I will need to operationalise the concept criminality, in this study I will focus on street crime, and a particular list of offences that are more commonly associated with young people, these are: vandalism, street robbery, car theft, physical assault, illegal drug use, drug dealing and shoplifting.
I also need to operationalise the concept of appearance. In my study this involves gender, ethnicity and clothing style. I will use images of African/African Caribbean and white males and females, dressed in two styles of clothing. The first style of clothing will include hooded sweatshirts, baseball caps, branded sportswear such as tracksuits and ostentatious gold jewellery; this will be referred to as “street wear” throughout the study. The second style of clothing will consist of formal wear, tuxedos/suits for the males and evening dresses for the females.
It is important to consider any possible ethical issues when conducting my study. I will explain to participants that they will remain anonymous and that the answers they give to the questionnaire will remain confidential. Also, the identities of the individuals in the images used as examples of appearance will not be disclosed.
(803 Words)
Research Section
The aim of this research was to pilot a study into how young people’s perceptions of the potential criminality of other young individuals are affected by the appearance of the latter. The aspects of appearance focused on were gender, ethnicity and clothing style. Participants were shown images of individuals of both genders, from two different ethnic groups, dressed in two different clothing styles and asked to rate how likely they thought it was that the people in the pictures had committed various crimes.
The options were “very likely”, “quite likely”, “unsure”, “quite unlikely”, and “very unlikely”. To assess the results I awarded each of these categories a point score, from 5 for very likely, down to 1 for very unlikely. The graph below shows the mean scores for each crime given to images of females by participants, in comparison to those given to images of males.
As the graph shows, the participants in my study generally perceived the males as being more likely to have committed most of the crimes, shoplifting being the only exception, with the females being considered marginally more likely on average to commit this crime. Drug use is the one other crime where males and females received quite similar average scores, both slightly under 4 (quite likely). Males were considered on average quite significantly more likely to have committed all of the other crimes listed, especially mugging, with the average female score being just under 2 (quite unlikely), and the average male scoring being between 3 (unsure) and 4 (quite likely). These results suggest that young people may perceive their peers as more or less criminal depending on their gender, with males being seen as more criminal. They also suggest that some crimes are considered more gender specific than others, for example drug dealing in comparison to drug use.
The above graph shows the average scores given for each crime by participants to images of individuals dressed in “street wear” in comparison to those dressed in formal clothing. The results seem to suggest that clothing style makes a significant difference to how potentially criminal young individuals are perceived as being by their peers. Participants rated individuals wearing hooded sweatshirts, baseball caps, branded sportswear such as tracksuits and ostentatious gold jewellery on average as more likely to commit every one of the crimes listed. The two groups scored most similarly for the crimes of arson and drug use, suggesting that clothing style is considered less important to the young people in my sample when they are considering how likely their peers are to have committed these crimes. The style of clothing worn seems to have been more important to participants when they were deciding how likely they believed the individuals in the pictures were to have committed assault and vandalism, or to have mugged someone.
The graph below compares how likely participants rated white individuals on average to have committed various crimes in comparison to individuals of African/African Caribbean decent.
The results suggest that this factor had the least influence of the three on participants when they were assessing the potential criminality of individuals based on photographs. There doesn’t seem to be any clear difference in the perceived criminality of the two groups. White individuals were rated on average as being slightly more likely to shoplift, vandalise, mug (street robbery), and use drugs, black individuals were rating as being slightly more likely to commit assault and arson, and to sell drugs. However these differences are small.
Past studies have found different results, often with individuals of African or African Caribbean decent being perceived as more criminal in comparison to white individuals. One study, conducted at Penn State University in America, found that when readers were asked to identify criminal suspects pictured in stories about violent crimes, they were more prone to misidentify African American than White suspects. The researcher noted: “Essentially, people's `mismemories' of violent crime news seem to implicate all Black men rather than the specific individuals who are actually pictured." [3] Official UK statistics also suggest that the ethnicity of individuals affects whether they are perceived as being criminal by the police. [1]
Participants were asked to answer two open questions: “What things about the appearance of individuals do you believe affect how likely they appear, in the opinions of others, to be involved in criminal activity” and “Why do you think these things affect people’s opinions?”
Eleven out of the twelve participants stated that they believed clothing was a factor affecting how criminal young individuals appear, with two referring specifically to “hoodies” and baseball caps as making people appear more criminal, and one referring to “chav” clothing as an indicator of criminality. Two participants suggested that the facial expression of individuals can make them look more or less criminal; this could be a confounding variable in my study as the photographs I used did not feature individuals with identical facial expressions. Two participants suggested that ethnicity affects how criminal individuals appear to be.
