The history of women as erotic subjects in art is endless.

Authors Avatar

Chapter One

         

The history of women as erotic subjects in art is endless; therefore in this chapter I am going to look at why in some cases, the female nude was so shocking. As this is a wide subject I am going to look at two main pieces; Titian ‘Venus of urbino’ 1538 and Edouard Manet’s ‘Olympia’ 1865.

Titian is stated to be the greatest and most versatile artist of the Venetian Renaissance. Titian excelled in portraiture, religious picture and mythological scenes.

 Titian’s nudes were from mythological scenes, mostly basing his females on goddess’s favourably Venus, and these are embodiments of Neoplatonic ideas. Neoplatonism came from the philosopher Plato who believed that the visible world was a reflection of a mythological heavenly world. This was a popular belief in Titian’s time, which is why art was based on mythological scenes set in modern settings.

   Titian’s most famous Venus was his most disputed; the Venus of urbino, acquired in 1538 by Guidobaldo II della Rovere, duke of Camerino and Urbino as a possible matrimonial gift. There are three theories, which attempt to explain the paintings meaning; That the Venus is from the mythology, a wedding picture or pornography. To understand the painting and its effect we must look at the society at that time. Women in the sixteenth century were seen as inferior to men. Men at were in control of the society at that time including women.

Women were often portrayed in art at that time as objects of beauty; this is why they were portrayed as goddesses.

 If the female nude was accepted in their society then why did Titian Venus of urbino cause such an outrage? This is because it broke away from the traditions at that time; the female nude was often portrayed in mythological scenes, which was accepted as it didn’t directly express the male sexual interest in the female body.

The Venus image is clearly a product of renaissance art; she stands for both sensuality and classism that were typical of this era-but Titian’s Venus is unusual as it depicts the female nude as beholding the beholder. Titian broke away from the “norm” of this era by creating an image that interacts with its audience. 50 years before hand Botticelli’s ‘Birth of Venus’ was also said to be a wedding gift to Lorenzo de’Medici. The scene involved Venus, the Greek goddess of love and beauty, being born from the sea. She stands on a shell, covering her naked body with arms and hair elegantly, clearly showing a Greek myth.  Titian on the other hand is relaxing and gazing at the viewer in a coy manner, in contrast to Botticelli’s shows a dream like innocent face. They also used different techniques such as Boticelli ignored perspective and Titian created distance between Venus and the servants in the background. Both were made for Aristocratic families and both were perceptions of the goddess Venus, but gave very different impressions. There were both innovative of there times as Botticelli painted the naked Venus for the first time since the medieval ages, and Titian painted her as reacting with the audience in a domestic scene perocatively.

Join now!

 Titian’s Venus appears in her bedroom. She is shown lying nude on her bed. The composition has been split into two sections; Venus is in the foreground and her servants are in the background. She is a feminine, voluptuous (typical of the fashion for large women at that time), and clearly an image of idealised beauty.

 The are a number of points that show that the image of Venus is of a sexual nature; the naked young women looks frankly at the beholder; her nipples are erect; her left hand is gently covering her genital area in an inviting manor. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay