Social background e.g. ethnic group has also become a form of segregating from people in society that are likely to succeed and from people who will under achieve. One type of labelling is the notion that ‘Asian and Caucasians teenage boys do better in school than African Caribbean teenage boys’ even though this is a wide postulation and assumption sociologist may have used quantitative and qualitative methods, statistics and observations to endorse there theory. They may have used league tables to compare and contrast the results of different ethnic groups amongst the country. This can also be known as streaming
Streaming is a form of demarcation. Basically the idea is that those students that the school considers ‘capable’ or ‘skilled’ are place in a higher stream of class, e.g. Suzan may be at the top class in maths while Justin may be in a lower status class for maths. Fundamentally, Streaming categorises students into different class groups and are give a status depending on whether the school believe they are high achievers therefore receive a high status or if the teachers believe that they are low achievers therefore get a low status. Predictably students who are in high streams seem to usually come from either high or middle class family backgrounds. They usually end up being academically successful, steadfast in morals and values of the social institution they are from. They have a propensity to create a pro-school subculture. They usually portrayed as the perfect model of society, that if you work hard you could get to the top (in this case you could gain a higher status through academic success and be placed in a high streams of students and learning). This portrait disagrees with the functionalist views because streaming (one form of differential achievement) portrays that only people that have been put in high streams can be better achievers than those that have not been put in high streams. Lots of Functionalists suppose that every one’s academic achievement rests completely upon that person's IQ. They also believe that society operates in a meritocratic system e.g. society works and operates like a human body, each aspects depends on each other in hopes of surviving; and that people work for what they achieve. While Differential achievement backs up the theory and thoughts brought forward by Marxists, that people from less affluent backgrounds are academically disadvantaged from the beginning.
Differential achievement theory could also presume that someone who attends a private school in contrast a public city school, or some that receives extra tuition and attends a school that have a great resources and facilities has a greater prospect achieving well in future.
The sociologist Angela McRobbie acknowledged the subsistence of “Bedroom Culture”. This means girls often condemn of boisterous mentality amongst fellow girls. However on average in education girls are said to do better than boys. One factor to consider while distinguishing between both genders in cases of streaming, and education is that it is said that girls take greater pride in their work compared to boys.
Primarily in terms of differential achievement, various reasons why middle-class citizens seem to achieve more academically than working class citizens may be because:
- Enhanced living conditions
- Cultural capital e.g. more educational resources and extra tuition.
- Higher level of aspiration
- The ‘halo-effect from (middle-class) teachers
- peer pressure from other peers not to se the value of education
- Higher level of ambition
- A greater attentiveness of the reimbursement of deferred gratification
- Solid family background e.g. not from a broken family
Dissimilarities in levels of educational accomplishment in our civilization can be given in details in terms of three essential categories:
- Social background differences:
Cultural management
Socialisation
Family administration
Poverty
- Natural differences in intellect.
Hidden curriculum
Self-fulfilling prophecies
Teacher / peer group labelling
In conclusion differential achievement claims that because the society different class can verify the result of a child’s education success dynamics like cultural and material depravation can lead to underachievement. This means that the working class children can not become as skilled as working class students because the materials they need are unavailable as they can’t afford them.
Thank you for reading;
Grace Okpaloafe