Plato and Aristotle offer highly contrasting definitions of the soul
) Plato and Aristotle offer highly contrasting definitions of the soul with Plato’s being very similar to the current, excepted idea of a soul is whilst Aristotle’s concept is something that isn’t thought of when considering the soul by the majority. Plato’s soul links in with the Judaeo-Christian belief on the soul as he suggests that it is eternal and a separate entity entirely from the body that lives on after the bodies’ death. It is used by Christians to tell of how we are judged after death whilst its main importance to Plato’s theories is that it describes a way in which the world of appearances and the world of forms are linked together and how these perfect concepts are viewed by us. Like those that follow the excepted views on the body on souls given by the previously mentioned religions, Plato was a dualist meaning that he believes that the soul is independent of the body and also that it hold the true essence of the person within. This means that the essence of people have been among the forms which could suggest why humans can recognise goodness and beauty when the world doesn’t hold them in their perfect form for us to view.