Five participants stated that they thought that the media is a reason for peoples preconceptions about the criminality of other based on their appearance, “TV” and “reporting of crime” were referred to specifically. Two participants said they thought people were influenced by stereotypes. Two participants gave practical reasons for prejudices based on clothing style, suggesting that certain items of clothing could be used to hide to facial features, or could indicate gang membership. Three participants were rather vague, stating that people who look a certain way may be intimidating, but not suggesting any reasons for this.
The main finding of my study is that young people do seem to form ideas about the criminality of their peers based on their appearance. Participants only chose to tick the “unsure” box when asked to rate how likely individuals in photographs were to have committed various crimes a small percentage of the time. More frequently they expressed an opinion that the individual was likely or unlikely to have committed the crimes. There appears to be evidence that schemas about gender and styles have an effect, and although the data gathered in this study does not show clear evidence of individuals being perceived as more or less criminal because of their ethnic background, two participants stated that they believed ethnicity was a factor.
(1048 words)
Evaluation
This pilot study has produced some interesting data, but it is important that the conclusions drawn from a study using such a small sample should not be generalised to a larger population of which the sample is not representative. I feel the sample I used was representative of gender, and as representative of ethnicity as was possible in a study using such a small sample. One third of participants were from ethnic minorities, which is a larger percentage than in the UK population as a whole. However, if I had had used less individuals from ethnic minorities, I do not feel that different groups would have been adequately represented. In a larger study, a sample that is properly representative of the ethnic mix of the UK could be used. I do not believe that my sample was socio-economically representative, as all participants were drawn from individuals attending the 6th form of one school, and are likely to be from similar socio-economic backgrounds because of this. For the same reason I do not think my sample could be considered geographically representative, young individuals living in the countryside for example, might have had different experiences to the suburban teens in my study, and consequently could have different schemas about physical appearance and criminality. The sample for a larger study would need to be drawn from individuals from a variety of different socio-economic backgrounds, and geographical locations.
I think my research question “How are young people’s perceptions of the criminality of other young individuals affected by the appearance of the latter?” was quite clear in its aims, once the concepts of criminality and appearance were operationalised. In a larger scale study I would probably include questions on a larger variety of crimes to provide a more complete picture.
I believe that the use of questionnaires was appropriate in this study, as not only would interviews be far more time consuming, they may also result in the collection of less valid data. The interviewer could have unconsciously biased the results by asking questions in different tones of voice for example, or participants might have felt it necessary to give the answer they thought the interviewer wanted. I feel that a possible problem with my study is that participants could guess the aim, and this could affect results in two possible ways. Either participants could have tried to give the answers they thought I was looking for, or they may have purposely tried not to appear prejudiced. I suspect this could possibly one of the reasons why my results show no significant differences in the perceived criminality of the two ethnic groups, despite other studies finding that African/African-Caribbean individuals are perceived as more criminal by the general public than whites. In order to make the research aims harder to guess, if I were to conduct a similar study on a larger scale I would separate the participants into eight matched groups, and ask the participants in each group to rate only one photograph. The results for all eight groups could then be compared. One other issue with the design of my questionnaire is the space left for participants to answer the open questions. I feel that if larger spaces had been left, participants might have been more inclined to go into detail, giving me a more in-depth understanding of their thoughts, as it was many of the participants wrote very short answers of just a few words. A final flaw with the questionnaire is that the individuals in the photographs do not all have the same facial expressions, and the photographs are taken in different locations. These factors could affect how criminal the individuals are perceived by participants. In order to avoid this problem if the study was to be conducted on a larger scale, photographs could be taken of models in a studio to exact specifications.
I believe that a number of issues, as addressed above, affect the validity of my study. The results could not be truly said to answer the hypothesis question because of the small and unrepresentative sample used in the study. The completed questionnaires show a great deal of individual differences between participants, with some rating an individual as “very likely” to commit a certain crime, and others rating the same individual “very unlikely” the crime. It is impossible to know how typical of the whole population the opinions of the twelve people in my sample are. Because of the small sample size, the reliability of my study is also questionable. I do however believe that with the design changes mentioned in the previous paragraph, the research method is sound, and that the use of a larger, representative sample would be all that was needed to validate, and increase the reliability of the study piloted were it to be conducted on a full scale.
(804 Words)
References
-
(2006) Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System, Ministry of Justice. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/race-and-cjs-stats-2006.pdf
-
(2005) Mall bans shoppers’ hooded tops, BBC News. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/4534903.stm
-
Oliver, M.B & Fonash, D (2003). Race and Crime in the News: Whites' Identification and Misidentification of Violent and Nonviolent Criminal Suspects, Media Psychology.
Appendix 1: Raw Data