• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With reference to the topics you have investigated, examine and comment on the claim that the teachings of the new testament do not add anything of value to our value of our understanding of Life after Death. (50 marks)

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Sam Benham With reference to the topics you have investigated, examine and comment on the claim that the teachings of the new testament do not add anything of value to our value of our understanding of Life after Death. (50 marks) The claim that the teachings of the New Testament do not add anything of value to our value of our understanding of life after death is a very big claim to make. With reference to the topics I have investigated, 1Cor 15, St. Paul, Soma, The Soul, Dualism, Monism and the Empty Tomb, I will examine and comment on that claim. This claim is controversial because it has many objections from other scholars and many Christians. In 1 Corinthians 15 there are six key sections. The first of which is Christ?s Resurrection. Here Paul is keen to tell the Corinthians that he isn?t the teacher on life after death and that he is simply passing on Jesus? message, because as we know, Jesus was the teacher and his apostles, which later included Paul after Damascus, were his messengers. The second section is the denial of the resurrection. Paul says that some people argue that ?there will be no resurrection of the dead? and some scholars argue that this is not a theological argument, but Paul argues that the soul is immortal and not the body. Paul illustrates the theological implications of the objections from Corinth are that if dead men don?t rise, then Christ did not rise and Christian faith is empty. Paul continues to say that if Christ was not raised, then our preaching is useless. Clearly Jesus? resurrection must have happened as the tradition has survived. The third section is all about the consequences of Christ?s resurrection. Barrett writes that ?the resurrection of Christ is a pledge and proof of the resurrection of his people?. St Paul makes a direct link between Adam and Christ, Adam?s actions had far reaching consequences such as original sin and Christ?s Resurrection has too such consequence such as universal salvation. ...read more.


Additionally, Paul uses the analogy of the seed, stressing the continuity of the earthly body with the resurrected ?glorious? body. In 1Cor 15:50-54 Sanders comments that immortality is ?put on? and replaces mortality. Paul was not thinking of an interior soul which escapes its mortal shell and floats free, nor the new life being breathed into the same body, but again of transformation, achieved by covering mortality with immortality, which it ? swallows?; emphasising the physical. Wright and Barrett argue similar points. My own personal opinion is that Paul believed more in a spiritual resurrection but he didn?t rule out a physical resurrection. In light of the statement I think that this is an influential part of our understanding of Life after death because it helps us understand which resurrection was more likely. The term ?soul? refers to ourselves, who earn rewards and consequences by coming to know, or failing to come to know, God by faith. We will come to earn blissful life in heaven, or eternal loss of heaven. Jesus? parables clearly teach us that it is the same self judgement which faces judgement after death as the self who lived on earth in the body. There are three different theories about the soul. The first theory being the Theory of Origen. The soul existed in the heavenly realms before descending into this world, and that its present imprisonment in a material body is the result of a primeval fall from grace. This was never widely accepted, and rejected by the Church at the Council of Constantinople in 540 AD. The second argument is that of Traducianism. The theory that the soul-substance which God breathed into Adam has been passed down through generation after generation of his descendants by continual division. To some extent, this draws parallel with modern genetic science: everything comes from a gene pool. This was gradually abandoned by the Church. ...read more.


Brown argues that there was an understandable hostility in the early church toward the Jewish leaders. In Christian eyes, they had engineered a judicial murder of Jesus. Therefore, because Joseph of Arimathea was a part of the Sanhedrin that condemned Jesus, it is highly unlikely that he was a Christian invention (there is no reason why Christians would make up a story about a Jewish Sanhedrinist who does what is right by Jesus!). The empty tomb is reported by many independent early sources (incl. Mt, Mk, Lk, Jn, and Paul). Jewish historian Josephus reports that Jewish women were not even allowed to serve as witnesses in court; making it even more remarkable that it was women who discovered the empty tomb (surely this detail would have been omitted or changed if it were not true?!). My own personal opinion is that there was a resurrection, but going on the arguments given to us, I think that it was a bodily resurrection and that I would fall under the bracket of a monist. I believe that the New Testament teachings help us in our understanding of Life after Death because it teaches us about the body and soul, but I believe that it was a bodily resurrection because i believe the that the body and soul must have been working together as one to raise Jesus from the dead, because if it was one or the other then Jesus would have come back as a different person. Others would disagree with me because they feel that the bible is made up and that the historicity aspect is just coincidence and that it was a recent write-up of events of landmarks still existing today. This view fails because Johanine eschatology proves otherwise. The pool with five porticos still exists today, and that wouldn?t have been included in John?s gospel if it didn?t exist in John?s time. The eschatological aspect of it is that Jesus? second coming will be at the Parousia when, we rise, bodily and spiritually to overcome death and evil. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. A study of the New Testaments’ teachings, on adultery and homosexuality- How might ...

    s*x" so the scripture would read: "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Send them out so we may have s*x them." So it is obvious that at least in most modern Bibles this particular scripture has come to be associated with the punishment of homosexuality.

  2. Essay on Pauls first missionary journey

    in the word of God could grow to have more faith in God; however others believe that the aim of Paul's missionary journey was to convert both Jews and Gentiles to Christianity. Therefore some are chosen to believe that the first missionary was meant for Jewish converts and Jewish converts

  1. Outline and Examine Jesus attitudes towards outcasts in Lukes Gospel.To what extent do these ...

    or God the most, which in a lot a cases was the sinners. Another Example of Jesus accepting the outcasts would be Zacchaeus (19:1-10), where Zacchaeus was also a Tax collector, and when Jesus was passing through Jericho, Zacchaeus climbed a sycamore tree in order to see Jesus, which showed

  2. With reference to relevant examples, explain what Christians understand by the principle of the ...

    There is some debate surrounding what his religious beliefs actually were, but Kant knows that we cannot prove moral principles based on experience. Morality is synthetic a priori - statements about the world that cannot be confirmed by looking at the world.

  1. Mind and body- Dualism, a Christian view.

    found Moses and Elijah talking with Jesus. Elijah and Moses were deceased centauries before the incarnation of Jesus and where abiding in the rest of God. Therefore, this proves the soul lives on even when the body perishes. 1. From my response to the first question it will be apparent

  2. To what extent did Jesus intend to replace the Torah?

    Only God can forgive sins and that in the third book of the Torah, Leviticus 24:16 states that he that blasphemes the name of the Lord "shall surely be put to death". By healing the paralytic, Jesus seemed to be guilty of blasphemy and therefore replacing the Torah by his actions.

  1. Outline theories on the immortality of the soul and ressurection of the body

    Gilbert Rile compares this to a ?ghost in the machine?, implying that our body is just a machine and our body makes us aware. Saint Thomas Aquinas shares a similar view referring to the soul as ?anima.? This means animation, believing that the soul animates the body and gives us our characteristics and personalities.

  2. Evaluate the claim that Mark's Gospel is all about the failure of the disciples.

    For Mark readers, as well as for those who heard Jesus in the synagogue, Jesus is one with an authority far greater that of the scribes let alone the disciples. Jesus hits back at their failure claiming "you faithless generation."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work