• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Deviance is normal" - In what sense is this true?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Deviance is normal". In what sense is this true? Deviance could be identified as a form of social classification which is a sociological concept concerning "things" which offend a cultures expectance and social norms. Thus deviance can change over time and differ from societies, what is not accepted in one decade or society can be in another. For example guy relationships where once perceived as a mental illness. It could now be argued that they have become social accepted and are no longer perceived as being deviant or a mental illness. This change of viewpoint could be due to time and the society's values changing. Downs and Rode defined deviance "As banned or controlled behavior which is likely to attract punishment or disapproval." Thus suggesting that all forms of "anti social" behavior are included, when considering deviance. Such acts such as murder which attracts punishment right through to mild acts such as burping and farting which attract mild disapproval. Therefore Downs and Rock could be suggesting that deviance is "normal" depending on the boundaries that the society enforces. Deviance can be either secret or private and occur within the home and can also be public and open. Deviance however is often concealed and feared off. ...read more.

Middle

Secondary deviance concerns acts which have been publicly labeled as deviant and can affect ones status in society. By society labeling more acts as deviant they could be in danger as creating further deviance as ever act could become deviant. Thus labeling people as deviant publicly marks them out so that the individual who was ones a friend, family member is now perceived as a criminal and has a stigma attached to them. They have been given a negative status and are not allowed to interact with society and may feel rejected thus seeks comfort in committing more deviant acts as they have accepted the label that has been given to them. This is referred to as "self fulfilling prophecy" where the individual carries out deviant acts as it gives them some form of "social status" and they feel it is what is expected of them. The labeling theory can be criticized as it does not consider who makes the rules and does not take into account how they become applied. Further more it does not take into consideration were the stereotypes originate form (Soc in focus pg 480) In addition there is no evidence suggesting that labeling an individual does have an effect on their behavior and cause them to be deviant or whether it is the interaction with other so called "criminals" which cause further deviant behavior. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example epilepsy has been in all three categories in history it has been perceived as a mental illness, a form of social deviance (badness) and as it is know today a physical illness. Ideas of what is social Normal can be worked out from these three categories. All the theories appear to empathies the importance that conformity plays in whether deviance occurs or not. It could be argued that a society should give leeway and accept that deviance is normal and likely to occur, due to as all being individuals with different thoughts and feelings and roles to play within society. For society to advanced according to Durkeims perspective then we need to take individuals needs into consideration and perhaps be more understanding. This can be seen in Holland who accept deviance as normally and have a lower crime rate, whereas in South Africa who implement strict rules and punishments on levels of freedom they "sow higher levels of violence" (Giddens pg 153). Thus suggesting that societies who accept deviance as normal need not suffer breakdown and moral confusion as long as equality is still a key factor. In addition as long as society's members are allowed to fulfill their wishes and are not restricted and the needs of the wider community are not forgotten then deviance need not be seen as a threat and be considered as Normal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    This is because women fear crime more than men and as a consequence adopt various avoidance behaviours, for example not going out alone at night. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF LIBERAL AND RADICAL FEMINISM Radical feminist ideas have gained empirical support.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    This theory is predominantly backed by the clear fact that areas termed as "inner city" do indeed have higher crime. However, this theory can be criticized for being too simple, and also because Shaw and McKay's idea of "concentric zones" do not fit in with any city- which have a mixture of different zones in different areas.

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    Marxism has also been criticised for its belief that capitalism is criminogenic as not all capitalist countries, such as Switzerland and Japan, have high crime rates. Neo-Marxists Taylor, Walton and Young criticise traditional Marxism as well as Interactionism. They believe that Interactionism is deterministic for saying that labels lead to

  2. Examine the role of access to opportunity structures in causing crime and deviance (12 ...

    vital part in causing crime and deviance, and the limited access to these structures can lead individuals within a society to turn to deviant and criminal behaviour as an alternative.

  1. Assess the view that crime is functional, inevitable and normal

    inaugurated, they turn to other options which can involve crime and deviance. This shows that, according to Merton, crime can fulfil a dysfunctional role within the society.

  2. Outline and evaluate Durkheims theory of suicide.

    Was a note left or the threat of suicide voiced? However, in only 30 % of suicides a note may have been discovered, many more may have been written and removed by family or friends because of what it contained.

  1. Analyse explanations of crime and deviance and explain the importance of social order and ...

    as a response to the extremes of wealth and poverty in capitalist society. However, left realists are critical of the Marxist idea for overlooking the ?reality? of crime in Britain by focusing on the problems within capitalism. Kinsey, Lea and Young (1986)

  2. Crime and deviance in Trinidad and Tobago

    According to the UN Office on the Drug and Crime Report of 2002, the causes of crime and deviance in the Caribbean are poverty and unemployment among others which relate to the lack of access to the legitimate opportunity structure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work