• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To Investigate the Factors which Determine the stopping Distance of Rollers down a Ramp.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To Investigate the Factors      which Determine the stopping Distance of Rollers down a Ramp

image00.png

Theory-

When the roller is rolling down the slope then potential energy is converted to kinetic energy that converts into heat energy.

MGH = ½MVsquared

The loss of kinetic energy on the carpet is ….

½MVsquared = braking force  x braking distance

therefore….

½Mvsquared = F x

so MGH = F x

If m, g and f are constant then….image15.png

However if G is constant then….image16.png

So….image17.png

This relation ship can be tested for a fixed angle, roller mass and fixed carpet.

Predictions-

In this experiment, before it was conducted and results were obtained , I predicted that  for all the rollers, that the stopping distance would be directly proportional to the distance up the ramp. This prediction can be tested by plotting a graph of the results.

Variables and Constants in the Experiment

Variables

Constants

Distance up ramp

Type of carpet

Distance along carpet

Angle ‘G’

Mass of roller

Type of metal

To maintain a fair test these are the procedures I  had -

  • 1 fixed angle
  • 1 set of rollers
  • to make sure that the ruler was at the bottom of the ramp
  • A fixed interval (3,6,9ect….)

To find out if my predictions were correct, I conducted an experiment. It was set up as follows;

image01.png

image08.png

image07.png

image09.pngimage10.png

image11.png

         The Experimentimage13.pngimage03.pngimage14.pngimage04.pngimage12.pngimage02.pngimage07.pngimage05.pngimage06.png

Aim –

to investigate the factors, which determine the stopping distance of rollers down a ramp

Apparatus-

  1. 3 rollers, all made from steel
  2. I ramp
  3. 2 meter rules
  4. a stretch of carpet
...read more.

Middle

image02.pngimage14.pngimage05.pngimage06.pngimage07.png

Aim –

to investigate the factors, which determine the stopping distance of rollers down a ramp

Apparatus-

  1. 3 rollers, all made from steel
  2. I ramp
  3. 2 meter rules
  4. a stretch of carpet
  5. a set square – to measure up to the half way point on the roller

Method -  

  1. select a type of  roller, and do not change it
  2. weigh a roller
  3. put the ramp at an angle, and keep it as a constant
  4. place the roller on to the ramp, and let go of it at a known distance.
  5. Record the distance from the bottom of the ramp to the half way point of the roller because the centre of gravity is in the middle.  Do this five times and the find the average distance. (This was repeated five times, because there is no exact distance a roller will go from a certain height.)

Analysis  -

  • Graph 1 (184g roller)-The results when plotted on a graph show a straight line. This means that there is a definite relationship between the distance up a ramp, and the stopping distance for a roller of a mass of 184g. If however the results showed a definite curve, then this would not be the case.

To find the relationship I rounded each of the averages to a whole numbers-

Distance up slope

Average

Rounded up figure

Increase of stopping distance

3

11.3

11

-

6

15.0

15

4

9

19.5

20

5

12

23.4

23

4

15

27.4

27

4

18

33.4

33

5

21

37.8

38

5

24

41.8

42

4

27

53.5

54

12

...read more.

Conclusion

Average

Rounded up figure

Increase of stopping distance

3

6.2

6

-

6

9.9

10

4

9

13.1

13

3

12

16.5

17

5

15

20.2

20

3

18

25.5

26

6

21

28.9

29

3

24

32.8

33

4

27

35.2

35

2

30

38.8

39

4

These results were very scattered, and so to find the relationship I thought that it would be best if I found an average of the increase in stopping distance. This came out to be 3.78 rounded up which equals 4. This means that the stopping distance generally increased by 4, as the distance up the slope increased by 3.

This proves that there is a relationship between the stopping distance and the distance up a ramp.

  • Graph 4

Here I plotted all the results from the previous rollers on to one graph. This was to en able me to find a relationship between the stopping distance, and the point at which a roller of a known mass was rolled from. I think that this helped me, as I could analyse each line of results together, instead of separately.

Conclusion

There is a relationship between the stopping distance of a roller, and the height from which it was rolled at. This also proves my prediction before I conducted the experiment.

It also means that there are very little outside or unknown factors affecting the stopping distance of the roller.

However I was not happy with the results for the last roller. This was because the results were to scattered. If I had the opportunity then I would get a second set of results for this roller.

I think that the 2nd roller went the furthest, because the first roller had more surface area in contact with the carpet, and so slowed it down.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Aim:To find out whether or not the angle of the ramp affects the acceleration ...

    3 star(s)

    There were some problems and I have ideas on how they can be improved. A problem was that the ticker timer and the ticker tape were causing a frictional effect on the trolley. This problem can be solved with the aid of light gates as these are newer; more accurate and easier to read.

  2. Factors affecting the speed of a trolley Travelling down a ramp.

    That means for a twofold increase in speed, the kinetic energy will increase by a factor of 4; for a threefold increase in speed, the kinetic energy will increase by a factor of 9. The kinetic energy is dependent upon the square of the speed.

  1. Objectives: To determine the center of gravity of a body of irregular shapes

    As the holes become bigger, it is easier for us to find out the center. However, we should not make the hole become too large, otherwise, inaccurate lines that connect the intersection points are drawn. In this experiment, there are some assumptions we had made.

  2. Use of technology in a hospital radiology department. The department of imaging is one ...

    The department is the main treatment centre in north London. o Gastroenterology department;- this department provides an extensive range of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic services such as pancereatico-biliary medicine, hepatology, inflammatory bowel disease and nutrition. o Respiratory medicine;- this department offer a full inpatient and outpatient medical service for adults

  1. The target of my coursework is to find the amount of g acting on ...

    Equation of Motion: v^2 = u^2 + 2 a s And acceleration=g And u=0 Therefore: v^2 = 2 (g sin ?) s final equation: g = v^2 / (2 * sin? * s) Using the Equation I have worked out, I shall work out g for the tables shown previously.

  2. In this report I will start by exploring the history of the Computerised Tomography ...

    According to the radiographer Jonida Cama at Basildon and Thurrock University hospital, CT scanner save millions of lives each year by providing early diagnosis to life threatening disease such as tumours, thoracic and abdomen defects. In this chapter we have only mentioned the applications; there are also limitations which should be noted.

  1. physics investigation- stopping distance

    gradient of ramp, height dropped from) Test 1 In my first test I will be testing ball 1 of radius 2 cm and mass of 2.8g, against ball 2 of radius 2 cm and mass of 44.9g. I will be dropping the ball from 30cm up the ramp with gradient of 24.4�, my results are: Ball 1 (cm)

  2. Investigating the Inverse Square Law

    15.00 1000 180 220 205 201.67 20.00 1000 317 355 345 339.00 25.00 1000 457 469 437 454.33 30.00 1000 543 510 542 531.67 35.00 1000 749 720 735 734.67 From these preliminary results I have decided to time for 10,000 counts at 5 cm from the source, 5000 counts

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work