• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

Extracts from this document...


Michelle Deluce Tutor: Joanne Green CRIMINOLOGY Page 1 CRITICALLY COMPARE AND CONTRAST FUNCTIONALIST AND TRADITIONAL MARXIST PERSPECTIVES ON CRIME There are many theories on why crime exists as well has who is committing the crimes and the underlying reasons behind it The two main perspectives being Traditional Marxist and Functionalist both with different views they share very little in common, however they do agree that society shapes the individual and not the individual that shapes society. What is meant by that is that we are all products of our upbringings and learn through socialisation what our beliefs are, what we agree on personally and often shared beliefs and the understanding of what is 'the norm; through our primary interaction with others beginning at home and continuing onto schooling and work. Our beliefs aren't always set in stone and can change through time and growth and the interaction with others once outside the family domain. There are many explanations beginning with Durkheim who was a functionalist, there is Merton who doesn't totally agree with Durkheim but adopted his theory on 'Anomie' and made it his own. In addition there is Hirschi whose theories mirrored that of Durkheim's and before concluding, Marxist view on crime will be looked at. The Functionalist view on crime and society is likening it to the human body to explain it functions. ...read more.


He created his own model of explanation and the type of bonds we care within society that consisted of four elements; Attachment, deals with how we care for others or have an inability not to have concern, typically a psychopath. The second element commitment, based on personal input into our own lives, for example our work and home environment, material things we own and our children and their education in comparison to a single male living in a Michelle Deluce Tutor: Joanne Green CRIMINOLOGY Page 3 bed-sit on benefits whom is more likely to offend due to a sense of having little to lose. The third, Involvement, a business person involved in legitimised dealings is less likely to offend due to having little time to do so. Then there is belief, a person who abides by the rules and conforms to the norms and acceptable standards within society and perhaps is totally against rule breaking. Marxism has a different slant on why crime exists and the origins of law enforcement compared to the functionalist view. Marxism began with Karl Marx and others after him have shared his view and added their own. His idea in the class divide between the richest in society or the bourgeoisie and those on the lower rung of the societal ladder, the working class, has long been documented. ...read more.


Both concepts were interesting and provided thought and the pioneers of both set precedence and have long since been adapted by others. Hirschi seemed a little too vague in his explanations with very little backup in his theories and his model of four elements seemed flawed. How could he say that a law-abiding person isn't likely to offend and he offers no proof to support his suggestion? He also states that a businessperson would be too involved in business matters not to commit a crime, Marxist would totally disagree, and they would say that he is more likely to be deviant within a corporate structure although should it occur it is highly unlikely the public would be made aware of it. However the question of mental state of an individual hasn't even been raised by any of the sociologists to explain why a person may offend. Merton seemed to make a lot of sense but there seemed to be something missing in his explanations on why crime exists why some commit and others don't, perhaps the reality is there is no definite answer on why it exists. Michelle Deluce Tutor: Joanne Green CRIMINOLOGY Page 5 BIBLOGRAPHY Durkheim, E (1985/1987) Suicide: A Study in Sociology, London: Routledge Erikson, K J. (1966) Wayward Puritans, New York: Wiley Hirschi, T. (1969) Causes of delinquency, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Merton, R. (1938) Social Structure and Anomie, American Sociological Review, Vol 3, 672-683 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    However unlike Marxists left realists are reformist and not revolutionary socialists; they believe in the gradual social change rather than the violent overthrow of capitalism as the way to achieve greater equality. They believe we need to develop explanations of crime that will lead to practical strategies for reducing it

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    Furthermore, the idea of an area in constant "transition" contradicts Functionalist ideas, because the "norm" of "disorganization" cannot exist within a society based upon consensus. Marxists would criticize the very idea of blaming crime on the environment, instead pointing to other causes, such as desperation due to oppression and deprivation resulting in crime.

  1. Asses the Marxist Perspective on Crime

    create a 'false consciousness', an illusion of equality; they are in place to maintain the power of the ruling class and to keep the subject class under control. From a Marxist point of view, there is a systematic bias in favour of those at the top, and this is evident when looking at how laws are enforced.

  2. Outline & Evaluate the Marxist view of crime (45 Marks)

    ruling class to carry on making immoral profits and exploiting their workers. Some laws are set to only benefit the working class, such as the minimum wage. This has no effect on the rich community.

  1. Assess the view that crime is functional, inevitable and normal.

    years, noting that where societies have a lack of attachment, crime rates are higher. A common criticism of Durkheim is that his theory fails to explain who is more likely to commit crime and when. Robert K. Merton's Strain theory was an attempt to expand Durkheim's ideas.

  2. What explanations have been suggested for occupational crime? Is it different from conventional ...

    tax than he should, he then gives workers cash in hand from the tills to make up for the low wage he pays them (Mars, 1984:43). The businessman is more likely fiddling the government. His workers are gaining maximum benefits, which would in turn make them appreciate the job more.

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    (Haralambos, 2000, page 356) If the social structures become intolerant to any crime or deviance - society would become stagnant. Ironically, crime can therefore offer positive improvement within society. As a result of crime - the method of implementing and enforcing the law has evolved and improved.

  2. Deviance in Society A person would be considered to be acting deviantly in society ...

    From 1980 to 1986 reported cases did go up sixty percent. The most common reasons found that parents abuse their children are because this is a learned function they acquired from their parents. This tendency to pass down deviant behaviour through generations is a cycle of family violence (Lemert 48).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work