, as many would argue that the fundamental concern of environmentalism is the preservation of the earth for future generations. Unlike Kantian Ethics, Utilitarianism can be based on either a Shallow Ecology or Deep Ecology approach.

  2. The founder of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher felt that the individual should be of ...

    This shows that it identifies the need for individuals in certain situations. It is especially favourable because it puts people first and is possible to apply in every situation, it is selfless and refreshing and is constantly promoting Agape love.

  1. Kantian ethics provides a helpful method to making moral decisions

    theory was applied worldwide that would be nearly 7.5 billion at the time of writing) it would have to be extremely broad, leaving it open to being interpreted in drastically different ways. If the rule said that one simply had to please the majority, what happens to those who disagree?

  2. Situation Ethics and Moral Decision Making.

    As mentioned earlier, Fletcher was influenced by the New Testament, and used the example of Jesus as a prominent guideline throughout his theory. Jesus had argued with the Pharisees over their legalistic approach in the Gospel, and it is Jesus that Fletcher took influence from.

  1. Utilitarianism ethics is the not the best approach to environmental ethics discuss

    forces people to the right course of action in order to preserve the environment. For example when looking at the issue of deforestation it is hard to apply an ethic that is based on pleasure,

  2. Medical Ethics And Organ Transplants

    This would mean that someone who does higher pleasures more frequently would be more worthy of an organ. Many also argue that by looking at Quality of Life when choosing who should receive an organ would result in a discrimination of the old.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work