An Experiment to Show the Rate of Respiration In a Locust
Aim
The rate of respiration in an organism can be determined either by measuring the volume of oxygen taken in, or the volume of carbon dioxide produced. The aim of this experiment was to determine the rate of respiration of a locust using an instrument called a respirometer.
Method
- The respirometer consisted of 2 equal chambers- an experimental one containing the respiring organism, and a control one, containing an equal volume of non-respiring material (in this case a marble).
- The 2 chambers were connected by a U-shaped manometer tube that had a diameter of 1mm, containing a coloured fluid (manometer fluid)- this differential respirometer ensured that any fluctuations in temperature or pressure affected both sides of the manometer equally and so they cancel each other out.
- An equal volume of some soda lime (a carbon dioxide absorbing material) was added to each chamber.
- I then left the apparatus in a water bath filled with water of approximately 32 degrees for about 5 minutes to allow it to reach the desired temperature.
- I left screw clips A and B open at these times to allow air to escape as it expands.
- I closed both screw clips after 5 minutes, allowing the experiment to start.
- The carbon dioxide given off by the respiration of the locust was absorbed by the soda lime, hence a reduction in the volume of air in chamber B.
- As chamber B was airtight, this lead to a reduction in pressure within, thus the pressure of chamber A (control) was greater than the pressure of chamber B (experimental) and so the air moved towards chamber B, pushing the manometer fluid towards chamber B as it does so.
- I then measured and recorded the distance moved by the miniscus of the manometer fluid every minute for 12 minutes and plotted the results on a graph.
This is a preview of the whole essay
Teacher Reviews
Here's what a teacher thought of this essay
This is a relatively straight forward experiment and the method is clearly described and the data well displayed. However, a fundamental misunderstanding of what information the apparatus provides limits the quality of this work. 3 Stars