• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do Subcultural theories offer convincing explanations for group offending by young men and women today? Are there any other theoretical perspectives which you may consider to be useful and relevant?

Extracts from this document...


Do Subcultural theories offer convincing explanations for group offending by young men and women today? Are there any other theoretical perspectives which you may consider to be useful and relevant? Subcultural theories examine the behaviour and actions of various groups within society - groups with either reject or depart from the traditional norms and views of the majority. These groups are referred to as subcultures, and subcultural theories attempt to explain why these groups - most are concerned with "youth gangs" and gang delinquency - engage in deviant acts. Subcultural theories originated in America and in particular the Univeristy of Chicago Sociology Department. Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay at the University studied juvenile crime rates in Chicago and they divided the city up into a series of concentric rings. They then calculated the delinquency rates of in each ring finding that areas with the highest crime rates were those in the centre of the city, with the rates diminishing outwards from the centre. They noted that delinquency was lower in areas of high economic status while it was seen to be high in areas of low economic status. Their studies also found that these findings remained constant over time, notwithstanding "successive changes in the nativity and nationality composition of the population"1. They therefore came to the conclusion that "delinquency-producing factors are inherent in the community"2 and are culturally transmitted. They said that what is transmitted is "social disorganisation" This term referred to an inconsistency of values, attitudes and standards of behaviour. ...read more.


from the fact that it provides a means of securing economic gain, prestige, and other human satisfactions and is embodied in delinquent groups and criminal organizations, many of which have great influence, power and prestige"13. Children are exposed to these values as they are transmitted and passed down from generation to generation as are the techniques for committing offences. In discussing this, Shaw and Mckay give examples of the types of offences whose techniques are passed down, such as jack-rolling and shoplifting - crimes which lack a purpose. They strongly emphasise the role of the peer group and they say that in the context of this group crime is regarded as normal, as from the viewpoint of the delinquent's immediate social world (the subculture) and the norms associated with that world, he is not necessarily "disorganised, maladjusted or antisocial" but may be highly organized and well-adjusted14. Cohen's explanation of juveniles turning to crime centred upon their frustration at being unable to achieve "middle class" success and, more specifically, success at school. He says that in the resulting delinquent subculture, delinquents respond as a group and that this response has been worked out by their group over many years. This response is to "invert" the norms of wider society with the result that the subcultures' activities are, as mentioned earlier, non-utilitarian, malicious and negativistic. Indeed, these descriptions of the groups' activities explain crimes such as shoplifting (which is non-utilitarian) and vandalism (which is malicious) rather well. Cohen himself says that much gang stealing has no motivation and is in fact stealing "for the hell of it" and is a "valued activity to which attaches glory, prowess and profound satisfaction"15 rather than as an activity for gain and profit. ...read more.


BIBLIOGRPAHY * Wolfgang, Leonard Savitz and Norman Johnson, (1970), The Sociology of Crime and Delinquency, New York: John Wiley and Sons * Rubington, E. and Weinberg, M. (1995) The Study of Social Problems, Oxford: Oxford University Press * Downes, D. (1966) The Delinquent Solution, London: Routledge. * Downes, D. and Rock, P. (1988) Understanding Deviance, London: Clarendon Press * Jones, S. (1988) Criminology, London: Butterworths * Williams, K (1997) Texbook on Criminology, London: Blackstone Press * Cohen, A.K. (1955) Delinquent Boys, New York: Free Press * Cloward, R. and Ohlin, L. (1960) Delinquency and Opportunity, New York: Free Press. * Matza, D. (1964) Delinquency and Drift, New York: Wiley * Sutherland, E. and Cressey, D. (1979) Criminology, 11 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1 Shaw, C. and McKay, H. "Social Disorganisation", in Radzinowicz and Wolfgang "Crime and Justice Vol 1, p.415 2 ibid. 3 ibid. p,411 4 Sutherland, E. and Cressey, D. "Learning to be Deviant", in Rubington and Weinburg, "The Study of Social Problems", p.143 5 ibid. p.144 6 Cohen, Albert "The Delinquent Subculture", in Wolfgang, Savitz and Johnson, "The Society of Crime and Delinquency", p.286 7 Downes & Rock, "Understanding Devience", p.150 8 Merton, R. "Social Structure and Anomie" American Sociological Review. 9 as described in Downes & Rock, p.151 10 Becker, H. "Outsiders", Free Press. 11 as discussed in Jones, Stephen, "Criminology" 1998, Butterworths, p.156 12 Shaw & McKay, p.413 13 ibid. p.411 14 ibid. p.416 15 Cohen, p.287 16 as discussed in Jones, p.167 17 Williams, Katherine, "Textbook on Criminology" 1997, Blackstone Press Ltd, p.364 LLB (Hons) Part Time Criminology Page 11 of 11 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    This suggests that the validity of interactionist feminist ideas have to be questioned. Interactionist feminist theories have been criticised on a theoretical level. Marxist feminists would argue that social class is ignored. They would point out that selective law enforcement is not only tied to gender but also social class.

  2. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    or who do not conform as deviant and relentlessly punishes and persecutes them. Merton also fails to explain why most people who face strain do not turn to crime or other deviance, as it is only a small percentage that actually do so.

  1. Durkheims study of suicide has been criticised on theoretical and methodological grounds. Outline Durkheims ...

    Douglas stated that there is no single act that can be termed suicide since the meanings individuals place on their acts are so different. Douglas concludes that suicide needs much greater explanation as to its meaning than Durkheim provided. Durkheim's main argument was that there were in fact four different types of suicide; Egoistic, Anomic, Altruistic and Fatalistic.

  2. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    The young men have role models within the society, from whom they can learn the tricks of the trade. From this they can climb the social ladder within that society by committing crime and developing into criminal hierarchy; this brings them success and gives them monetary gain.

  1. Caderousse principal crime was to be an accomplice to Fernand and Danglars.

    As soon as the chamber knows about this a commission of twelve members is appointed to investigate the case. Thanks to Haydees Ali Pashas daughter it is proven that the Count of Morcerf is Fernand Mondego and is declared guilty of felony, treason and dishonor.

  2. Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

    Taylor, Walton and Young (1973) argue that labelling theory is wrong in suggesting that deviance is created by the social groups who define acts as deviant. Some acts - such as premeditated killing for personal gain - will always be regarded as deviant in our society.

  1. The purpose of this report is to evaluate and reflect upon my experience of ...

    peer A and myself scored high in is, indecision at moments of crisis and failure to provide clear leadership. Perhaps this theory would have applied to peer A and myself if we had all been working together on this project and didn?t need to take a lead role in it.

  2. What is a gang?

    Moreover, some people may have been very assertive gangs. Some people feel that many gangs are very frustrating and also stereotyped. Stereotyped because a widely held but fixed and over simplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing ?sexual or racial stereotypes. My personal feeling against particularly gangs is probably really different from them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work