• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and Assess the Usefulness of Conflict Theories in Explaining Social Class Inequalities in the Contemporary UK

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and Assess the Usefulness of Conflict Theories in Explaining Social Class Inequalities in the Contemporary UK Class inequality is the concept that the class positions of people within society are not just. A conflict theory of class inequality is a theory which states that this is the result of the dominant group controlling and exploiting others within society. A commonly known conflict theory of class inequality is Marxism. This theory argues that society is divided into two classes; the ruling class and the working class. The ruling class exploits the working class but the working class fails to revolt. Another conflict theory is Weberian theory that disagrees with Marxist Theory. Weberian theory argues that inequality is not solely due to economics as Marxist theory does. Weberian theory states that inequality is the result of class, status and party. One conflict theory of society is Marxism. Marxist theory states that there are two classes within society, the Bourgeoisie (ruling class) and the Proletariat (working class). Marxism suggests that society is a Capitalist system and that all inequality stems from economic inequality. The Bourgeoisie owns the means of production, and as a result of this they exploit their Proletariat workers. Althusser (1971) argues that the Proletariat does not question their situation as institutions (ideological state apparatuses) such as the media transmit the ruling class ideology that implies that society is meritocratic and that those who work hard will succeed when this is not the case. The ideology makes class positions appear just and fair. ...read more.

Middle

As stated previously, the working class may not have a false class consciousness, this is shown by the research by Marshall et al. Neo-Marxism states that the superstructure transmits the ruling class ideology which shapes the workers and workers of the future. As shown by Willis, pupils do not necessarily work and become the workers desired by the Capitalist system. This shows that as Neo-Marxism does not overcome many of the weaknesses of Traditional Marxism it is not useful in explaining social class inequalities in contemporary UK. Weberian Theory is another conflict theory. Weberian Theory differs from Marxist Theory as it does not hold economic factors solely into account. Weberian theory outlines three influences on inequality. One of these was class and Weber outlined four social classes, the propertied upper class, the propertyless white-collar workers, the petty bourgeoisie and the manual working class. Another influence on inequality was status, ones social standing. Status can be obtained from occupation, religion, gender, race as well as consumption. Weber's theory of inequality is placed great emphasis on the concept of "status groups", people united by similar statuses. Status groups can used to divide classes. This was outlined in the research by Margaret Stacey in the 1950s. Her research into the people of Banbury, Oxfordshire found that the manual working class were divided into three different status groups; the respectable working, class, the ordinary working class and the rough working class. The third influence on inequality suggested by Weberian Theory is party. This can be described as the amount of political power someone has which can be obtained from membership to trade unions, freemasons, old boy networks and political parties. ...read more.

Conclusion

Due to factors such as material deprivation, cultural deprivations and lack of opportunity to go to private schools working class pupils are less likely to achieve than the higher classes. As a result of this, role allocation may simply reproduce the existing class inequalities. As a result of this, Conflict theories are a better way of explaining class inequality than Consensus Theories. To conclude, Conflict theories are useful in explaining why there it class inequality to an extent. Marxist Theory is relevant to contemporary UK largely in education; pupils are brainwashed by the ruling class ideology so they become submissive workers and fail to see their exploitation. However, this is disputed by sociologists such as Marshall et al who argue that people are aware of the inequality in society and Willis, who states that the education system does not necessarily create to workers desired by the Capitalist system. Marxist theory can also be seen as reductionist and is therefore not a valid explanation of social class inequality in contemporary UK. Weberian Theory can be seen as a more valid explanation of social class inequality within the UK as it looks at the bigger picture. Weberian Theory takes into account factors such as status and party that may lead to inequality. However, Weberian theory may exaggerate the importance of class within society. Both Marxism and Weberian theory do not provide a solution to the problems outlined by the theories. Although Conflict theories are limited in their explanations of class inequality in contemporary UK they provide more useful explanations than consensus theories such as Functionalism. Functionalism places great emphasis on society being meritocratic. This may not be the case which directly disputes the theory. Sapphire Mason-Brown ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and assess Functionalist explanations of the role of the education system.

    4 star(s)

    Working together with the principle of meritocracy, functionalists see the education system as an institution which provides the members of society with the benefit of working hard to achieve in life. Davis and Moore see the existence of a hierarchical qualification system as positive, - providing employers with the ability

  2. The education system is meritocratic

    Bernstein spoke about two different kinds of speech codes these are elaborated which are very descriptive this is a middle class way of speaking and what is needed in school and restricting which is colloquial and consists of slang words which create a view of a person not being as bright.

  1. Outline and Assess Whether stratification is either inevitable or beneficial to individuals and society?

    Weber like Marx treated social class as an economic matter. He agreed that ownership of productive property an non ownership is an important basis for class formation but Weber moved away from this 2 class model. He chose to define class in terms of position in the market place.

  2. Discuss the similarities and differences between conflict of Marxist theories and functionalist theories in ...

    state capitalist regimes that used to dominate Russia and eastern Europe and still hold sway in China, North Korea, Vietnam and Cuba. Marxism, which is also known as the conflict theory, was first attributed to Karl Marx and is based on the idea that society is in constant struggle because

  1. This essay will evaluate three groups within society; the Feminists, Postmodernists and the Marxists, ...

    control, especially with the sick role conditionally legitimising the deviance termed illness. Although biology influences health, it does not determine it, health inequalities between the sexes are the result of the interaction of biology and society. It determines how society can structure and influence our lives (Matthews, 2015).

  2. What are the functionalist, conflict and symbolic interactionist theory of stratification?

    Our example is an imagined Kurdish male teenager in Syria called Aram. Since he is from the oppressed Kurdish minority by the Arabic majority, he will develop a kind of Kurdish oppressed identity since the elementary school when he realise that his language is forbidden.

  1. Should we assume that stratification is natural and therefore inevitable? Is class merely about ...

    in the education of girl child because they are likely to get married and leave home and they cannot bring back the economic returns to the household that the boys will. In India many villages are still lacking the basic facilities of toilets because of which parents do not want to send their girl child to school.

  2. Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society

    E.g. red roses represent a romantic gesture. Secondly, meanings are the product of social interaction. Like giving a red rose to your grandma is not a romantic gesture. And those meanings are handled through a reflective process where people try to make sense of situations. E.g. should I really giver her some flowers?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work