The purpose of this essay is too define and explain Orientalism, and how the term Orientalist applies to Christian missionaries in the Far East.

Authors Avatar

Knupp

        Europeans used the term Orient to describe the peoples and places of Asia and the Middle East.  While widely accepted prior to the late twentieth century, this term has aroused criticism among historians.  The purpose of this essay is too define and explain Orientalism, and how the term Orientalist applies to Christian missionaries in the Far East.  Two main examples of these missionaries are Matteo Ricci and Francis Xavier who served in China and Japan respectively.  Both of these missionaries fall under the definition of Orientalists as defined by Edward Said.

        Edward Said defines Orientalism in multiple parts; the first of which is the academic.  Academic Orientalism is the study of the Orient for the purpose of understanding and learning.  Modern historians view the term Orient to be too vague for an area as large as Asia, but it is still widely used throughout the world.  Academic Orientalism attempts to study and understand the Orient from afar.  Professors of Chinese language who have never spoken with a Chinese person are a common example of this detached intellectualism.  Often in 18th Century Europe the Orientalist would study and judge the Orient based on second hand knowledge and conjecture.  This view of understanding the Orient better than the Oriental without living it leads into the second part of Orientalism.

        The second part of Orientalism as defined by Said is the justification of subjugation.  Europeans believed that due to their better understanding of the history of a culture, and their superior culture they needed to dominate other cultures in order to improve them.  Arthur James Balfour, a member of the British parliament once said in reference to Egypt; “We are in Egypt not merely for the sake of the Egyptians, though we are there for their sake; we are there also for the sake of Europe at large.”  Balfour meant by this that British occupation of Egypt was necessary for the protection of the Egyptians and for the benefit of all Europe.  Balfour and other Orientalist believed that they understood Egypt better than the Egyptians themselves, and for this reason governed Egypt for the benefit of Egypt.  This form of justification was used throughout the Orient.  China, India, Philippines and others were all subjugated on the justification of the white mans burden.  The idea of the burden of the white race to civilize inferior races was a key part of Orientalism.

Join now!

        One of the main points of Orientalism is the division of humanity into us and them.  The Occidental and the Oriental, East and West, these are divisions created by Europeans in order to dominate the other.  By separating the peoples an Orientalist can justify the subjugation and forced change of other races.  Said’s overall point is that Orientalism was created by Europeans in order to justify the subjugation of the Orientals.  Cultural and intellectual superiority and the separation of us and them led to three hundred years of European imperialism in the so called Orient.

        In order to understand how ...

This is a preview of the whole essay