After reading the two poems Digging and Follower, discuss the relationship that Heaney writes about between himself and his father.

Authors Avatar

Chetak Barot 10A        English Essay

Seamus Heaney

After reading the two poems Digging and Follower, discuss the relationship that Heaney writes about between himself and his father.

I am going to compare two different poems written by Seamus Heaney. The names of these two poems are “Digging” and “Follower”. Both of these poems were written when Seamus Heaney had started his career in poetry. Heaney was the eldest of nine children and grew up in poor conditions, as his father was a potato farmer, just as his forefathers. The poems are basically Heaney's autobiography, where he is explaining what happened in his past. Heaney was born when there were Catholic and Protestant riots were occurring and it was a troubled time for him and his family.

The two poems are similar because they both describe Heaney at a young age, when he used to be “tripping, falling, yapping always”. This was meant to prove that Heaney was always behind his father, but the second poem has a real twist to it at the end, which I will describe to you further in to this essay.

        Heaney is probably writing this poem in his room, and looking out into his old farm which is bringing back his memories of being a child. His room would be dimly lit to show the bluntness in his vocabulary. This also depicts that fact that his language is not flowery, or there is no glorification of any part of his father’s job, but just going straight to the point. He does not in any way denigrate the job either, but just keeps it simply and straight to the point. I think that Heaney would’ve been in his dimly lit room (as explained above) and is picturing his father in a hat, with a grey coat on and his “coarse boot nestled on the lug, against the inside knee was levered firmly”. Heaney’s language here conveys to us the point that he used language that reflects the traditional down-to-earth nature of his ancestors. What I mean here, is that most other writers would glorify these sentences and add extra vocabulary to add to the effect, but Heaney’s draws in the reader’s interest by keeping it simple and concise.

        The relationship between Heaney and his father is exposed in the second line, “The squat pen rests; snug as a gun”, and it can be compared to line 4, “Then the spade sinks…” Here, Heaney is trying to force through the point that his father’s profession was a farmer, and his weapon was a spade, whereas, Heaney’s profession is a writer and his dangerous weapon is the pen. The pen also had enormous power and when the pen is used incorrectly, it can too cause damage. Heaney’s pen gives him the eccentricity and power which he felt he lacked as a child due to the restricted conditions. The pen freed him from his restrictions that he had a child and the pen if offering him dangerous new possibilities. This emphasises the point that Heaney lacked attention and had wished to get it with the power of his pen. Heaney believes that the pen can be as powerful as the spade. This is proven in line 2 – “The squat pen rests; snug as a gun”. This means that when the pen is not in use, it is just a potential threat, but when it is used incorrectly, it can be as dangerous as a gun, and a gun is surely more powerful than a spade.

Join now!

The relationship between him and his father is flowing at times, for example, when enjambment is used between lines five and six. “My father digging. I look down Till his straining rump among the flowerbeds”. The second stanza ends at the word “down” and the third stanza begins at the word “Till”. Enjambment is used to keep the rhythm of the poem continuously flowing and to keep the readers in the frame of the poem. Enjambment is also used to show that the poem is digging further into his memories.  

Heaney liked harsh and blunt sounds such as “lug”, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay