Evaluate the ways in which emotion might enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way of knowing. To start this essay I will define the most important words as I understand them therefore emotion and reasoning
Evaluate the ways in which emotion might enhance and/or undermine reasoning as a way of knowing. To start this essay I will define the most important words as I understand them therefore emotion and reasoning will be defined and second I will explain the question. Emotion is what we feel as a reaction towards a person or situation for example: anger, love, and fear. Reasoning is logic, how we argument something, the way we make decisions or how we think and therefore it is how we react to situations. This question is asking us to explain how emotion can make it easier or harder to reason appropriately so it becomes a better or worse way of knowing. Emotion has a very big influence on most people's way of reasoning sometimes it makes this reasoning more reliable and in other cases emotion makes it less reliable. In the following essay the question will be answered from both sites. Emotion might enhance and/or undermine reasoning in several ways for example when you are happy you reason in a positive way but if you are sad or in a bad mood you reasoning is more negative. For example a man that had been promoted in his job he has a car accident and his car is in a very bad state, he firstly will think about that his insurance will pay for the damage. In the other site if a man has been fired from his job and he has a car accident under the same conditions as that other man,
Crossing to Safety and The Sweet Hereafter
Crossing to Safety and The Sweet Hereafter The long summer has led me to produce a few thoughts on the assigned summer reading. While reading the books The Sweet Hereafter and Crossing to Safety I have discovered the importance of first person. By comparing the books I have found how the first person viewpoint relates to the characters, the action, and how the novels differ by author in their style of writing. The Sweet Hereafter has an interesting approach to sending us on a journey through the story. By having four narrators we get to see all the angles around the main event. One narration in particular, Billy Ansel, gives us an eye witness account of the featured action in the novel. "The swerve off the road to the right, the skid, the smashing of the guard rail and the snow bank; and then the tilted angled plummet down the embankment to the sand pit, where, moving fast and somehow still upright, the bus slid across the ice to the far side; and then the ice letting go and the rear half of the yellow bus being swallowed at once by the freezing blue green water." Here we see how the first person can be used for action sequences. Because Billy Ansel was the only eyewitness, it is imperative that Russell Banks puts in his account in his own words, thoughts and feelings. Using the first person is one way to depict action, but it is also an efficient way to describe
Brechtian Performance- Message Delivery
Our group explored and used a variety of different Brechtian techniques. Our chosen form of "social improvement" was "safe sex", and we chose to use a parody of the well-known Bible tale of Genesis to deliver our message, hence juxtaposing contemporary society. We presented it with quite a lot of satire, with physical comedy (the banana and the throwing of clothes whilst Adam [Ryan] and Eve [Steph] were behind the curtains) as well as verbal comedy ("But God said we could do anything but touch the bananas!"). This example of verbal comedy was to parody God's command to not touch the apples in the book of the Bible. We also had a narrator (Rebekka) who proved to be effective and acted in the style of a "Brechtian" narrator. We had individuals step out of the group to address the audience too - God (Jasmin) talked directly to the audience. This is a very popular Brechtian technique as it breaks the "fourth wall" and jars the audience. God and the narrator also gave stage directions, an example of self-reference which is again jarring for the audience. Since we used a Biblical story, there is already the presence of God, who made the judgment on characters in the end and resolved piece of epic theatre - another Brechtian technique. Also, when God entered, the music We Will Rock You was played in the background, juxtaposing God's holiness and seriousness and creating opportunities
As Carl Jung stated " As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light of meaning in the darkness of mere being".
As Carl Jung stated " As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light of meaning in the darkness of mere being". Reflecting on what it is to be a person raises profound questions which have been very much the concern of two major psychological perspectives: the psychoanalysis and the humanistic psychology. Some of this questions are: Why do we act and feel in the way we do, how far are we open or fixed to change, if we can change aspects of who we are how we can do it or how can we make sense in the subjective worlds in which we exist. As we will see both perspectives will approach these matters and will focus on the subjectivity, exploring aspects of our inner life. The major contributors to these perspectives are Sigmund Freud who created psychotherapy and psychodynamics at the start of the 20th century, and inside the humanistic perspective, Carl Rogers who developed the person centred therapy during the 1960's as a cultural emphasis on emancipation from tradition and exploration of new ideas and attitudes. One problem in comparing these two approaches lays in the fact that they make rather different kinds of contribution to counselling and they can not be compare like with like. However both perspectives offer different models of the person and different ways of bringing about personal change, so they do present some interesting
Write a Critical Comparison Analysing the Content and Literary Devices Used in Marquez's Bon Voyage, Mr
Write a Critical Comparison Analysing the Content and Literary Devices Used in Marquez's Bon Voyage, Mr. President, Your Reconstruction And Your Free Choice Extract By Akash Bodalia Bon Voyage, Mr President is a short story written by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. This is a tale of a South American President in exile. Nearing the end of his days, we are given an insight into the life of a man with injured pride, reminiscing the days that went by and so fast, where the President had lost everything he had worked for and knew. Quotes Bon Voyage, Mr. President 'Resting on the silver handle of his cane' This quotation emphasises the Presidents elegance and importance. His importance is enforced by the fact he carries a cane and not a common walking stick. A cane being the common tool of intimidation used by the military and by those who feel they are superior to the average civilian. The silver handle on the cane illustrates his elegance. He had style, elegance and capital, as well as authority, his overall effect being a man of status. 'He was one more incognito in the city of illustrious incognitos' This quotation is a contradiction. Incognito means in disguise, while illustrious means to stand out. This paradox sums up the President; he wants to not be noticed, but still wants fame. So while wearing clothes everyone else was wearing, something would make him stand
