• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify & Discuss The Factors Which Will Influence A Researchers Choice Of Methods

Extracts from this document...


Identify & Discuss The Factors Which Will Influence A Researchers Choice Of Methods When researchers decide to carry out investigations and studies, they must first decide how they are going obtain the accurate data, which they need to support their initial hypothesis and aim. Once the researcher has selected the topic, which they want to investigate, they need to choose the correct methods to collect their data. The choice of the methods they use depends on a number of factors. For example, there are practical considerations, in some cases participant observation or researcher participation may be a better way of investigating behaviour in gangs, than asking the members to fill out questionnaires and participate in interviews. On the other hand, interviews, questionnaires may be better used in other research topic circumstances, in which they provide important statistical data, from which general conclusions can be generalised from. Halfpenny (1984)1, suggests that there are, 'Two main research traditions or approaches to research with sociology". Firstly, there are Positivist researchers. These researchers, when deciding methods to use in their research use hard quantitative data, such as questionnaires and surveys, mainly using first hand primary data. They gather numerical data, for example questionnaires, which have several advantages. ...read more.


Positivist sociologists would then ask why this is and try to identify a small number of factors, which would explain this, gaining their conclusions from the hard evidence. An example of positivist research comes from Albert Cohen (1998)5. He suggested that Crime was a solution to the problem of status frustration. Young men were frustrated in trying to gain status in legal ways and therefore by becoming delinquents and engaging in unsocial activities, they achieved a certain kind of higher status within their peers. By doing this, he could see cause and effect and determine casual relations. However there are many disadvantages to using scientific methods, mainly concerning ethics and the fact that if the evidence is gained from, say a laboratory experiment, then how far can you generalise it to outside life and everyday social interactions? Another sociological approach comes from sociologists known as Interprevists. These researchers prefer to understand human behaviour by seeing the world through the eyes of those being studied. They believed that people give meaning to their own behaviour and to the behaviour of others. Therefore to understand their behaviour, you have to discover and interpret the meanings, which give their actions. ...read more.


For example road accidents are rarely seen as suicides, while drownings, hangings and drug overdoses are more likely to be put down as suicides. Therefore, this shows that you cannot generalise completely. There may be circumstances. By using official data, like Positivists do, you just generalise to one situation, you are not allowing any other conclusions to come from it, there may be exceptions, such as a road accident could have been intended rather than just an accident. The interpretivist views allow us to see all aspects of a circumstance and generalise all to conclusions, instead of having one preset idea. By having a preset idea, the world does not work in that way, society has exceptions, so you should not collectively generalise situations. Societies are all different, so are individuals, so they should allow their owning meanings of situations to be put across. It is said that, 'qualitative research has traditionally been used predominantly in the Social sciences such as in Sociology' Denzin & Lincoln (1994).9 In conclusion, there are many different viewpoints on how researchers should choose their methods when studying a topic. While both sides have their pro's and cons, either way can be used. Some circumstances call for one type of view to be used, for example Positivists, while another may need an Interpretivist viewpoint. Maybe a combination of the both can allow better results (triangulation). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Examine the ways in which practical, ethical and theoretical factors may influence a sociologists ...

    They favour qualitative data e.g. through informal interviews, observation and personal documents as it produces valid, in-depth and insightful which is also not predefined and can allow the researcher to establish verstehen.

  2. Discuss the usefulness of Quantative and Qualitative Methods in study of Suicide.

    Case studies can not be generalised to a country and they certainly can not be generalised to several. This is where qualitative methods fail, and statistics are highly useful.


    Although Cobb (1993) reported a 75% success rate, the Mental Health Charity MIND (2002) believes that there should be a "rigorous review to determine whether any continued use if justified." Psychosurgery is seen very much as a treatment of last resort.

  2. Assess the usefulness of Postal Questionnaires

    findings, which is generally time consuming and more costly when compared to postal questionnaires. Whilst postal questionnaires produce mostly reliable data interviews are more prone to getting valid data, as long as the interviewer is able to keep their own views to themselves and create a comfortable environment for the

  1. Examine some of the factors that influence a researchers choice of method (20 Marks)

    a controversial issue at the time and the subjects he was using were committing a criminal act. The second topic which must be considered when writing are the ethical factors behind a research method. The research methods must be kept as ethical as possible.

  2. Assess the view that sociology can and should not model itself on the natural ...

    The main reason why we should reject verificationism is because of the ?fallacy of induction?. Induction is the process of moving from the observation of particular instances of something to arrive at a general statement. Popper uses swans to demonstrate this.

  1. Experimental methods are of little use to sociologists. Discuss

    they often use sampling methods such as stratified random they feel that there research is representative of the wider society and that you can generalise from it in the same way that scientists would generalise from their experiments. However, Sociologists do use some psychology experiments to back up the sociologist?s research such as the ?bobo doll? study.

  2. Assess the factors that influence a sociologists choice of research method.

    women over 50. Sampling can save time and money, because the larger population cannot be studied. There are different methods of producing a sample. Random sampling is the simplest. Everyone in the population has an equal chance of being in that sample, and it gets rid of bias sampling.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work