• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5

# Aim: to find the refractive index of water

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The refractive index of water

Aim: to find the refractive index of water

Data collection

 real depth RD/cm apparent depth AD/cm RD+-0.05cm AD+-0.05cm 8.85 6.15 6.30 7.10 6.75 9.30 6.70 7.70 7.65 7.15 9.60 7.95 7.20 6.90 7.05 14.95 11.65 11.90 10.75 12.35

Data processing

For the first trial,

=(6.15+6.30+7.10+6.75)/4=6.57

Middle

Real depth RD/cm

RD+-0.05cm

8.85

6.57+-0.47

9.30

7.30+-0.50

9.60

7.27+-0.52

14.95

11.66+-0.57

worst fit line with maximum gradient: (14.95-8.85)/( 11.66-0.57-6.57-0.47)=1.51

worst fit line with minimum gradient: (14.95-8.85)/( 11.66+0.57-6.57+0.47)= 1.00

Average uncertainty=(GMAX-GMIN)/2=(1.51-1.00)/2=0.26

So the refractive index is 1.20+-0.26

Percentage uncertainty=0.26/1.20=21.7%

Percentage discrepancy=(1.33-1.20)/1.33=9.8%

Conclusion

So there is a proportional relationship between apparent depth and the real depth. The gradient shows the experimental value of the refractive index of water is 1.20+-0.26.

The systematic error could be the thickness of the mirror. Then, the position of the virtual image in the water will appear to be higher then the actual one. This will affect the apparent depth and thus the refractive. The other systematic error is the bulge of the middle part of water compared to area all around.

Conclusion

2 I should change the cork into a magnet next time so that it can attract the pin without changing the length of it. Then two pins will just be in the same size removing a systematic error.

3 from the graph it’s shown that my three previous values are quite close to each other and the forth one appears to be far away. Next time, I should find more cups with bigger difference in sizes compared to each other. Then, the data range will also increase, improving the accuracy. More trials can also reduce some random errors.

4 in choosing the mirror, I should choose the one as thin as possible. So thin that the thickness of it can be ignorable and this can help me get a bigger control both independent and dependent variable.

Reference

1 http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2005/AmyHo.shtml

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

1. ## In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope ...

It will also be important to make sure that the ruler is straight as well as any other equipment when measuring, and not at an angle. This could cause an error in the distance being measured. To overcome this I may use a setsquare to line up the equipment.

2. ## My experiments focus is to obtain an accurate measurement for a specific lenss power.

The power value is 0.23 Dioptres more than the first experiment and 0.37 Dioptres more than the second. The uncertainty is lower than both the first experiments (+/- 0.075) and the second's (+/- 0.1). This suggests the third experiment's result is more reliable.

1. ## Lenses experiment

after the first result but it took about three results until they evened out. I got these results for several reasons. I know that a convex lens causes the magnification to decrease as the object is moved further away from the lens.

2. ## The eye.

Judgement of distance Stereoscopic vision helps animals judge distances. Most animals with eyes at sides of their head can judge distance only by the apparent size of objects and by parallel i.e. apparent movement of near objects against a background of distant objects when the head is turned from side to side.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to