Britains Contribution In Europe To The Winning Of The Second World War
Britains Contribution In Europe To The Winning Of The Second World War. It was stated by the President of Russia at the time that there where three factors of Britain winning the Second World War, the first was America who provided the money, next was Britain who proved the time and last was Russia who provided the Blood. President Stalin, the Russian president commanded Russia through the Second World War. He was thought to be a excellent war-time president, as was Churchill. During the war Russia lost 25 Million men and woman to the war effort. This is where the 'BLOOD' came from. The main contribution to the war effort was between the time when we evacuated from Dunkirk until Russia entered the war in early 1941. This was the period known as 'Britain Alone'. At this time we had three choice, give into the German forces, Fight on or come to an agreement. As we were under Churchill at this time we of course decided to fight on. The Germans had hoped that we would come to an agreement. This as they assumed that as we are we are from the same origin as them we would come to an agreement. During 'Britain Alone' we were virtually defenceless. The Battle of Britain Deeply affected the strength of the RAF and we could only rely on the Navy. The RAF was in such disarray as they were losing too many pilots. We could produce the planes but not the top class pilots to fly them.
What was the Contribution of Britain to the Defeat of Germany in the First World War?
What was the Contribution of Britain to the Defeat of Germany in the First World War? There were three main ways in which Britain contributed to Germany's defeat in the First World War. Firstly the British army in both France and Belgium, secondly the British Royal Navy at sea and thirdly the Britains of the Home Front's contribution. The British Expeditionary Force was the first of the British forces to go in to action. The arrived in France the 21 August, and were there to defend Belgium and to stop Germany's Schliefen Plan. Even though the "BEF" only consisted of 100,000 men it had the experiance of the Boer War, and it was well equipped. The German Schliefen Plan was bassed on speed (much like Hitlers Blitzkrieg attacks in the Second World War), the BEF delayed the Schliefen Plan in Mons and Le Cateau in late August 1914. This then gave France enough time to build up her forces and change thier currant plan in order to counter attack in the battle of the Marne. The battle of the Marne forced the Kaisers army to retreat to the river Aisne were they dug trenches and tried to defend themselves. This was the start of trench warfare but there was one more battle for land in Ypres which was the "first battle of Ypres", the BEF managed t ohold off the German attack but at a cost of half of the BEF's forces (50,000 men). The BEF managed to keep the Channel Ports which meant
What was the contribution of Britain to the defeat of Germany in WW1?
What was the contribution of Britain to the defeat of Germany in WW1? Britain contributed to the defeat of Germany in WW1 in several ways, I will write all the reasons and conclude on my thought on which was the most important contribution. The British army in France and Belgium Britain joined the First World War when the Germans invaded neutral Belgium in August 1914. The BEF (British Expeditionary Force) was sent to France to try and defend Belgium and stop the Schlieffen Plan. BEF arrived in France on 21 august and was a small force of 100,00 men. The BEF had experience in the Boer was well trained and equipped. BEF advanced to Mons and delayed the German advance for a full day on 23 august. The Germans suffered heavy casualties, but the BEF retreated as a lack of men. The schlieffen plan depended heavily on speed for success and the BEF action in France and Belgium delayed their plan and gave time for France to launch a counter attack . BEF contributed to the battle of the Marne which forced the Germans to retreat where trench warfare began. Shlieffen plan was unsuccessful and now the German had to fight on two fronts in the west against Britain and France and in the east against Russia. The BEF was successful at the battle of the channel ports 12 October to 11 November. The BEF saved the channel ports for the allies this was very important as it meant that Britain was
Bismarck: How Significant Was His Contribution To German History?
