An analysis of the ways in which two non-fiction texts present a biased account of the Derek Bentley case.

Authors Avatar

An analysis of the ways in which two non-fiction texts present a biased account of the Derek Bentley case.

In this essay I will be analysing two biased sources of information, the first, a newspaper article and the second a film presenting an account of what happened.

 The newspaper account focuses on the death of the detective by alleged gangsters, whilst the film focuses on the unjust hanging of an innocent man with learning difficulties.

 The newspaper article is lifted from the Daily mail printed on the 3rd of November 1952, a right wing tabloid newspaper. This longstanding right wing newspaper was popular with the Conservative supporting public and its readers would mostly have been on the site of law and order, the police and other authorities. It would not have been have had liberal or sympathetic views about the perpetrators of the crime or been interested in what drove them to committing such a crime, as some liberal or left wing newspaper do today.

         The newspaper article is headlined “Chicago gun battle in London: gangsters with machine guns on roof kill detective, wound another”, this headline immediately seeds in peoples minds thoughts of; gangsters fighting and bandits with machine guns. The word Chicago brings to mind a very rough and violent place in America that people would have seen in films about Al Capone. The headline also tells readers that a detective has been murdered and another wounded whilst doing their duty, this makes the readers feel sympathetic towards the dead detective and his wounded colleague and assume that they were shot by violent and brutal gangsters. The article goes on to use key words and phrases such as; the London crime wave, battle of Sidney street, bandits, gangsters, Sten gun and gunmen. These words and phrases raise feeling of anger and fear in the reader towards the two young men who were involved in the armed robbery. In the last two paragraphs the article highlights the bravery and courage of the two offices, detective constable Miles and PC Frederick Fairfax.

Join now!

Printing their names and rank conveys to the reader a picture of two young men fighting crime to protect the public. It goes further to tell us that detective constable Miles was married with two children; it states “he was killed” which immediately makes us picture a grieving widow and two fatherless children, fuelling the readers anger even more.

 This article was printed without the facts being known, it exaggerates greatly using melodramatic language like; gangsters and bandits when they were just youths causing trouble. It calls the gun a machine gun and suggests that there is more than one ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

There is some good analysis of both sources in this response; however there is not enough cross over made between the two sources to make this a comparative essay. You need to make a point about one and then find a way to link to the other source. 4 Stars