• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of questionnaires, as a research method

Extracts from this document...


Assess the strengths and weaknesses of questionnaires, as a research method Questionnaires are the most commonly used form of collecting data, as they are useful for gathering large quantities of basic educational information quickly and cheaply. They can be sent to people at home, completed then returned by post, emailed to you online or completed on the spot. For example, in a shopping centre, someone may approach you with a clip board and ask you a set of questions to answer there and then. The people completing the questionnaires are known as respondents, who are asked to provide answers to pre-set questions. Questionnaires can fit into two types of categories; structured or semi-structured questionnaires. A structured questionnaire has a fixed response. This means that there is either a box to tick or the answer is either yes or no. These types of questionnaires are liked by positivists. Positivists believe that society is made up of 'social facts' that can be studied scientifically to discover laws of cause and effect. They prefer this type of questionnaire as it gives you quantitative data (data in statistical or numerical form). ...read more.


Additionally, the theoretical issues also have two sides. Positivists prefer using questionnaires are they are easy to categorise. Although, the common mistake of asking too many questions should be avoided as they will lead to the respondent, giving up half way through or not completing it altogether. On the other hand, interpretivists believe that questionnaires lack validity as asking a question with a only a yes or no answer, does not produce a true or genuine picture of what somebody really thinks or believes. This does not let the researcher get close to the respondents meaning or feelings. This is why interpretivists prefer semi-structured questionnaires, as they can then ask why, following the question. However, open-ended questions, such as 'why' questions, can take a long time to analyse and collect data from. Moreover, we also need to look at the advantages and disadvantages of ethical issues, relating to questionnaires. Ethical issues refer to the moral issues of right and wrong. Questionnaires need to make sure they follow the following principles, set by the British Sociological Association about ethics. ...read more.


For example, sending out a million questionnaires will give you a bigger range of information and will make it easy to generalise; rather than, interviewing a million people, which is time-consuming and could take years. Also, it would be hard to categorise how the people feel, as many people might say different things or not relate to one another. Furthermore, questionnaires are also good in the education system, as if a child is getting bullied and is afraid to say, then an anonymous questionnaire might let them speak out about how they feel. Questionnaire response rates can often be higher in schools, than in other areas because once the head teacher has given their consent and put their authority behind the research, then teachers and pupils may be under pressure to cooperate. In conclusion, sociologists believe questionnaires are useful to obtain a large amount of opinion, quickly and cheaply. Although, if they want to understand more about a particular topic or understand the meaning and feelings of the participants, with a more in-depth, informative response, then they will use interviews or participant observation, to involve themselves in the research and to be able to have a full conversation, face-to-face, with the participant themselves. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ayshe Caluda ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of interviews, as a research method

    For example, the interviewer has complete freedom to vary the questions and ask why. They can use questions which they feel are appropriate to ask and which give a deeper meaning response. A practical advantage for unstructured interviews is that because there are no set questions, it allows the interviewer

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation, as a research method

    Therefore, sociologists use the German word 'verstehen', (meaning 'empathy') to understand the meaning of putting yourself in another person's place. Compared to questionnaires and having pre-set questions, the researcher can start an observation with a relatively open mind about what they will find.

  1. Demography topic revision notes. The study of populations and their characteristics is called ...

    As the number of retired people rises, this increases the dependency ratio and the burden on the working population. However, it would be wrong to assume that 'old' necessarily equals 'economically dependent'. Foe example, the age at which people retire can vary - about one in 10 men in their

  2. Choice of research method. here are various types of research methods available, such ...

    As such, interpretivist sees qualitative research method as most appropriate way of research as it allows them to understand the meanings and motives of action. For example, an interview conducted by Howard S. Becker to study marijuana smokers allowed him to discover the motives and circumstances that led them to try drug and continue using it.

  1. Interview is a form of research method which involves interaction between interviewer and respondents ...

    This is because respondent are able to think more deeply about their answers and reflect critically upon them in their responses to others' answers. Hence, both forms of interview are seen to be high in validity. However, it is criticized that data produced in interview may be neither valid nor reliable.

  2. Examine the usefulness of Social Surveys as a research method.

    If the questionnaires were collected back by the researcher themselves, then they could increase the response rate.

  1. Research Methods - the strengths and weaknesses of unstructured interviews.

    being influenced or distorted in some way because of the presence or behaviour of the interviewer), social desirability (this is when the interviewee denies socially undesirable traits or qualities to make himself look better) and not structuring the questions to be bias or leading or the participant will not give the validating information we need, hence rendering the information false.

  2. Sociological research methods - questionnaires

    parent, in this instance, may then try to please or attempt to second guess the researchers aims, leading to further invalid results. Statements can then be produced from the questionnaires which will either prove or disprove the hypothesis, and a ?cause-and-effect? relationship can be gathered from relevant information and variables.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work