However not all of the factors could be inside of the classroom. Sue Sharpe (1994) believes that girls priorities have in fact changed in recent years thanks to the number of working female role models today. This causes them to aspire to be financially independent, motivating them to work harder. Females are also known to spend more time on activities such as reading or communicating in their spare time, developing their language skills, as opposed to boys who spend a majority of the time being physically active (Parsons, 2004, p.55).
Class has been found to be a major factor in affecting pupils' performance, with students from a professional background achieving substantially better grades than those from an unskilled background, making them more likely to enter higher education. Labelling can also have an effect here too, as Bali (1981) found that the top subjects sets of students were largely from higher social classes. This means that the working classes do not have the same access to higher levels of knowledge, potentially sparking a self-fulling prophecy of underachievement. As a response to this, anti-school subcultures may form amongst working class students, further lowering educational achievement as a result.
However, there are factors at home that could contribute. Firstly is the theory of material deprivation, the idea that some children do less well because of their financial circumstance. Working class pupils without private study space at home, or materials such as books and a computer, may not do as well as those from more comfortable backgrounds - nor can their parents afford to support them through university. It can also be argued that lack of nutritious food in a poorer household may also affect the performance of the child at school (Parsons, 2004, p.55).
On the other hand, it may be a case of cultural deprivation, which argues that the working class culture is not aimed towards educational achievement. Educated middle-class parents are more likely to encourage their children and attend open evenings at the schools, having higher values for education than the working class. This parental knowledge could also be helpful in helping children with homework and guiding them through school, something that working class children do not have access to. Another cultural factor could be the language code, as Bernstein (1970) found. Working class pupils were found not to be comfortable with the style of language required by their school, so instead talk in a restricted code that is more familiar with them. The middle-class pupils tend to be more well-spoken, using the same elaborated code as their teachers (Parsons, 2004, p.55). This correct use of language, and a more positive attitude and use of knowledge is what Bourdieu (1971, 1974) called "cultural capital". He believed that having cultural capital is the key to success and is something that working class children can not easily access.
In conclusion, there are many socio-economic factors that can contribute to educational achievement. We have found that gender is a major factor and that girls tend to achieve higher than boys, but that it can also be a combination of reasons behind the pupils' class background, with a number of factors both in school and at home that can affect achievement.
Reference List
Books:
Parsons, R (2004) AS Level Sociology: AQA Revisions Guide, UK: CGP Publishings Ltd.
Websites:
First ever FALL in top GCSE grades,
Available online at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2192383/GCSE-results-2012-First-fall-grades-exams-24-year-history-teachers-claim-tests-marked-harshly.html [Accessed 07 November 2012].
Bibliography
Bilton T, Bonnet K, Jones P, Skinner D, Stanworth M, Webster A (1981), Introductory Sociology, Macmillan Press Ltd.
Csaky T, Hallam G, Von Kotze L, Reed K (2001) A2 Level Sociology: Exam Board AQA, UK: CGP Publishings Ltd.
Cameron J, Peace M, Flowers T, Watts D, Wright M, Hart M, Renton N (2008), AQA A2 Sociology, UK: Nelson Thornes