Assume that a patient is terminally ill, and has given consent for the physician to use one of three
Dovid Thomas 5/8/2007 Topic #2 :00 Assume that a patient is terminally ill, and has given consent for the physician to use one of three physician assisted suicide methods: that a physician may inject him with a death-hastening dosage of morphine, that a physician may unplug him from a life-sustaining respirator, or a physician gives him a prescription for a drug that he (the patient) plans to use to commit suicide. In no way is it conceivable to hold two of these methods morally permissible, while holding the third morally impermissible. The only thing that one could say to make the three of these methods differ is that in the third, the doctor has only prescribed the medicine. There is still the chance that the patient will decide not to take the medicine, or in the middle of the dosage quit, and still be able to be helped. But in the first two methods, once the patient gives the word, there is no going back, because by the time he decides that he would like to live, the doctor has already killed the patient. In considering this, one must realize that the three methods are all still methods that all stem from the same idea: a sick patient whom probably cannot think straight, is probably unable to do anything physically, and most likely does not fully understand how far away they might be from recovery or how much better or worse the pain might get. Even more importantly,
Speaking out for those without a voice
Speaking out for those without a voice Response phase Stimulus text one - Poem by Pastor Martin Niemoller The class was split into groups to discus the poem. We discussed what feeling and emotion the author was trying to portray and how the poem made us think about and feel. The poem had a repetitive feel and used the same line 'I didn't speak up because....' and 'then they came for...' to end each line. This was insistent repetitiveness, which gave the feeling of time going by. The poem is very matter of fact and simple, which makes it more emotive. From reading the poem I made an educated guess that the 'They' that kept being referred to were the Nazis who took power in 1933. This gave us an idea for the era and social background to the poem. In my group we all asked the question 'Why did he not speak out?'. We know he was a religious man because of his title, however he hasn't adopted the Christian duty of speaking up for those without a voice. The first thing that came to mind was fear and oppression. The poem suggests that over time these minority groups, like the Jews, were being taken to concentration camps without much opposition from them or the people in the community around them. The last line ' Then they came for me- and by that time no one was left to speak out' gives a feeling of immense guilt and regret. It creates the image of the speaker being alone and
We didn't want the audience to see the story from just one point of view; we wanted to show it from the point of view of the police, Stefan, and our point of view from the performances
Development We hoped that from the scenes that we created we would create them so that the audience would understand the story at a deeper level, and sympathise with Stefan and understand how he felt and why he felt like he did. We wanted to show why Stefan was seen as the criminal and unable to defend and stand up for himself, as he had been the butt of jokes at school and at work. We didn't want the audience to see the story from just one point of view; we wanted to show it from the point of view of the police, Stefan, and our point of view from the performances. The audience would obviously have their own point of view of what happened, but we wanted them to see that not everyone in life gets a fair trial whilst with the police, which is what happened with Stefan. The pieces what we did were successful, the ones that we did, and the ones that we watched, made us realise what the story was about and understand it more thoroughly. Each scene that we did was strongly based on the story, and we covered pretty much everything that was needed. The scenes had to be serious, the pieces would not have worked if they had been filled with comedy, the only comedy that we put into our pieces were the things that the people at school and co workers did when he was working at school or at the office. We had to keep the scenes to the point, if we did too much on a certain scene and put
Chapter 5, Pg. 188-190 - Extrasensory Perception,
Diana Boyd Psysc 100.001 MWF 1-1:50 Paper #2 Chapter 5, Pg. 188-190 - Extrasensory Perception, "Science and the Paranormal" February 23, 2004 An ad for the infamous psychic, Miss. Cleo, plays across my television screen. She claims she can read my mind, predict my future, and give me advice on how to live my life. And, best of all, the first five minutes of my reading are free! My logical self tells me that Miss. Cleo is nothing but a scam for money; I mean come on, no one can read a person's mind - especially over the telephone! Then again, my curiosity sets in and I wonder, "Well, it's free, what's the harm in trying? What if Miss. Cleo really is a psychic?" But like usual, my logic wins and I'm left to wonder about Miss. Cleo and her "abilities". Amid the recent news of lawsuits against Miss. Cleo, one in particular filled by the Federal Trade Commission, America finds out that yes, Miss. Cleo is a fraud. She scams customer's money by keeping them on hold for the first five minutes, and then charges ridiculous amounts of money for each minute thereafter. Her predictions are said to be vague and applicable to almost anyone, and while I'm sure Miss. Cleo can give a person advice about their life, it's not exactly the advice one might be in search of. In fact, extrasensory perception (ESP), as defined by Dennis Coon's Essentials of Psychology, is the "purported
'Crossing over is an unconventional ghost story in that it doesn't adhere to traditional expectations. Explain uses of atmosphere in a variety of techniques. '
'Crossing over is an unconventional ghost story in that it doesn't adhere to traditional expectations. Explain uses of atmosphere in a variety of techniques. ' Although this story is unconventional it employs many techniques found in the more conventional ghost stories, use of tension, suspense and doubt. Storr takes and develops all that is in the more conventional story, applying it in different ways to crossing over. The writer continually questions the way in which we prioritise life and also questions our own sense of reality. In an almost kierkergaardien style Storr prioritises life which is described, by overshadowing it with the characters death at the end, for example the triviality of the girls worries,( 'she shouldn't go back...disagreeable task,') are indeed proven to be minor in comparison to the 'nothingness that pervades being'. In questioning the girls reality she too questions the reality of the reader, highlighting one of our main fears, that we don't exist, for we realise that as the character notices that she cant distinguish between her own death and living states so too do we find it impossible to prove at any point, for certain, that we are not dreaming rather than being in a waking state. This doubt accentuates the stories negative - death, while belief in what we appear to be told chooses to ignore the negative. Only at the end of the story are our