• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this experiment is to find the optimum temperature of the reaction between amylase and starch.

Extracts from this document...


Aim: The aim of this experiment is to find the optimum temperature of the reaction between amylase and starch. The optimum temperature is the temperature at which the reaction between amylase and starch takes place the fastest. The reaction consists of 'the breaking down of starch into maltose by Amylase'. Starch is made up of hundreds of glucose molecules joined together to form long chains called Polysaccharides. The Amylase breaks down these into smaller chains of molecules called Disaccharides creating Maltose. Hypothesis: I think that the optimum temperature of the reaction between amylase and starch would be about 37�C because amylase is an enzyme which is located inside the pancreas in the body, whose optimum temperature is 37�C. Amylase is a large soluble protein enzyme, which is a biological catalyst. A catalyst is something which speeds up a reaction but does not use up itself to do so, which in this case, would be the breakdown of insoluble starch into the soluble substance maltose by Amylase. Enzymes break down starch because each amylase enzyme has a shape that matches the shape of each starch molecule. This helps them to react together. In this case, the Starch molecule would be called the substrate. The substrate fits onto the 'active site' on the amylase enzyme. Each enzyme has its own special shape: The lock and key mechanism allows the substrate to fit into the enzymes active site like a jigsaw. The enzyme breaks the substrate into two new molecules. Enzymes can only work in certain conditions. ...read more.


To do this, I placed two test tubes in a beaker filled with water. One test tube contained 5cm� of starch solution and 10 drops of Iodine. The other test tube contained 1cm� of Amylase. I also placed a thermometer in the beaker. (I had placed the Starch and the Amylase in after having measured the right quantities in syringes. I used a dropping pipette to put in the 10 drops of iodine indicator). I then heated up the water in the beaker by placing it on top of a Bunsen burner and heating up the water until it reached a temperature of 25�C. I then left the two test tubes in the beaker for 5 minutes, so that they could reach equilibrium. After that, I put the content of both test tubes into 1 test tube and kept them in the water. I counted how many minutes and seconds it would take for the reaction to take place by using a stopwatch. To do this, I watched the colour of the solution of Starch, Iodine and Amylase. (I did this process with each temperature). I stopped my stopwatch when the solution had turned colourless. At the beginning, in all eight conditions, the reaction had not taken place yet so the Amylase hadn't turned Starch into maltose yet. This meant that since the starch was still present, the Iodine showed this by turning the solutions blue/black. ...read more.


fact that the amylase had formed a lump at the bottom of the test tube and had not mixed with the starch for the reaction to take place. If I was going to do this experiment again I would improve it by using a different technique of heating than a Bunsen burner to heat up the water, such as a hot plate which was controlled by a thermostat. This would be better because it would keep the temperature constant throughout the whole experiment, which is likely to improve it by getting more accurate results. I could also have improved it by stirring the solution much more frequently so that lumps do not occur. I would do this by using a magnetic stirrer. To avoid the iodine problem in future, I would most definitely keep adding iodine. I could improve the experiment by making sure the measurements of the volume if liquid in the syringes is correct, so as to get more precise answers as well as making sure there is the exact same concentration of starch in each dose; since it is insoluble, the concentration may have differed in each dose if not stirred a lot each time. Although I did not find any anomalous results, in future I would do the experiment at least twice to make sure my results are accurate and there have been no mistakes. I could make further investigations by finding the optimum temperature of different enzymes like protease and lipase. I could also find the pH of different enzymes. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Molecules & Cells section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Molecules & Cells essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    effect of concentration of copper sulphate on the action of amylase to break down ...

    4 star(s)

    As concentration increases from 0.1% to 1.0% of copper sulphate, the time taken increases from 450 seconds to 926 seconds. This means the rate of reaction is decreasing when the concentration of copper sulphate increases. There is an anomaly result when concentration is 0.8% as it rises to 1406 seconds.

  2. Aim: To try to see if the temperature affects the rate in which Amylase ...

    The test for glucose should also be carried out fairly even though it is not part of the reaction. A control should be made showing iodine being used on the starch when fully digested to glucose. This would be essential as it enables comparison with iodine used on starch and the iodine used on glucose.

  1. Theeffects of amylase concentration on the breakdown of starch

    Eye protection must be worn at all times. All chemicals must be kept in clearly labelled containers to avoid confusion and save time. Pilot experiment . Due to time restrictions, it is necessary to ensure all time available is efficiently used. To do this I must firstly ensure I am using the optimum temperature for the amylase enzyme,

  2. 'Investigating how temperature affects the rate action of the amylase enzyme on starch.'

    Thus I must be careful when handling it and not to endanger any individual. * I must not communicate with any other classmate except from the colleagues of whom I'm working with; * I must keep my bag in the cupboard, so that it is not a potential hazard in the pathway.


    And wear a lab coat during the whole of the experiment. Write down your results and continue this experiment for a non-biological washing powder. Compare these results to the control and repeat the experiment for more accuracy. Conclusion: After looking at my results it is clear to me that my prediction was correct.

  2. Investigating the Rate of Reaction of the Enzyme Amylase on starch

    As well as this I require 210cm3 starch 1%. 1% Starch 1% of 210 = 2.1 Therefore I need to mix 2.1g of starch powder with 210cm3 of distilled water to make up a 1% solution. Variable 2- Amylase Concentration Amylase Concentration (%)

  1. Investigate the effect of temperature on the breakdown of starch by amylase, and to ...

    The same can be said for reactions controlled by enzymes, but because enzymes are proteins if the temperature exceeds 50� C the enzyme will be denatured and will no longer work. For this reason few cells can tolerate temperatures higher than approximately 45� C.

  2. Investigate how effectively the enzyme amylase breaks down starch at different temperatures, and therefore ...

    Most reactions speed up as the temperature rises. However when an enzyme gets to hot, it looses its shape and stops working. This is when the enzyme has denatured. The extra energy at temperatures of 45�C and above make the enzyme vibrate more rapidly, the shaking breaks some of the week bonds holding it in shape.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work