• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Paul Krugman in Confronting Inequality tries to explain how bad inequality is

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Stafford April Stafford Sandra Valerio English 1301.501 16 June 2012 Confronting Inequality Response Paul Krugman in ?Confronting Inequality? tries to explain how bad inequality is and the things that can bring inequality up or down. He gives reasons of why he and Americans should care about the rising inequality. Krugman says, ?One reason to care about inequality is the straight forward matter of living standards. The lack of clear economic progress for lower and middle income families is in itself an important reason to seek a more equal distribution of income? (322). Krugman also uses many quotes from people who have had a big impact on America to help argue his point about inequality. Quote that stuck out on its own was the one Thomas Jefferson said, ?The small landowners are the most precious part of a state? (323). ...read more.


Even though most families move around trying to send their kids to good schools so they can get a better education in hopes they will continue on to college. This just says that no matter how good or bad your parents are doesn?t always determine on how the child will be in their futures. Krugman does argue a great point that inequality is nearly sky rocketing in today?s society and it?s not good. Feeling that inequality should decrease more than increase to make America what people call the free country. Its sad going around hearing and seeing all the unequal people lining up for help just to get turned down. No one would want to ever have to go through life knowing they are seriously unequal to everyone else. On another note having to disagree with eliminating inequality completely would tear this country apart with nothing but anger and war toward each other. ...read more.


Like when he talks about the hedge fund loopholes and mentions Americans lose $6 billion annually through the oversight. Krugman then correlates that with the ability to provide healthcare to 3 million children. This is only on loop hole out of many others, just imagine how much money could be squeezed out of the rich. I can honestly say they can?t squeeze anymore out of the middle class. Krugman doesn?t really consider people taking action into their own hands. He is what I like to call a theorists that thinks maybe if we get the right legislation and get the ball rolling politically we can solve these problems. My generation especially, realizes this will never work and elected officials are not going to change anything. I believe things are very unbalanced and some people are doing a very good job of keeping it that way. When the government loses control of leveling the playing field, just like in the past, the people are going to have to step up. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Identify current patterns of ill health and inequality in the UK. Explain probable ...

    " Health inequality runs throughout life, from before birth into old age. It exists between social classes, different areas of the country, between men and women, and between people with different ethnic backgrounds. But the story of health inequality is clear: the poorer you are, the more likely you are to be ill and to die younger.

  2. Education and Social Inequality

    They have to give impartial advice, so that they are not promoting things that seek to promote things that do not have the pupil's best interest at heart. There has also been some debate over the school leaving age increase to 17 by 2013 and 18 by 2018.

  1. Sociological theories and Healthcare.

    We can't rely on Functionalism or Marxism these days. Functionalists believe society needs social institutions to be corrected before it can run smoothly. One of these social institutions is family (the typical family). Functionalists believe that with out family an individual would turn out different which could cause the society to become chaotic.


    The crutch therefore will have to remain until there is an equitable distribution of wealth. I would not like to see the crutch taken off when Malay contractors can only get contracts from the Government. Where are they to go?

  1. Our Hands

    Women have struggled to earn independence and respect, and have succeeded. Women since the seventies now have a choice to terminate their pregnancy if they feel that a child will interfere with their lifestyle of simply, if they so choose.

  2. Learning Disabilities and Misunderstanding. In Bayntons Disability and the Justification of Inequality of ...

    Rochelle Kenyon is head of a project named Florida?s Bridges to practice, this is a program that focuses on identifying learning disabilities in early education and offering help for these students. Diagnosing a learning disability is very hard. Kenyon outlines many symptoms for various disabilities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work