Assess childhood is not a fixed universal experience

Authors Avatar

Assess the view that childhood in not a fixed universal experience.

Childhood, based on sociologist opinions is that it is not a fixed universal experience, this is called social construct, meaning that the ideas about what childhood is varied according to time, location, gender, ethnicity and social class. This is a relative and not an absolute concept. So basically each individual’s society differently defines childhood and determines how the children should be treated.

In the Pre-industrial times, children were seen as little adults, and they took part in the same work and play activities as the adults. As soon as the children were physically able they would be sent to do labouring in the fields. They were seen as a unit of production. The children’s leisure time was short and for them life was very hard. Phillipe Aries (1962) says that children were regarded as an economic asset rather than a symbol of love for one another. He argues that ‘childhood’ as we understand it today is a new invention. In the middle ages childhood did not exist, the children were treated exactly the same as the adults such as they ate the same food, wore the same clothes and were punished the same.

Join now!

Aries claimed that childhood began from the early 13th century as fee-paying schools were open to provide education for the rich. The church also began to separate children from adults as saying that they needed to be punished differently,

This then led into the early industrial times, with the industrial revolution (1760s onwards) the position of children had changed, but this certainly wasn’t for the better. Children were still made to work, but now not in fields but in factories, coalmines and up chimneys. There were no laws to protect the children from this, as the children were seen to be ...

This is a preview of the whole essay