Should we assume that stratification is natural and therefore inevitable? Is class merely about being rich and poor? How does class intersect with other categories of social exclusion and thus reinforce inequality?
Jaivardhan Singh Shekhawat
Should we assume that stratification is ‘natural’ and therefore inevitable? Is class merely about being rich and poor? How does class intersect with other categories of social exclusion and thus reinforce inequality?
Social stratification is totally about the division of society into layers. It also talks about unequal positions of individual in the society. In all societies, members are arranged in the terms of superiority, inferiority and equality. Those in the top strata have more power, privilege and prestige than those who are in the lower strata. Members of a group compare different individuals, as when selecting a mate, or employing a worker, or dealing with a neighbour, or developing friendship with an individual. They also compare group such as castes, races, colleges, cities, athletics teams. These comparison are valuations, and when a member of a group agrees, these judgements are social evaluations. Inequality among individuals is the idea of having stratification in the society. Gisbert said that “Social stratification is the division of society into permanent group of categories linked with each other by the relationship of superiority and subordination”. When we talk about Social stratification is universal. It is differentiated by age, sex, and personal characteristics also. The role played by adults is somehow different from that of children; and those who have rank and file differs from hunters or warriors.
Stratification is natural and therefore, inevitable because stratification is the law of nature, men are equal only if it is concerned to body structure, but their physical appearance, political, religious, mental, moral and economic classes are different. “Social inequality in unconsciously evolved device by which societies ensures that the most important positions are conscientiously filled by the most qualified person”. Four types of social stratification caste, class and estates. Social stratification always remains natural because these four types of stratifications is followed. First three types of stratifications depends on religious and legally sanctioned inequalities and class divisions are not officially recognised, but stem from economic factors affecting the material circumstances of people’s lives. In addition to this gender inequality is commonly evading in society. It refers to the uneven distribution of observations based on their gender. Gender has always negative consequences for women. Inequalities regarding gender are more deep rooted than any other class system. It is considered that women does not exist because they don’t have their equal say in the society as a result there is almost no society in the world which we can say that it has women right in every aspect of social life. Men are more influential in wealth and social life as compared to women. The stratification system decide largely the position that a man occupies in society. When we talk about India there are a lot of differences between girls and boys in poor families because they think why to invest in the education of girl child because they are likely to get married and leave home and they cannot bring back the economic returns to the household that the boys will. In India many villages are still lacking the basic facilities of toilets because of which parents do not want to send their girl child to school. Parents are also feared about violence towards girls in public places.