• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

Extracts from this document...


St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument Background of Thomas Aquinas * St Thomas Aquinas (1224-74) was born at Roccasea, near Aquino in Italy. He was of aristocratic background and studied at the Benedictine monastery of Monte Cassino before entering the University of Naples. * Aquinas was a Dominican and hence a friar, he committed himself to the Order, to live and work wherever they instructed him. He went to Cologne where he was a pupil of St Albert who wanted to provide an account of the newly discovered and translated work of Aristotle. * Albert moved to the University of Paris, and Aquinas followed. He began studying for a degree of Mater of Arts, which he completed when he was 30, writing a commentary on The Sentences of Peter Lombard. He wrote many commentaries on Aristotle and other authors. * He is best known for his two great Summas, Summa Contra Gentiles and Summa Theologicae. The Five ways and the Cosmological Argument * In "Summa Theologica" Aquinas gives his five ways for the existence of G-d, the first three are better known as the cosmological argument. * He rejects the Ontological argument, as he says an argument that says G-d's existence is self-evident we cannot use as we can't see the self evidence. ...read more.


The linking of cause to effect depends upon them being observed as two separate things. However, we cannot get "outside". The worlds to observe its cause.We have not experienced the creation of a Universe. Yet we are prepared to argue that because there are causes of things within the Universe, there is a cause for the Universe as a whole. * Religion suggests that the world operates on cause and effect and that there must therefore be a First Cause, namely God. In Hume's worldview, causation is assumed but ultimately unknowable. We do not know there is a First Cause or a place for God. These difficulties were noted by Dorothy Emmet in a book written at the end of her life: "First Cause' is not the first member of a casual sequence [...] It is an eternal non-temporal activity on which everything else depends." The problems mentioned put together an argument: 1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause so that it can exist 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the Universe must have a cause for its existence It appears weak. Premise 1 is not self-evidently true. We cannot know that everything has a cause - we cannot deduce the necessary of all from many instances. ...read more.


Russell also suggested that the argument appeared to suggest that because everyone has a mother, then the Universe must have a parent. While this might be true for each Human Being, it does not follow for the Universe. * Copleston argues that everything within the Universe has a cause. * Russell argues that it does not. However, if Russell could be persuaded to accept that everything has a cause, he would probably want to argue that the existence of "God" needs an explanation just as much as the Universe needs an explanation. Criticisms * A problem which needs addressing is the sense in which G-d can ever be the stopping point in explanation. To say "G-d did it" seems not to end the question but create more - why did he make this or that etc... To answer those questions, we would need to know the mind of G-d which religious people say is a mystery we will never know. * A point worthy of comment is that there is, as Russell and Copleston suggested, a kind of stalemate., as if atheist and theist can both agree that either the universe is ultimately explicable, or a mere brute fact. One proposition is true, or the other is; there seems no obvious way behind that dilemma. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    A supporter of Aquinas may know he held odd views about astrology. He may therefore concede that many particular events are demonstrably mistaken. But he can also add that this point is utterly irrelevant to the arguments of the second way.

  2. Explain Aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God. Humes criticisms ...

    seeing causes and effects this is because there is sufficient evidence to believe this. Since all things in the universe are, in my opinion, dependent on something else for their own existence, for example, people would not have existed without their parents, the universe as a whole can be seen

  1. Augustine on creation and Aquinas on the existence of God.

    Thus, he states that if the motion of any corporeal object is one thing, but the standard in which we measure it is another, time can not based off of any movement of a corporeal object. He then replaces this method of measurement with the example of sound, explaining that

  2. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    The result, as Hythloday mythically describes it, is a perfect world in which people leave in accord because they are cut off from the source of greed and envy. In this world, people develop a complete detachment to the unnecessary material life because they do not own anything except for their own bodies.

  1. Explain the Copplestone-Russell Radio Debate

    "I should maintain that there is a contingent being, it follows of necessity that there is a necessary being." (Copplestone) In his argument Coplestone concludes that the actual existence of contingent beings means that there is a necessary being. On the other hand it was this argument from necessity which caused conflict between Copplestone and Russell.

  2. Discuss the concept of Natural Law with reference to the ideas of Aristotle and ...

    However they were normally treated as absolutes. So, even though natural law has the potential for flexibility it is often interpreted rigidly. Natural moral law is concerned with both exterior and interior acts, also known as action and intention. Simply doing the right thing is not enough; to be truly moral ones intention must be right as well.

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    Furthermore cause usually has some purpose behind it; however we cannot seem to find a universal purpose that everyone accepts, as the purposes that religion gives are clearly not universal as only adherents of that religion have them. If the universe did have a purpose, would we not be able

  2. Explain the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, according to Aquinas

    is the cause of the effect not only in respect of becoming but also in respect of being.? Aquinas argues that the causes cannot be the same nature as its effects this is coherent in the 2nd and 3rd way too.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work