• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media and public opinion

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media and public opinion Crime is any action which breaks the laws of society, for example, murder, r**e and theft. Laws are created to protect society while agencies of social control like the police enforce it. Deviance is a much broader term defined as behaviour which moves away from conventional norms and values, and not all deviant behaviour is criminal such as burping in public, and not all crimes are seen as deviant such as speeding. In this essay I will be looking into crime and deviance being the result of labelling, the media and public opinion. I will be concentrating on arguments for and against media and public opinion. In arguments for I will be discussing how the interactionist approach is different, Howard Becker?s labelling theory, deviancy amplification spiral and moral panics. In arguments against I will be looking at Robert Merton?s strain theory, subcultural explanations such as Cohen and Miller and finally looking at David Matza and his delinquency and drift theory. Towards the end of the essay it will come apparent that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media and public opinion. Although there is lots of evidence against the media and public opinion, Howard Becker?s labelling theory explains the media and public opinion well. Interactionist theories concentrate on how behaviours come to be defined as deviant. The interactionist view takes a smaller scale view of society and social order and analyses small or medium scale social interactions. The main idea behind the interactionist approach to deviance is that the definition of what is deviant is socially negotiated (a process). Deviance differs from one culture to another and also across time. It also differs according to where you are and who you are with at any given moment. The second idea in the interactionist approach is that a person?s experience may lead to a deviant career i.e. ...read more.


For Merton, crime and deviance were evidence of a poor fit (or a strain) between the socially accepted goals of society and the socially approved means of obtaining those desired goals, the resulting strain leading to deviance. Merton argued that all societies set their members certain goals and, at the same time, provide socially approved ways of achieving these goals; he pointed out that, in a stratified society, the goals were linked to a person?s position in the social structure. Those lower down had restricted goals. The system worked well as long as there was a reasonable chance that a majority of people were able to achieve their goals. However, if the majority of the population were unable to achieve the socially set goals, then they become dissatisfied with society and looked for an alternative which is often deviant. Merton uses Durkheim?s term anomie to describe this situation. The five following different forms of behaviour could then be understood as a strain between goals: Conformity is where the individual continues to adhere to both goals and means, despite the limited likelihood of success. Innovation is where the person accepts the goals of society but uses different ways to achieve these goals; criminal behaviour is included in this response. Next is ritualism this is when the means are used by the individual, but sight of the actual goal is lost. Retreatism is where the individual rejects both the goals and means, the person dependent upon drugs or alcohol is included in this form of behaviour. Finally is rebellion where both the socially sanctioned goals and means are rejected and different ones are substituted. Writing in the 1950?s, Albert Cohen agreed with Merton and drew upon his ideas of strain and also that there is a working class phenomenon. Cohen was particularly interested in the fact that much offending behaviour was not economically motivated, but simply done for the thrill of the act. ...read more.


They both have their weaknesses but overall I think the interactionist approach is better. In this essay I have not only looked at the arguments for the media and public opinion but also against, as not all theorists agree with each other. In the arguments for, Howard Becker he focuses on the process by which they label certain acts as deviant and that if no act is intrinsically deviant, then it must be the meanings we attach to behaviour that is important. I then went on to look at the deviancy amplification spiral where on some occasions the reporting of crime by the media can create more deviance, and then on to moral panics where I looked at the real life example of the ?Mods? and ?Rockers?. In the arguments against, Robert Merton focuses on crime and deviance where evidence of a poor fit (or a strain) between the socially accepted goals of society and the socially approved means of obtaining those desired goals, where the resulting strain leading to deviance. Other theories I looked into were: Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin, Miller and Matza and the delinquency drift. Considering the arguments and evidence put across I believe that crime is the result of the media and public opinion. As we all know today, that media and public opinion plays a massive role in society when it comes to crime and deviance and its becoming more and more common to see that most crimes are not always from the lower or working classes as suggested by the subcultural theories of crime. While the interactionist explanations look more at the individual rather than a culture or class, and that individuals are getting labelled for their deviant behaviour. The interactionist approach then goes on to give us two explanations for this: the deviancy amplification spiral and moral panics. So this suggests that the media makes us create an opinion about an individual, which in the long run will become internalised. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Who determines social norms and on whom such judgements are most likely to be imposed are questions seldom asked by anyone using a functionalist perspective. Functionalists see deviance as having stabilising repercussions in society, but they tend to overlook the injustices that labelling someone deviant can produce.

  2. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    Retreatist Subculture- Faced with a failure in both mainstream society and in the crime and gang cultures (a double failure), some lower working-class youths will develop a retreatist subculture where they retreat into drugs and alcoholism. Much like Merton's Retreatists.

  1. Critically evaluate the contribution that the Labelling theory has made to our understanding of ...

    First, they claim that mental illness is a label that is applied to the behaviour of certain people in certain circumstances. The mentally ill, are initially a little different from 'normal', it is just they have had the label 'mentally ill attached' to their behaviour, and this has consequences for their self-perception and the ways others treat and perceive them.

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    Locals were irritated by the lack of business and refused to serve some of the youths. The rockers roared up and down the promenade on their motorbikes causing loud noise. Scuffles between the youths eventually broke out resulting in broken windows and vandalised beach huts.

  1. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    However, Miller's theories seem to contradict the very basis of functionalist sociology- that of society based on consensus- through its claim of three separate and distinct cultures with distinct and separate norms, values and behaviour- which at the very least does not seem like consensus in any form.

  2. Assess Interactionist theories of crime and deviance.

    Interactionists believe that agents of social control amplify deviance. Young's study on the police showed how their labelling caused a deviant subculture to emerge as previously integrated members of society were labelled as deviant, rejected by wider society and so grouped together to form a deviant subculture that was more deviant than before.

  1. Examine some of the reasons for the existence of deviant subcultures. Assess the view ...

    And retreatist subculture, where a criminal role is failed, it is often associated with drug use. These theories, combined with the fact that working class males suffer from material deprivation, they are not given the same financial support as their working class counterparts, so therefore right from the start of

  2. Outline and evaluate the view that crime and deviance are socially constructed

    harsher punishments for s****l promiscuity as opposed to the UK who only see the act as liberating or at worse deviant. They adhere to Sharia Law which has a Zina ruling thus meaning s*x outside of marriage is punishable by law (Muslim, 2007).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work