Can or should sociology be a science? What are the arguments for and against the idea?

Authors Avatar by chloeslater (student)

Chloe Slater

Can or should sociology be a science? What are the arguments for and against the idea?

Sciences are based on guidelines in which it must meet in order for it to be a science. First of all it needs to have subject matter which will be studied. Then there must be a theory construction in which an explanation will uncovered. Furthermore, the hypothesis must be tested based on a prediction. Finally, a science uses empirical methods in which to collect the data. Many people would argue that Sociology doesn’t fit this criterion.

Positivists would say that society has an objective reality and that our behaviour is subject to external forces. This would suggest that we don’t make our own decisions as we are influenced and socialised throughout our life. Also Sociology relies on cause and effect in which scientists use to make predictions. This would suggest that Sociology is also a science as it is based on the same guidelines.

Join now!

Also, Karl Popper argued that the logic of science is deductive; scientists set up a hypothesis, test it against empirical data and then draw conclusions to the accuracy of the hypothesis (hypothetico-deductive model). He also says that the way in which Sociological experiments are illustrated in a way which is similar to how a science experiment is written in school. This shows that Sociology also has similar ‘headings’ to the way science is taught in schools. This suggests that Sociology is evidence based and involves subject matter in which gives valid and reliable results.

Realists would say that Sociology could ...

This is a preview of the whole essay