• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Dialogue between the Soul and Body by Andrew Marvell

Extracts from this document...


Lauren Carnegie Jack Hill LT111 A Dialogue between the Soul and Body by Andrew Marvell Marvell's poem shows the body and soul as two separate entities, both with conscious thought and the ability to express themselves. Both have conflicting views of their purpose in being, together with the pain inflicted by the other, In a vain head, and a double heart? The Soul complains that the head is too self-obsessed, i.e. with the body, and cares little for the well being of the soul. Also within this line Marvell shows two hearts beating as one, plus a physical reference to the double ventricles of the heart. Marvell lays foundation in science for the explanation of these two entities living and breathing together, but also shows their two separate roles by the conflict in which they partake, A body that could never rest, Since this ill spirit it possessed? Marvells use of 'rest' implies that the body cannot have peace until it is relieved of the soul, but also that the body is a foundation or support for it. ...read more.


does heat, Or hatred's hidden ulcer eat; Marvell uses images of serious physical ailments in comparison to emotional sufferings to express the extent to which the soul harms the body i.e., paralysis, epidemics and ulcers. Even the emotions that, supposedly, produce pleasure are described as 'perplexing'. He shows the mutual sufferings that they cause each other through emotions, but also through the imagery of confinement and torture that the body inflicts on the soul, With bolts of bones, that fettered stands In feet, and manacled in hands The body is seen as a hindrance on the freedom of the soul and with the use of restraints Marvell expresses the torture inflicted by this and the extent of liberty that the soul possesses. The body retorts by showing its own restraint and describing the soul as a tyrant who invades his consciousness with frivolous emotions. Which, stretched upright, impales me so, That mine own precipice I go; The body recognises that he owes his consciousness to the soul but expresses it as a superfluous entity. ...read more.


We see the contrasting images of man-made and nature being joined together to create Grosart's 'incongruity'. Within this poem Marvell shows a witty account of the different responsibilities of the soul and body, but also the pain that the external world impresses upon us. Marvell enhances the wit of the poem by the repetitive rhythm of the stanzas and increases the feeling of a constant banter between the two beings. We are shown the pain that each impresses upon the other, but also the parallels between the 'lives' that they lead. Marvell expresses the soul as a partner to the body rather than an innate entity, which creates differing opinions and an argumentative tone. Marvell's appliance of logical argument in 'A Dialogue between the Soul and Body' shows the complexity of the human composition, which we take for granted. The contrast of wit with a logical debate, at first, conveys the simplicity of the poem, but as Marvells builds the argument we are given the logical flow of the inflictions we are exposed to in life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Andrew Marvell section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Andrew Marvell essays

  1. Examine the ways in which the poets in

    All the flea took was a drop of blood - how could it be guilty? Similarly, all he wants is her virginity - how could that be guilty? His argument is slightly different once again in the final lines of the poem, "Yet thou triumph'st and say'st that thou Find'st not thyself nor me the weaker now."

  2. What are the main characteristics of the metaphysical poets?

    Donne loves variety as a natural embellishment and it is a 'true ornament of verse'. We can see this by comparing the poems. The three-stanza argument in 'The Flea' is used again in other poems of Donne. But the fluency of the stanza in 'The Flea' leading to the triplet

  1. The Metaphysical Poets: John Donne and Andrew Marvell.

    one another out of feare; For love, all love of other sights controules, And makes one little roome, an every where." By the most natural and unobtrusive of images, their literal awakening after, we assume, a night of passion and lovemaking, is made to suggest the awakening of their souls into a new clarity of feeling, a new certainty.

  2. The two poems which I am comparing are by Andrew Marvell and John Donne ...

    beauty shall no more be found, nor, in thy marble vault, shall sound'. Marvell uses a conceit to emphasis how useless her beauty will be if they do not give in to their desires. Further, all his worries, 'his echoing song' is that he doesn't want her to die a

  1. Compare and contrast Andrew Marvell's

    He varies the punctuation to break up the rhyme to create effect. Marvell portrays an idyllic image by using alliteration. He uses many images to give us a direct view of the situation and help us understand the poem fully.

  2. Cannabis, and it's effects on humans.

    I think that Connie's ideas on Cannabis and other drugs are controversial. Legalising Cannabis is one way to stop crime, but there must be another way.

  1. Andrew Marvell (1621-1678) and Christina Walsh (1750-1800?) Poetry comparison

    The language and imagery of the final lines present her ideal partnership. The first line shows her desire for passion, the second shows her lust for marriage and the third shows her wish to live and die happily with a partner at her side.

  2. 'Occasionally an anti-climax can be surprisingly effective'- Andrew Crocker-Harris How successful is Ratttigan's The ...

    Both were unable to fulfil the others need. Millie fulfilled her need for sex through her many affairs, a very scandalous thing, whereas Andrew always has a gap in his life where his kind of love should be. It is unfair that Andrew never gets what he requires from this doomed marriage, and that he remains faithful while

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work