• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reintroduction of Wolves to Yellowstone National Park: Good or Bad?

Extracts from this document...


Samad Ahmed Reintroduction of Wolves to Yellowstone; Good or Bad? Reintroduction of Wolves to Yellowstone National Park: Good or Bad? Introduction: Wolves have always been a scape goat to human beings since as far as we can remember, remember the story of the boy who cried wolf? As such they have always been hunted by us and seen to be a menace. However, in recent years this view has begun changing. As such wolf reintroduction schemes have begun in many places, one such place is Yellowstone National park in Wyoming. The wolves in Yellowstone National Park were no different. In 1926 the last of the wolves there were killed by the army and the removal of the top predator in the area had obviously effected the ecosystem. However, in 1995 an initiative by the American government finally came into play: wolf reintroduction to Yellowstone National Park. As such, there were changes to the ecosystem; differing societal views; and economic factors in hand. However, there are two major changes here: firstly, the effects after the reintroduction of the wolves; and, secondly, the effects of the extinction of the wolves in the area. ...read more.


Also, this was the natural ecosystem in Yellowstone and it was by the interference of humans that this natural balance was shifted and so the reintroduction is in essence, humans undoing their original mistake. Effects on Society/Economic Factors The ranch owners in Wyoming, the home of Yellowstone, were firmly against the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone. This was because they felt they were viscous creatures that only killed their cattle and were seen as a major threat to their business. This statistically has been found to be in accurate. It was due to this strong opposition, which is now even going on in other area of the world were wolf reintroduction is being tried, like New Mexico, that the wolf reintroduction programme look long to happen. [8] In 1987 Defenders of Wildlife introduced the ?wolf compensation fund? that eased ranch owners and lifted some of the burden cause by wolves to be eased. They used donations to pay ranch owners the amount of money their cattle would sell for based on average cost of the animal in that year. A final reintroduction plan came together in 1994, after two decades of dispute (the original wolf reintroduction team was put together by the government in 1974). ...read more.


However as the number of pups that are able to survive is ever fluctuating this suggests that the wolves can still survive. In addition, the fact that wolves can not be shot inside the park means that the packs that are within the park will still flourish and so the land within the park would have the strongest of packs as these lands would be the lands that the wolves would want most. This means, that the wolf species within the National Park itself will, in a worst case scenario, still be able to survive and not only will they survive but they will be the strongest of the wolves in the area whilst the wolves outside the park will die out. However, this still allows the benefits to the ecosystem within Yellowstone to benefit. Overall, this therefore suggests that the wolves were without doubt a viable investment by the government and the reintroduction was of benefit. Conclusion To conclude, the wolves of Yellowstone were without doubt worth it and their reintroduction had resulted into a host of benefits. Benefits like the stronger wider ecosystem at Yellowstone, the increase in visitors to Yellowstone to name a few. It is without doubt that the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park is a very good thing and it was most certainly worth it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Energy, Respiration & the Environment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Energy, Respiration & the Environment essays

  1. Field trip report Mangrove ecosystem

    Record the speed of wind by holding hand-held wind meter against the wind. Note also the direction of the wind. d. With the aid of a trowel, dig a sample of soil. e. Measure the soil pH by pH meter, or simply just using pH paper.

  2. Weed study. Dandelions - descrption and characteristics. Investigation to dandelion distribution.

    Apparatus > 1 divided quadrat (20 squares, 0.25 m) - This was made from steel, and was actually quite strong. Hence, it is ideal to use if it was to rain. It would still be god enough to use. The grids which were present were quite reliable, and easy to use.

  1. Aspects of the Ecology of the Shingle beach at Greatstone

    be no significant difference between the environment and its affect on the height of inflorescence of False Oat grass (arrhenatherum elatius). Using = t = Difference between means ?(Variance of Beach data /Sample number + Variance of Inland data/Sample number). t = 200-128.8 ?(1659.83/15 +1014.55/15)

  2. The purpose of this coursework was to investigate the impact visitors have had on ...

    Once this was worked out, a 30cm ruler was used to measure the sorrel height in its natural position. 7. Light meter measures the light intensity. Place the sensor at a 90� angle next to line transect where the sorrel plant is growing. Value in lux read off the scale.

  1. Effect of Tourism on Sea Turtles

    Another, more effective solution has to be found. There has to be solution which permits tourism but also permits a healthy growth of turtle numbers. Iztuzu beach in Dalyan, a 4.5km stretch of stunning golden sand, is the second most important site for endangered loggerhead turtles [8].

  2. Paperbark Swamp Ecosystem

    It costs up to $20,000 for a kilometre and requires regular maintenance and service. Shooting of foxes is helpful but it is only going to control a small part of the fox population. Only foxes which are seen can be shot which is not a feasible way to estimate fox numbers.

  1. Malaria Issue Report

    Solutions to the Problem There are several methods of treating malaria and these are some of the best methods to protect us from the disease: Nets A mosquito net protects against mosquitos, flies, and other airborne insects. Mosquito nets are the first line of defence against the deadly bite of mosquitos.

  2. Investigation into how Lichen growth is affected as you move further away from a ...

    Instead, he or she would be forced to count a smaller representative part of the population, called a sample. A suitable size of a quadrat depends on the size of the organisms being sampled. For example, to count lichens, one could use a quadrat with sides 0.5 or 1 meter in length.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work