• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Marxist view of education

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay on the Marxist view of education I will be looking at and evaluating the Marxist view of education. The theory of Marxist sociologists was developed by Karl Marx a German political philosopher in the 19th century. It is a structuralised approach (individual is less important than the social structure). Marxists see society as characterised by conflicts of interests. Marxists analysis is based on historical materialism; this means that all societies can be characterised by the nature of their mode of production. Society is divided into the infrastructure and the superstructure. The economic base, the infrastructure dictates the activities of all other institutions, which Karl Marx terms as the superstructure. The economy is therefore the most important institution. Marxist sociologists state that the education system is there to serve the interests of the Capitalists. They argue that there are two main groups in society; these are the Ruling class and the Subject class. ...read more.

Middle

They state that the education system produces a subservient workforce. They found that the grades students achieved related more to personality qualities than educational ability. Low grades were related to creativity aggressiveness and independence, while high grades were related to determination consistency, reliability and punctuality. They reject the functionalist view that those who get high qualifications and jobs do so because of their social background and because they do what they are told and work hard. Bowles and Gintis also claim that the hidden curriculum encourages acceptance of hierarchy. Schools are organised on the hierarchical principle of authority and control. This prepares them for relationships within the workplace. Teachers are the ones who give the orders; students are then expected to obey. This relates to their later experience of lack of control in the workplace. They state that pupils learn to be motivated by external rewards for example, educational qualifications. This corresponds with the workplace, workers are motivated by external rewards, a salary or wage. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many pupils break school rules, in one of Willis' studies he found that the working class boys behaved in a way that definitely would not encourage them to be passive workers. Bowles and Gintis ignore the formal curriculum. This is significant in that some of the subjects taught in schools do not encourage uncritical passive behaviour, sometimes the reverse (e.g. communications, law, government and politics etc). Reynolds suggests that Bowles and Gintis fail to sufficiently explain how the economy shapes the education system. He suggests it is not possible for British capitalists to control education as such. Teachers' control to a large extent what occurs in classrooms; they may have quite fundamental ideas. They are not mere capitalist puppets. Bowles and Gintis developed their theory in the 1970's. It is yet still relevant today. The government was responsible for introducing a National Curriculum. This means they have increased control over what occurs in the classroom. Overall, the curriculum has become more openly designed to meet the needs of the economy. Nuray Gungor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and economy.

    The education system disguises this with its myth of meritocracy. Those who are denied success blame themselves and not the system. Their argument is based on studies that are conducted on people with their average IQs. They say that if education was meritocratic they would have similar outcomes, however they found a wide variety of outcomes.

  2. According to Marxist, the main aim of the education system is to provide capitalist ...

    As a result of the fact that the workers will already be accustomed to seeking external gratification for tasks, they will use their wages as the driving force to encourage them to work within the industry that does not cater for their needs.

  1. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and the economy

    The belief in equality of opportunity masks the unfairness of the system. Bowles and Gintis claim that pupils with wealthy and powerful kin tend to acquire high qualifications in school and obtain high-powered jobs when they leave. Whereas working class pupils learn to unquestioningly adapt to the needs of the ruling class, therefore becoming conformist workers.

  2. Religion can both be a conservative force and an initiator of social change. To ...

    Making money was seen as a sign of success and those who were successful did not lose grace in Gods sight. John Wesley quotes: "For religion must necessarily produce industry and frugality, and these cannot but produce riches. We must exhort all Christians to gain what they can and to

  1. The recent rise in support for NRMS comes mainly from an increased desire to ...

    Postmodernists would argue that science is unable to provide solutions to these problems. In the absence of grand narratives (a belief system, such as religion or science, that claims the explain the world), individuals seek their own personal rationale. They become "spiritual shoppers", in that they try out various alternative religions until they find a belief system that they want.

  2. Free essay

    This essay discusses the functionalist and Marxist approach to the relationship between education and ...

    This rests on the assumption that technical education is a productive investment - a means by which societies can bring about and sustain economic growth. Schools, Colleges and universities provide highly educated and trained workers who have the necessary knowledge and skills to make effective use of the advanced productive technologies found in modern industries.

  1. The Reason behind the Increase of Consumer debt and Materialism

    "The average American underestimates his or her credit card debt by a factor of 2" (Schor). Some people start engaging multiple credit cards which only lead them in to deeper debts, ending up in bankruptcy.

  2. Free essay

    Assess Marxist explanations of the role of the state in todays society

    Gramsci did not think of the state as a single institution but rather a dominant class in society; therefore, the ruling class (the state) needed to achieve hegemony to keep control over civil society. Furthermore, Jessop (2002) argues that the workfare state requires the unemployed to acquire skills and become employable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work