Eduardo Salazar IB History High Sep, 10, 2012 Bismarck: How Significant Was His Contribution To German History Eduardo Salazar IB History High Sep, 10, 2012 Bismarck: How Significant Was His Contribution To German History On April, 1, 1815 Otto Von Bismarck was born unto an aristocratic family in Schönhausen, Germany (northwest of Berlin). After attending a prestigious school and university, he entered the Prussian civil service. Once a man, he embraced Lutheran tradition and soon became a politician in the Prussian legislature where he after gained a reputation as an “ultra-conservative royalist”. In 1851, Bismarck was appointed the position of Prussian representative to the German confederation by King Frederick Wilhelm IV. As a politician, statesman, and the first chancellor, Bismarck’s role in German history proved to be significant to a great extent. Bismarck’s reasonable significance to German history can be noted by inspecting his roles in the 1871 German unification, and through his domestic and foreign policies 1871-1890. Bismarck is known to have created a united Germany by 1871. Bismarck proved to be a significant leader as early as: war with Austria, North German Confederation, Franco-Prussian war, and more. That aside, Bismarck managed to achieve a speedy unification due to his ambition and by defeating the French in 1870. A.J.P. Taylor would
Stalingrad: February 1943 – The German Defeat Sources Questions
Stalingrad: February 1943 - The German Defeat Sources Questions Does Source A explain the reasons for the German surrender at Stalingrad? Explain your answer using Source A and your own knowledge I think that A explains the reasons for the German defeat reasonably well, as there is no reason why Paulus should now lie, as he knew that he was facing defeat. However, I cannot be sure as to whether or not he was still loyal to Hitler. Paulus would have had first hand knowledge as to what was going on, and I know that the stated reasons for defeat were in fact occurring. This was because Hitler was not sending enough reinforcements, and those that he did send did not make it through. The results were that the troops starved, and that the German lines collapsed. This would comply with what Paulus is saying, and that fact that he is requesting immediate surrender shows the desperation of the situation. Therefore, I would say that he is telling the truth and that the basis for the defeat is given, although it is not in very much detail. It is possible that Paulus wanted to glorify his defeat by showing that he went down in the best way possible, although he clearly had not wanted to fight to the end, still showing that the source is reasonably unbiased, as Paulus can be said to have been loyal, at the end, to his own troops only. I think that the source shows good reasons for the
"Assess the importance of Britain's contribution to the defeat of Germany in WWI"
"Assess the importance of Britain's contribution to the defeat of Germany in WWI" Question 1: Describe the strengths and weaknesses of British tanks in World War On. The origin of tanks in world war one was when British, French and Russian engineers and military personnel experimenting with tanks from 1915. Germany was not interested in tanks in the First World War. Tanks also kept on being developed from 1915 onwards. The first tanks in action were in the Battle of the Somme (nov. 1916) and were used by the British. The main purpose of tanks was to overcome the problems of trench warfare. The British had three thousand two hundred tanks on Armistice Day, showing that the British had faith in this weapon. The main reason for inventing the tank was to overcome stalemate and the features that made the tank able to overcome this issue were that the tank had tracks that would work in any terrain, the people inside were protected by a steel hull which would protect them when they were being shot at when attacking and from machine gun and artillery fire. The main tactics used were to just let the tank roll forward and just surprise the enemy. The psychological impact of the tank was enormous as it shocked the Germans extremely, as they saw these weird armored cars rolling towards them. One of the main strengths of the tank was the great interest the media had in it. Also the
History - Reasons for German defeat 1914 - Factors - Schlieffen Plan
8th December 2002 Amy Hancock-Martin History: Reasons for German defeat Factors in order of importance: ) The failure of the Schlieffen Plan in 1914 meant Germany had to fight on two fronts. This is very important as it stretched supplies of men and supplies to keep them going. This failure disheartened the country and destroyed general faith in Moltke who changed the plan. The victory over Germany early on for the allies livened up their spirits and made them the side with better morale. 2) The USA joined the war in April 1917. This gave the allies more economic and industrial strength. The Germans were the reason for the USA entering the war creating a big weakness for them. They had enraged a large power which could so easily have been their key to win the war. A desperate error made by German generals I think: the war could be totally different in outcome. 3) The Spring Offensive of 1918 had failed. The Allied counter-attack pushed the Germans back. The failure of this last attempt to knock the allies out of the war was a failure due to the allied counter attack, this disheartened the troops and those at home. Many believed the war was lost when the Spring offensive was lost. 4) The Royal Navy had defeated German U-boat attempts to halt supplies by using a convoy system. The U-boat convoy
