• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Winning a Metal from it's Ore

Extracts from this document...


Title: Winning a Metal from its Ore Introduction: The initial purpose of the lab is to extract the most copper out of a given amount of malachite, the ore copper is found in. Metals are naturally found in rock called ore. To extract the metal from the ore two processes take place, smelting and roasting. Roasting is a process in which heat is used to decompose ions that are combined. The reaction for the roasting portion of this lab is. . Another method of extracting a metal from ore is smelting. The process of smelting uses heat and a reducing agent (in this case carbon) to extract the element itself. The reaction for the smelting process in this lab is. Hypothesis: Two initial hypotheses can be made. The first one is predicts the mass of CuO, shown in the work below. The predicted mass of CuO is 0.72g. ...read more.


Add the carbon black to the cooled contents of the crucible, mix together thoroughly using a clean, dry stirring rod. Be sure to scrape off any solid that clings to the stirring rod back into the crucible. 2. Return the crucible to the clay triangle and begin heating again. When evidence of a chemical reaction appears, watch carefully. (You should hold the crucible cover with crucible tongs to better observe the process. If particulate matter is emitted, cover quickly.) Heat strongly for 5 more minutes. Then turn off the burner, and using tongs, quickly pour the contents of the crucible into a 50 mL beaker containing 40 mL water. (You may need to scrape the crucible with the spatula to free some of the material. 3. Decant the water carefully. Rinse the product with water and decant carefully two more times. Place the beaker with product on a hot plate set at 4-5 in order to dry the beaker and product. ...read more.


- Percent Yield of Cu o * * To find the percent yield of the copper we took our actual yield and divided by the theoretical yield derived from stochiometric calculation. * Yes this method for the most part was efficient however, I do think that the actual transfer from the crucible into the beaker of water and when removing the carbon copper was lost thus lowering the percent yield. Conclusion: The copper initially was in fact pure copper. By comparing it to the samples by making qualitative observations we concluded that the copper recovered did share many properties hence making it pure copper. The most likely location of error occurred towards the end of the procedure during the transfer of the copper from the crucible to beaker and the removal of carbon. For the most part there really isn't anyway to eliminate error. Mainly because the error most likely occurred when the copper wasn't quite a solid so if we had waited for the crucible to cool and transfer then we would of lost even more copper. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry essays

  1. effects Concentration and Temperature on the Rate of Reaction

    Artificial respiration may be needed. Refer for medical attention. Contact with skin Corrosive. Redness. Pain. Blisters. Serious skin burns. Protective gloves. Protective clothing. Remove contaminated clothes. Rinse skin with plenty of water or shower. Refer for medical attention. Contact with eyes Corrosive. Redness. Pain. Severe deep burns. Face shield or eye protection in combination with breathing protection.

  2. ethanedioate complex of iron

    Procedure for the reactions of the complex Oxalate Three tests tubes with our product and three with iron(III) chloride were prepared and marked correspondingly. Dilute sodium hydroxide, ammonium thiocyanate, and ammonium thiocyanate with dilute sulphuric acid were added separately into each of the three test tubes containing our product and the three containing iron(III)

  1. decomposition of copper carbonate

    * use the Bunsen burner careful and turn on safety flame when not in use * wear goggles and lab coat all the time. * when something is spoiled it should be rinsed up immediately * wear your hair looped up * apparatus may be hot Apparatus list * 1

  2. Chemistry - Data Analysis

    41 45 45 45 45 45 46 28 41 45 45 30 40 39 40 44 43 44 44 44 45 30 40 44 44 These results were then plotted on graphs and these were then analysed for the purpose of deriving a meaningful relationship between the materials and their ability to lose heat.

  1. Decomposition of Copper Carbonate on Heating

    expect to collect an amount of gas roughly equal to 64 cm3. Due to limitations on the equipment that is practically available, there will be some scope for error in the readings taken from the experiment. Using weighing scales accurate to .001g means that there is a possible error of �0.0005g.

  2. Preparation and analysis of a complex metal salt

    Determination of metal content Part B was repeated except that no indicator was added this time. The solution was kept at pH 10 and the solution was diluted. EDTA titration was carried out after the solution was heated to 60oC.

  1. The Effects of Strong and Weak Acids on the Order of a Reaction.

    Activation energy number becoming positive sure to the negative signs in the equation. Working out the Rate of a Reaction The rate of a reaction can be determined by doing the 'Rate Equation'. This is an equation which has gained by doing experiments and finding out the ratios between the concentrations of the substances.

  2. Thermal Decomposition of Copper Crabonate

    Volume (dm�) = Number of Moles x 24 (dm�) We know that in equation 1, the number of moles of gas given off is 0.003340080975 , and that in equation 2, the number of moles of gas given off is 0.00267206478.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work