'The customer is king' is true in theory, but mostly an ignoble lie in practice.

Authors Avatar

Masters must be servants 

Failures in customer service are the fault of bosses, not staff, argues Robert Heller 

Sunday November 5, 2000
The Observer 

'The customer is king' is true in theory, but mostly an ignoble lie in practice. The customers have moved to centre stage in management thought and talk, but in real life they remain, not monarchs, but second-class citizens.

A whole new discipline, customer relationship management, or CRM, has been created and nourished by heavy corporate spending. Consultants plot 'value chains' backwards from the supposedly satisfied customer, and work out irresistible 'customer value propositions'. Call centres mushroom in unlikely locales to serve the customer better - and service just gets worse.

In this customer-oriented culture, the internet is meant to reinforce the revolution by providing better, faster access and response. But companies actually selling over the net appear, according to a new survey, to be even less responsive in cyberspace than on earth. The PLAUT business and technology consultancy, investigating returns policy and performance, found that only 15 per cent of surveyed e-retailers offered excellent service. The rest provided after-sales treatment that ranged from mediocre to abysmal.

Service failure is not skin-deep. Its causes go far into the heart of management performance. The mistakes are never isolated, unfortunate examples. They invariably spring from defects of the system and those who design and supervise that system. The great American quality guru, W Edwards Deming, had it right: 85 per cent of all defects are down to management - not to the workers.

No doubt, airline managements, for example, claim to strain nerve and sinew to serve customers better in the skies. Back on earth, though, you sometimes can't contact their salespeople at all. Call centres refer you uselessly around the press-button menus, tell you that 'all our operators are busy' (as if you didn't know) and that your call 'is being held in a queue', which you also know full - and furiously - well.

Adding patronising insult to injury, an automated voice may tell you that 'your custom is valuable to us', thank you for your patience (as if you had any alternative), and even (this is British Airways) boast that the endless wait is down to the success of their latest wondrous promotion. All this is laced together, naturally, by hideous music. Try to ring BA's head office to scream for help, and you find, bizarrely, that nothing is listed, only an 0345 number - which takes you straight back into Voicemail Hell.

All customer relationships rest on personal contact between the buyer and the seller. There are sound reasons, apart from lower cost, for automating that contact as much as possible. But the systems have brought down an iron wall be-tween customers and suppliers. This is strange, since the supplier's staff also shop and buy. Top managements must surely sometimes be infuriated by other people's awful systems. Why do they persist with their own?

Join now!

The answer runs deep into the realities of management. Executives talk about customers as if they are some strange and separate breed, described with demeaning phrases like 'punters' and 'bums on seats'. The executive bums are similarly insensitive to the most important customers of all - their own staff. These customers depend on top management for sensible strategic direction, the effective operation of efficient systems, and proactive treatment as humans, not as 'human resources'.

When staff are mismanaged, customers inevitably suffer. That's why travel expert Hal Rosenbluth entitled his book on customer service The Customer Comes Second. To put ...

This is a preview of the whole essay