• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It is Obvious that Morality is Relative Critically Assess This Claim.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Year 12/13 Academic Essay ?Ethics? 2012 1. ?It is Obvious that Morality is Relative? Critically Assess This Claim. Joel Croos Dr Reid Religious Education Twenty Third April 2012 894 words In putting my name on the cover sheet I declare that the contents therein are my work, reflecting my learning. No part of this assignment has been copied from another student?s work. I further declare that I have acknowledged all sources where I have used or referred to someone else?s work and/ or ideas The exact nature of morality is a conundrum which has separated ethicists for eras. Albeit at times during the world there has been a clear distinction between what is perceived as good and what is perceived as bad. For example; In Ancient Greece it was considered customary for grown men (not necessarily fathers) ...read more.


(absolutist): doing what is right means doing your duty or following the rules?[2] .To be able to contrast and criticise between Absolutist ethical theories and Relative ethical theories, we must first comprehend what are some constituents of each theory and the definitions. Kant and the Natural Law are major components of Absolutist ethical theories, Kant states that we should act according to maxims that we would want to see as universal laws. These laws are absolutist and that we will be able to work them out through ?a priori knowledge? which is knowledge of proposition and doesn?t require experience to be known true, this mean we can work them out logically prior to experience. Natural Law is debatably deontological, as it leads with a set of rules that people must follow and these rules know of no exception hence they are absolutist. ...read more.


if I had an obligation to be honest all the time, it would usually lead to great happiness, however in some cases it will lead to more unhappiness, this is absolutist because there are no exceptions to the rules.[5] Another dual theory is Virtue Theory Aristotle derived a list of virtues that we need to acquire, through education and routinely (as in everyday life), in order to have a happy life. This view can be seen as absolutist and teleological, because it is about the ends or purposes of our actions. Albeit Aristotle claims that particular ends or goals are absolute, it?s always good to have good virtues such as kindness, honesty etc. To recapitulate, it is not vastly evident that morality is obviously relative, and not obvious that is better than absolutism; however both theories can only be truly a***s on a case by case basis, not including extraneous circumstances and scenarios which are on both sides. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain and assess the view that morality is based on self-interest

    The definition differs so vastly, that perhaps the word 'flourishing' may be a better translation of 'eudemonia'. Another term 'ergon' is also a common used concept amongst the philosophy which we are about to discuss. It means 'function' - it is linked to eudemonia in that for something to be 'good' it must fulfil its function.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    The difference lies in the differentiation between the value of the action and the level of blame/credit given to the person committing that action. Mill's Utilitarianism would advocate almost exactly the same course of action as Conventional Morality in most situations.

  1. Discuss critically the differing notions of power and freedom explored in the 'Gorgias'.

    In the same way, if I put someone to death or confiscate his property, but doing these things won't actually be for good, then I'm not doing what I want, even though I'm doing as I see fit."

  2. Fathers and Sons - The Quarrel – Chapter 10 .

    Bazarov handles this argument simply by referring to the most Russian people he knows, the peasants, who have knowledge of the past peasants who have risen and become of higher status now. Bazarov, as we have seen earlier in the book, talks to the peasants and doesn't mind answering their questions and talking to them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work