• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess sociological explanations of the different crime rates of men and women.

Free essay example:

Assess sociological explanations of the different crime rates of men and women.

Whilst men are not convicted more often than women for all types of crime (e.g. women are more likely to shop lift), in general, an analysis of crime statistics shows that men are convicted of crime far more often than women, and this trend is apparent across all ages, ethnicities, social classes and regions of the UK. For instance, women only make up 6% of the prison population, and in 2001, 167 per 10,000 of the male population were found guilty or cautioned for an offence compared to 3.7 per 10,000 of the female population. Indeed, these statistics do not always give an accurate picture of which gender is more likely to commit crimes, but self-report studies, too, show a noticeable difference between offending levels of males and females.

Sociologists and criminologists have tried to explain just why this significant difference in crime rates between men and women exists. One theory is that of “sex-role” theory. This theory argues that women are less likely to commit crime than men because there are core elements of the female role that limit their ability and opportunity to do so. Talcott Parsons argues how the values that girls are brought up on are values which do not lead to crime. He points to the fact that as most child-rearing is carried out by mothers, girls have a clear role model to follow that emphasizes caring and support. This idea of “socialization” forms a key part to functionalist theory in general, where institutions like schools and religion are said to play a vital role in achieving social harmony.

The work of Farrington and Painter supports Parson’s views on the role of socialization. They conducted a longitudinal study of female offenders which led them to find that female offenders were much more likely to have had harsh or erratic parenting, and to have had little support or praise from their parents for their achievements at school and in their community. Therefore we can see that the role of socialization (a part of sex-role theory) provides at least some explanation as to why there are different crime rates between men and women.

Abbot and Wallace, however, claim that young women are more closely watched by their families and are given less freedom outside the home - reducing their opportunities for crime. This idea of “social control” which, like socialization, is linked in with sex-role theory provides an example of how by focusing on small-scale human interactions (interactionism) behaviour in society can be explained. Hagan’s study of child-raising patterns in Canada provides another example of the study of small-scale human interactions, whilst also providing evidence to support Abbot and Wallace’s theory. Hagan found that there was significantly greater informal control of daughters’ activities in families compared to sons’, therefore, it could quite legitimately be said that social control (particularly at a younger age) is an important factor influencing the different crime rates between men and women.

Having said that, Ian Marsh (1986) claims that men commit more crime because they have more opportunities to do so. Men are typically more independent throughout their lives when compared to women, who, in contrast, are marginalized in a narrower range of roles. Feminists would claim women are marginalized in more restricted roles (such as motherly, caring roles) because we live in a patriarchal society which limits females’ opportunities. Evidence which Marsh uses to support his view is that women more frequently handle stolen goods because they have more opportunities to sell and use stolen goods, therefore, if women were to have the same amount of opportunities as men to commit crimes, then they would commit the same, or a similar amount, of crimes.

In contrast to all of the sociological explanations for the different rates of crime between the two genders, there are in fact biological explanations as to why there is a gender difference in crime, all of which challenge the sociological, sex-role theories. These biological explanations start from the belief that women are innately different from men. ‘Normal’ women have a natural desire to be caring, and therefore, women do not commit as much crime as men. These biological explanations therefore provide a challenge to some of the other theories discussed in this essay, which, instead, assume ones’ desire to commit crime are shaped and determined by social influences.

Indeed, when examining the difference between mens’ and womens’ crime rates, it can be all too easy to focus purely on why women appear to commit much less crime than men. However, Katz, a postmodernist, has looked at the “seductions of crime”. He claims that when young men are unsure of exactly who they are and what their place in society is they can turn to crime (particularly dangerous, risky crime like robbery) as it can provide a thrill which is a welcome break from boredom. Lyng builds on the ideas of Katz by arguing that young males search for pleasure through risk-taking (“edgework”). He argues that there is a thrill to be gained from acting in dangerous, insecure ways which inadvertently allows these young men to “accomplish masculinity”.

Both Lyng and Katz’s work has, however, been criticized for not slotting the notions of masculinities into a context. In other words, they do not, for example, explain why young working-class males are more likely to be violent than older middle-class males. Winlow claims the answer to this question is that a significant amount of the male working class population has been excluded from the low level, white collar jobs which have resulted from changes in the structure of the economy. According to Wilson, this has resulted in the development of an urban underclass who manifest a range of violent and antisocial behaviours.

It is clear therefore that there are a number of different sociological explanations for the different crime rates between men and women. These explanations focus upon the social influences which cause women to commit crime, and the social influences which cause men to commit crime, whilst each view takes a different theoretical approach in trying to explain the differences.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Sociology Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Asses the arguments and evidence which suggest women commit much less crime than men

    4 star(s)

    If she doesn't want it she only has to keep her legs shut." Judge Wilde, p.412. Although these views have been disregarded by Otto Pollack (1950), which is discussed later, it has been supported by Sandra Walkate (1995), who believed that instead of the male offender, it was the female victim whom ended up on trial.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    At the same time despite the ideology of meritocracy the poor are systematically excluded from opportunities to gain the glittering prizes of a wealthy society. Young's contrast between cultural inclusion and economic exclusion is similar to Merton's notion of anomie - that society creates crime by setting cultural goals such

  1. Assess sociological explanations of social class differences in crime rates

    Diffusion of responsibility; a single individual is rarely blamed, punishment is often widespread * Diffusion of victimisation; many corporate crimes are described as victimless, as they do not appear to overtly negatively affect people like murder and robbery does Because of these

  2. Stratification of crime. Most crime is committed by teenagers. Men are convicted of more ...

    this pattern crosses all other social factors such as age, class, ethnicity and region. The subcultures theories of Miller (1962) and Merton (1968) argue that the culture and lifestyles of young men encourage and lead to crime (remember, most crime is committed by the young).

  1. Assess the Sociological explanations of social class differences

    Murray, a right realist, claims that an underclass is emerging in modern western societies and these r to blame for crime rates. He defines an underclass not simply by those with the lowest income at the base of class system; instead it consists of those with low income who behave

  2. Using Item A and elsewhere, assess different sociological explanations of suicide

    when a person?s educational attainment level are compatible with their occupation, and they predict that in societies where there is little status integration, there will be a higher rate of suicide. Durkheim?s method has also since been criticised because when Durkheim was studying suicide rates, there wasn?t the technology to

  1. Poverty and Crime rates

    Another reason why people who cannot afford what they want is due to the impact of jealousy on the lower income community?s mind. For example, Kristopher Gutierrez beat one of his best friends after realizing that he had a relationship with his girlfriend Kristopher is charged for aggravated assault1.

  2. Assess the Sociological explanations of the differing patterns of male and female criminality.

    The actual official statistics themselves show that men?s criminality is higher. Therefore, suggesting that gender is the most important factor in determining criminality, so males are studied closer then women. She points out that crime is a male dominated field, and also so is research.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work