• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society. (33marks) Interactionism is an action approach, which focuses on the individual, and tries to understand and interpret human behaviour. They focus on the study of individuals, and how society is constructed by members? interactions and meanings. They also focus on how human action is meaningful and can be interpreted by an observer. Therefore they take an opposite approach to structural theories and believe individuals have the ability to create society through choice, meaning and action. Symbolic interactionism is concerned with explaining social actions in terms of the meanings that people give to them. Interactions are based on meanings we give to situations. We express these meanings through symbols, especially language. Meanings and symbols allow people to carry out human action and interactions. Language and communication deepens our capacity to become self-aware and aware of others. In addition to ?talking to others? we engage in talking to ourselves?, that is, engaging in internal conversations when we are making decisions. Mead (1863-1931) states that humans use symbols as a mean of interacting. Without these symbols there would be no human interaction and human society. ...read more.


E.g. a student labelled troublesome will be able to see himself in the eyes of the teacher. They will acknowledge that the teacher sees them as troublesome and that is the reason why they are treated harshly. Labelling theorists such as Becker demonstrate that some labels such as ?mentally ill? or ?underachiever? profoundly affect how individuals see themselves, how others perceive them and how they behave in the future. However, the labelling theory has been criticized, as it fails to explain where labels actually originate from. It has also been accused of determinism. The way we act and identify is shaped by the way people label us. It states we act according to labels and whatever people say about us becomes true. However this is not always the case. We don?t always have to accept these labels. We can reject them, or pretend to accept the label by acting according to the label that is given to us, and fooling those who gave us that label. Another criticism is that although it can explain the patterns of groups, such as the negative labelling of some groups in education, it does not explain the origins of labels and meanings in a wider setting of inequality. ...read more.


They tend to think all action is meaningful. Traditional action is performed unconsciously or routinely ? a habit, and has little meaning for actors. If it doesn?t ?mean anything? interactionism lacks the means to explain it; because they state everything has a meaning. The approach concerns itself with common-sense aspects of interaction. Although it can explain the patterns of groups, such as negative labelling of some groups in education, it does not explain the origins of labels and meanings in a wider setting of inequality. Overall, interactionism largely avoids determinism of structuralist theories such as functionalism. Although it can explain micro interpersonal disruptions, it does not account for macro conflicts such as wider patterns of class, gender, ethnicity, age and regional inequalities. Interactionists provide a useful insight into the workings of society but the theory is ideologically driven. Therefore, the theory is reductionist as it fails to take into account competing theoretical ideas. Postmodernists are critical of the interactionist meta-narrative as they claim to have a ?totalising?, (all encompassing), theory of society. Postmodernists maintain that rival narratives should be considered for a full account of social life. As a whole interactionism is regarded as a voluntaristic theory that emphasises on the freewill and choice we have in how we act. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Assess the usefulness of structural approaches to our understanding of society.

    Functionalism recognises the structural nature of society. It demonstrates the links between major social institutions, for example education, religion and the economy. Marxism is a similar structural theory as it studies society as a whole. Although, Marxists are critical of capitalist societies which they see as a society of two parts; the first component is the economic base (infrastructure).

  2. Outline and evaluate the interactionist view of education (40 marks)

    Also, Mac an Ghaill found that negative labelling did not necessarily lead to failure. Teachers labels and assessment of pupils may affect the band or set they are placed in . Ball found that pupils who's fathers were not manual workers were more likely to be placed in top sets.

  1. Outline and Assess Whether stratification is either inevitable or beneficial to individuals and society?

    nature, that suggests people will perform tasks only for monetary or status rewards, they fail to consider people who work because they enjoy their job, and do it because they feel their making a difference in the world such as charity work etc.

  2. Discuss the usefulness of Quantative and Qualitative Methods in study of Suicide.

    of problems when trying to repeat the research or apply it on a large scale. This is a big problem when trying to criticise suicide statistics as the statistics are formed in various countries and these observations can not be applied on that scale.

  1. Gender Roles

    Although gender identity still exists, the roles have completely changed, many females are no longer housewives without control, and men are able to participate within the household. In a modern society, I think that the gender inequality still is clearly evident.


    One of the main strengths of the behaviourist approach is that it focuses only on behaviour that can be observed and manipulated. Therefore, this approach has proved very useful in experiments under laboratory conditions where behaviour can be observed and manipulated, especially in relation to the IV (independent variable)

  1. This essay will evaluate three groups within society; the Feminists, Postmodernists and the Marxists, ...

    The upper and middle classes are the societal groups that gain more from health services than people within the lower classes. This is known as the inverse care law (Le Grand et al., 2008).

  2. What are the functionalist, conflict and symbolic interactionist theory of stratification?

    In other words it tries to justify the inequality in the stratified society. According to functionalist maybe it would be normal to see a rich minister and his poor driver in their level of living and saying each of them serves as an organ of the body works in harmony

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work