• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Medical Ethics And Organ Transplants

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Medical Ethics Essay The field of medical ethics is one is of severe complexity, diversity and covering a wide range of topics in the medical world. Within medical ethics it is especially important to consider religious principles and the effect they have on the options for religious believers and effects on faith. One of the key issues for debate, considered to be the most controversial and varying is organ transplantation and organ donation. Religious principles and ethical values directly affect the outcome of an organ transplantation or donation, and for many faiths they should be upheld in all circumstances, even in a matter of life or death. Many medical developments in organ donation are often very controversial and use cutting edge research and development which many religious believers deem unacceptable and religious principles should be upheld. In the words of Albert Einstein ?science without religion is dumb, religion without science is deaf?. Science and religion therefore must co-operate and coincide in the complex field of organ donation. The first successful transplantation was in 1945 however the idea of transporting tissue or organs from a deceased or living donor has been around since the 3rd century. There are many religious faiths that would reject organ transplantation. There are a huge number of people waiting for a donation organ, as of April 2012 there are currently 7288 people waiting for an organ in the UK, however in the year 2011-2012, 3960 organ transplantation did take place. There has also been a 50% increase in organ donations given since 2008 (as of April 2013) , however it is estimated that 1000 people die every year in the UK waiting for an organ, even though one single person has the ability to change 6-10 peoples? lives. An import issue and development of the organ transplantation/medical ethics is the use of an ?opt in? system which is applied in the UK. ...read more.


Singer objects to the Christian view as a crime of Specimim as it would discriminate against animals, and ultimately we should not be ?set apart?. On a scientific level it has been proven that humans and chimpanzees share 98% of their DNA with one another. How can we be set apart from something so like ourselves? However to agree with Locke?s principle would denounce babies and people with Alzheimer?s. It would therefore important to define what a person as opposed to a non-person. E.E.Cummings backs this view by stating that ?un-being dead is not being alive? and that some people are not worthy of people called a person, such as those in prisons. Under personhood the idea of xenotransplantation ? the transplantation of animal organs to humans would be rejected as animals are just as much ?persons? as human beings. Moreover this would pose another religious opponent of Hinduism, which sees the cow as sacred. Moreover this is applied to organ donation in the sense that do we prioritise those who are classes as a person over that of a ?non person and if someone is indeed classed as a non-person can we freely take their organs without their consent? Singer believes that ?killing a person is far worse than killing a non-person?, which means that he, discriminates on the grounds of brain function and mental ability. If this was applied to organ donation then babies organs could freely be removed in order to save some that is a classed as person. This would intern over time limit the earth?s reproduction. Another thing to consider it with personhood is when does a person stop beaming a person, is it when they loose consciousness or when they are completely brain dead and cease to function. Singer said that a person stops being a person when consciousness is lost but how would we be able to predict if that person would later regain consciousness, we cannot ever predict the outcome of a situation. ...read more.


It supports the idea that humans should not be treated as ?a means to and end? and that all human life is scared and special which should be treated with respect, this coincides with some aspects of sanctity of life. Kant developed the theory of universalisability, the idea that if an idea can be universalised then it is deemed good. Kantian ethics is more based on the individuals personal opinion, rather than as a suggestion on the opt in opt out system. In conclusion the objection for the opt out system is essentially, if this system was implemented many organs may be removed without consent or respect. In India especially there is a high rate of organs which do not need to be used, being sold on the black market (although there were laws passed in the 1980s in an attempt to stop this). This then violates their civil liberties and the principles for respect for autonomy. It can be argued that although removing organs from someone who does not want them removed is unfortunate they do indeed have the option to opt out and it?s for the greater good. Many of the ethical theories attempt to divulge the developments of organ donation system in the UK, especially personhood and sanctity of life which I find to be extremely powerful in the argument of opt in opt out. However many fail to take in the patients autonomy. Organs as part of the body which we should have the choice over.to implement an opt out system restricts their autonomy greatly which should be a civil liberty. Therefore in my opinion the autonomy of a person is the most important thing when considering the new developments for organ donation. A person should have freedom of choice to opt in; it should not be a requirement. The principle of autonomy accepts that everyone person has the right to choose which is what I believe. In the end ?it?s all a matter of personal choice? (Paul Davis) whether you want to donate your organs and the government have no right to make it compulsory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. In this essay I will be looking at Ethics and the importance of using ...

    Are we able stay within the client's frame of reference (Empathy) and does our own attraction have some bearing on this? The B.A.C.P framework states that "Practitioners must not abuse their clients trust in order to gain sexual, emotional, financial or any other kind of personal advantage.

  2. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    If someone were to do their moral duty, then it seems that it would not matter if it had negative consequences. One of the main advocates of this philosophy is Immanual Kant (1724-1804), who, during the Enlightenment Project, attempted to deduce the rational way to live.

  1. "Religious ethics are not the best approach to environmental issues". Discuss.

    that by destroying the environment we are threatening the existence of the entire human race. Most utilitarians would agree that this possible consequence out-weighs all other considerations and should therefore conclude that we have a responsibility to care for the environment.

  2. Examine how Benthams utilitarianism may be applied to one ethical issue of your choice. ...

    * Purity - Will the pleasure bring about more pleasure? If an act, that causes pleasure to one, but later becoming a pain is impure. Therefore a pleasure that would bring about more pleasure (such as medicine rather than recreational drugs)

  1. What is Christian ethics?

    They also believe it is essential to follow Jesus' teachings if they are to be saved. The Divine Command theory is a strong part of Christian ethics as it poses a vital belief - the argument is that something is good simply because God commands it and for no other reason.

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    The contrast of this is consequentialism and is based on the idea that the ends justify the means (An actions morality is determined by its consequences) because it is consequential it deals with relative, particular and intrinsic values. Utilitarianism, a consequentialist theory, has no support for moral absolutes because it

  1. Examine and comment on the view that religious and/or moral principles provide essential guidelines ...

    Since there is evidence from both sides that biological life begins at conception, surely the law would deem abortion as murder? But, David Steel MP introduced the bill into parliament that became known as the 1967 Abortion Act. This law was created to prevent dangerous back alley abortions taking place.

  2. Religious and/or moral principles are a hindrance with medical ethics. Examine and comment on ...

    When we apply these attributes to a foetus we can see how one would seem to display none of these traits, therefore a foetus, through this idea, is not a person. Religious principles are definitely a hindrance when observing this medical ethic through the religious idea of ensoulment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work