• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Sociological Explanations of the Relationship between Religion & Social Change

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate Sociological Explanations of the Relationship between Religion & Social Change The relationship between religion and social change has forever wielded many sociological explanations attempting to comment on this ambiguous issue. While some favour the view religion does indeed promote social change (Weber), others argue religion inhibits social change (Durkheim). Firstly it's important to understand what is meant by the concept social change. From a sociologists view point, social change in terms of religion can be used to change the politics, economics, or values of a society. This can be illustrated from a contemporary standpoint by reflecting on the Buddhist monks in Burma. These monks are using their religious and spiritual beliefs to change the society they live in. Speaking from a more historical context however, we can see that the religions of Ghandi, Martin Luther King and Mother Teresa, have been used and some may argue exploited; to change wider society. ...read more.


Of course there are certain examples of this which support Marxist theory, the fact religion prevented a revolution in the 20th century was 'keeping the working classes in check' and this further supports their view religion is a conservative force which favours the ruling classes and inhibits social change. However, critically speaking Marxist theory like Functionalists theory doesn't take into account mass examples where religion has been used to promote social change, Liberation theology, French and Russian revolutions in the 20th century, The Taliban in the middle East - all ways in how religion has cased social change and all ways Marxist theory on religion can be disproved. Max Weber (The Protestant Ethic & the Spirit of Capitalism 1958) was sympathetic to the fact religion can be used as a conservative force but noted how it could be used radically as a vehicle for social change. Calvinists were a seventieth century protestant sect that believed in pre destination, this was only the elect was to reach heaven. ...read more.


a way they can justify, this can therefore lead to sociologists questioning the nature of the social change, and whether it can be tightly tied to religion may be hard to measure. Finally post modernists see religion as an indicator in social change arguing the change in religion reflects the shift from modernity to post modernity. Post modernists see society in constant change where there are no absolute truths, the decline in rationalism and growth of religious pluralism undermine the traditional community dimension of religion. They see the very rise of post modernity the resurgence of religion and the many ways some religions can be conservative or radial based on culture or location. The relationship between religion and social change has forever been of great sociological debate but with the emergence of post modernism and the many new religions forming it compels us to contemplate new definitions of religion, most of which contribute a radical or conservative force in society either inhibiting or promoting social change ?? ?? ?? ?? Jason Kane ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The writer definitely answers the specific question asked, as they explain how religion can be viewed as both a conservative force and as a radical force for social change. By referring to both arguments, lots of evaluative points can be ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The writer definitely answers the specific question asked, as they explain how religion can be viewed as both a conservative force and as a radical force for social change. By referring to both arguments, lots of evaluative points can be awarded, which is actually what the majority of marks in sociology are given for. Most candidates tend to forget that they need to continually evaluate; instead lots of people only write about sociological theories in a list fashion, which examiners hate. This essay is well structured, with an apt introduction and conclusion, which will get them a decent grade.

Level of analysis

This candidate clearly has a good all round academic knowledge, but occasionally they make a few mistakes that although seem minor, are actually vital to get right in order to gain more marks. An example that jumps out at me is: “Calvinists were a seventieth century protestant sect”, as it was a seventeenth century sect. I would also argue that the candidate needs to specifically explain liberation theology further – as it massively contributed to social change – because the point is vague, “Liberation theology was a fuse of Christianity and Marxism and was used to radically change society”. How was it used to radically change society? They should mention that priests educated peasants in order to help them get out of rural poverty in Latin America in the 1960s.
The candidate makes good use of contemporary issues/examples in relation to how religion has been a radical force for change, such as “Another example of fundamentalism promoting social change would be that of mainly Islamic groups. The September 11th attacks can be explained in terms of social and economic change”. This is in addition to historical social change, for instance Weber’s theory that Calvinism was a major influence in the creation of a new society, capitalism.
Sociological key terms, “Liberation theology” and “religious pluralism” are mentioned, which is very good, because, in my experience, most candidates have a tendency to not bother with the terms that sound complicated. But the writer will be credited for weaving these so well into their essay.

Quality of writing

There are a fair few grammatical issues in this essay. There are random capital letters in the middle of sentences, “Industrialisation” and the wrong word is sometimes used, “off course” instead of “of course”. It also mentions “terrorist’s attacks” when it should simply be “terrorist attacks”. On the whole though spelling is good, although I did notice the writer abbreviated “September” to “Sept” which I think gives a bit of an informal (and perhaps lazy) impression. If this issues were corrected I think a slightly higher mark would be reflected.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by cwhite 23/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and asses sociological explanations for workplace inequalities between men and women

    5 star(s)

    Pringle summarised that through intimidation and ideological power men are able to enforce the gender roles and sustain inequality within the workplace. However Pringle was criticised for paying little attention to the operation of the gender market as a whole.

  2. The education system is meritocratic

    their parents did and this means that a meritocracy where people can move up and down the social ladder must exist as if it did not then their would be no working class kids in universities.

  1. Can and should sociology be a science?

    All research is inevitably subjective (value laden). For example the topic that is chosen for research, questions asked in interviews and the way that data is analyzed is based on the sociologist's values. Max Weber argued that sociology should remain as value-free as possible because human values can distort sound scientific investigation.

  2. Outline and evaluate Functionalism view of education

    Not everyone is equally talented so it is necessary and this encourages healthy competition between people in society today and its members can select the most talented individuals to fill these high paid jobs. Education is seen as playing a key part in this process and it gives individuals the chance to show their ability.

  1. Evaluate sociological explanations of the relationship between gender and religious belief and practice.

    Marxism sees religion as a feature only of a class-divided society. In terms of religion as an ideology, Marx sees it as a belief system that distorts people's perception of reality in ways that serve the interests of the ruling class.

  2. Outline and Assess Whether stratification is either inevitable or beneficial to individuals and society?

    he predicting a lot change in society with the rise of the workers and the fall of capitalism, however these things have failed to happen, and in fact it is communist regimes who have changed to capitalism. Marx has been accused of being to economic determinist by some sociologists.

  1. Nature vs. Nurture Feral Children

    Sociologists tend to agree that a baby?s mind at birth is like a blank page and all future experiences will affect how baby learns how to behave. Therefore environment has a direct effect on an individual?s behaviour. Feral children Throughout history there have been several very rare instances where children

  2. Feral children

    feral children often find it extremely difficult to master these skills. In other cases the child has not been taken in and raised by animals therefore is left alone with very little or no social interaction whether it be from animal or man .For example Genie was kept in a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work