• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


´╗┐EXAMINE THE REASONS WHY POSITIVISTS PREFER QUANTITATIVE DATA WHILE INTERPRETIVISTS PREFER QUALITATIVE DATA. ( 20 marks) 10 marks A01 10 marks A02 Can begin by briefly defining quantitative and qualitative data and giving one or two examples of methods that produce each type of data. Explain the connections between quantitative data and the positivists? scientific approach, using issues such as correlation, hypothesis testing, generalisations and cause and effect statements or scientific laws. Relate these to the key concepts of reliability and representativeness, explaining why methods that produce quantitative data may also produce reliable and representative data. Likewise, explain the links between qualitative data and interpretivism?s goal of understanding actors? subjective meanings, and link this to the key interpretivist concept of validity. ...read more.


Positivists favour a scientific approach emphasising the need for reliability and therefore they use structured research methods that can be repeated, such as experiments, questionnaires and structured interviews. Positivists regard participant observation and unstructured interviews as unreliable because they cannot be repeated and do not use a standardised system of measurement. A hypothesis is an idea which the researcher guesses might be true, but which has not yet been tested against the evidence so it is a prediction of what the researcher thinks will happen e.g. Hypothesis: Pigs get fat because they eat too much food. Correlation: If changes in one thing are matched by changes in another thing then there is said to be a correlation or relationship between the two things. ...read more.


For example, -----In practice a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods are used, a process known as triangulation, which results in both statistical and written data being used. This results in the strengths of one type balancing the weakness of the other. However, funding bodies, for example the Government, often prefer, quantitative data which is easy to analyse and to confirm or put forward the policies of the day. The nature of the topic also can influence whether the data used is quantitative or qualitative. NOTE: This is probably one of the hardest questions you will have to answer on research methods. If you can master this essay this will really help you in your basic understanding of research methods. GOOD LUCK! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    secondary sources of data

    4 star(s)

    Where emotions are concerned e.g. in the case of guilt people may be more concerned with justifying their actions rather than giving an exact account of a situation. Also, they may not be true particularly when people fantasize rather than record actual experiences.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the weakness of different types of documents used in a sociological research. Examine ...

    4 star(s)

    Most personal documents can be cheap, saving the researcher time and money. Public documents are items such as reports from government, business, the media, and voluntary organisations. When the author's document becomes publicly available, the content is particular bias. For example, media reports may reflect political views of media.

  1. Discuss the usefulness of Quantative and Qualitative Methods in study of Suicide.

    As his methods looked in-depth at the situation around suicide he was able to take much more of in-depth view of suicide on the whole, and consciously make subjective decisions he knew coroners were making. This means that the qualitative method were more useful for looking into how suicide statistics are formed.

  2. Qualitative and Quantitative methods of gathering data an overview.

    Philipson who come from the qualitative(interpretive) veiw claims that structured methods are low in validity he claims that the instruments of the observer creates the very order they are designed to reveal i.e the questions are thought out in advance(which is rational)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work