• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To get to heaven you must behave morally. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


To get to heaven you must behave morally. Discuss. Heaven is the Christian concept of eternal good life after death. How one gets there is disputed amongst Christians, but if it's possible to even get there is a matter debated by philosophers and scientists. If the existence of a life after death can be disproved, then it follows that there is no necessity for behaving morally to achieve life after death. Even if heaven does exist, it does not necessarily mean that one has to behave morally to get there. This statement assumes the existence of heaven and the ability to behave morally. The existence of heaven is only held by Christians, therefore anyone who does not believe in God would not see behaving morally as a means for getting into heaven, as it does not exist. Furthermore, the ability to behave morally is not necessarily true. From the viewpoint of determinism we are unable to behave morally as we are already pre-determined in our behaviour. ...read more.


if we are free to go against God's teachings and still end up in heaven? Other Christians such as Augustine argued against this point, saying that only those who do behave morally will get to heaven. This view has it's own problems. What of those who cannot behave morally, for they cannot distinguish between right and wrong? And is it right to punish a man for eternity because of one act he did in his time on earth? This former criticism is further justified through the existence of determinism. If he was pre-determined to act amorally, then he should not be held eternally responsible. Furthermore, this only works for Christians. He does not take into account any other religions, non-believers and agnostics. Therefore, only Christians would agree with the above statement, and only those who believe in judgement day would agree with Augustine's ideas. As the statement relies on the assumption of a life after death, those who dispute its existence are obviously going to criticise the need for behaving morally. ...read more.


While there is no proof for heaven, there is no proof that one doesn't exist either. If we take this approach that morals have come from society and individuals, then the concept of a conscience is destroyed. For without universal concepts of morality, then what we perceive as such through our conscience is far from given by God. Kant's moral theory points towards a God. He argues that morals are absolute and exist outside of us. On one level Kant would therefore agree with the statement. However, he also outlined why we should act moray. He argued that we should only act for duties sake (categorical imperatives) and not on the basis to achieve something (categorical imperatives). Therefore if we act morally not for duties sake, but to get to heaven surely we are using a categorical imperative? In conclusion, it is not clear if it is necessary to behave morally as it is not clear whether it is required to reach heaven, or in fact if heaven exists. It is clear that behaving morally should be an agenda of all, regardless of their beliefs of life after death however. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. A study of the New Testaments’ teachings, on adultery and homosexuality- How might ...

    to mean that Jesus agreed with it. In a very subtle way they almost go as far as to say Jesus embraces it.

  2. Outline the arguments for the dependency of morality and religion

    is too religion that the world turns when it is struck by some new disaters. People are often called to religion after they have done something terrible and are in remorse for it, something that one nevers hears about with atheism.

  1. AS level coursework

    William Barclay argued that miracles can happen apart from "we think too much of what we can do and too little about what Jesus Christ can do through us." Miracles altogether play a huge role on the church today as they are an important part of individual's religion as it

  2. Abortion, a christians view.

    Yet, if an abortion is considered necessary then the church believes this should be done at the earliest possible stage. The most common reasons why abortion is carried out are to preserve the life or health of the mother, to prevent a pregnancy brought on by r**e, to prevent a

  1. Descartes logically proved the existence of an infinite and truthful being - Discuss.

    Therefore the idea of "sin" is sound. Then comes the separation of a venial sin and mortal sin. One might think that the separation is God passing judgement on you. Passing judgement on someone to live forever in h**l would harm them. It would make the Judgement maker unjust and less noble.

  2. Jesus was more interested in teaching people how to behave rather than what to ...

    Overall these teachings seem to be more directed towards subduing the behaviour of his followers so that they could not be threatened under oppressive Roman rule. On the other hand, it may be argues that Jesus? sole purpose was teaching belief.

  1. Gods omniscience and omnibenevolence are compatible. Discuss.

    and omniscient as he has not given us perfect judgement, we are only looking at one part of the overall ?Absolute Reality?. The complete universe is perfect, and as every piece of reality is connected to build this, we must accept God?s decision to not give us perfect judgement by

  2. Contemporary discussion on Augustine

    Kant believes that if one can break away from powerful human emotions and desires, act altruistically and rise about animal level of existence, an authentic, happy and free life can be lived, since Kant does not believe in the idea of Original Sin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work