Reasons for German Defeat in the 1st and 2nd World War
ASSES AND COMPARE THE FACTS WHICH LED TO THE DEFEAT OF GERMANY IN THE FIRST AND SECOND WORLD WAR Having excluded smaller and bigger conflicts, we can say without any doubts that modern world has experienced 2 enormous wars which cannot be compared to any other previous battles. As a matter of fact, in both First and Second World Words the alliances were more less arranged similarly and one of the most active aggressor has been always Germany. German proneness to rising conflicts has been always the aspect which interested not only historians but also psychologist. However, despite concerning the fact of easy conflict rising I would rather focus on the inverse aspects. The problem I want to bring about is how did it happen, that the great superpower, which Germany has apparently been was twice defeated so profoundly. Concerning this issue, I raised to the conclusion that the most important aspect of Germans defeat has psychological roots. Thus, the thesis of my essay is that, Germans lost in two wars was determined by their over ambition, which successively brought it's consequences. Germany was only one country in Europe. If they had restrained to capturing only Poland, Austria, and/or some neighborhood (east, south) countries, their invasion would be probably regarded rather as a small local conflict, as it is f. ex. in case of Israel and Palestine, where all western
Was the German defeat on the Western Front caused by the failure of the Schlieffen Plan?
Was the German defeat on the Western Front caused by the failure of the Schlieffen Plan? Alexander Jenkins After German foreign policy had caused the country to have hostile countries on either side - France and Russia - Germany needed a plan to win a war on two fronts. This plan was devised in the early twentieth century by Count Alfred von Schlieffen and then tinkered with fairly extensively by the younger Moltke right up until 1914 It centred on a lightning invasion of France through the Low Countries while keeping light defensive forces on the Eastern Front with Russia, and when France was knocked out to turn the army to the East. It was based on the wars of the 1860s/1870s, which Germany had won: but what it forgot was that the enemy had come on a long way since then, as had technology, especially rapidly-firing machine-guns which favoured the defenders, and the use of rail for rapid military transport. The plan relied on the Russians either being incompetent and slow to mobilize, or just deciding to sit tight; the French also being slow to mobilize; and the Belgians and Luxembourgers being totally submissive to the Germans coming through their countries. The Germans' enemies caused the Schlieffen Plan to fail: the Belgians resisted valiantly, putting the plan a crucial two days behind schedule. This resistance also meant that Britain joined the war against Germany,
In February 1943, the German army surrendered at Stalingrad - Was Hitler's interference the main reason for this defeat?
In February 1943, the German Army Surrendered at Stalingrad. Was Hitler's Interference the Main Reason for this Defeat? Explain your Answer. Operation Barbarossa was the German code name for the attack on Russia, and it was certainly set to be a big attack. For Barbarossa Hitler assembled three million troops, 3500 tanks and 2700 aircraft, it was also in anticipation and expectation to be very big, Hitler himself claimed 'When Barbarossa commences, the world will hold its breath'. There were a variety of reasons shown while Hitler spoke of his bold plans to move east and invade the Soviet Empire, both given military and political. Hitler needed Russia's plentiful raw materials to support his army and population, there was lots of oil in the Caucasus and wheat in Ukraine. Hitler also had an obsession with racial ideals, he felt that the Russians were an 'inferior' Slav race, and therefore only fit as slaves for the idealistic Germany Hitler was creating. This feeling of superiority also gave Hitler the confidence as he decided there would be little resistance against the racially superior German's. It was also well established that Hitler loathed the communist power, which contributed to his expansion, as well as his striving for 'living space' (Lebensraum). Hitler strived for a better comfort for his much loved home nation. It may seem however, ironic that two powers that
