Analysing the Introduction of King Lear's Character in Act 1of 'King Lear'

Authors Avatar

Analysing the Introduction of King Lear's Character in Act 1of 'King Lear'

King Lear's character is introduced as the foolhardy tragic hero doomed by his own irrationality. He is consistently portrayed as short-sighted and immature, bound by his own shortfalls as he intertwines himself in superficial love triangles.

     The play commences in King Lear's palace where two chief characters are discussing Lear dividing out his kingdom amongst his most favoured son-in-law. This hints Lear's nature yet we are not exposed to his character until Kent and Gloucester have finished conversing. This arouses reader curiosity and interest.

     Lear arrives soon after and we discover how he has no qualms about operating using the royal 'we' as he launches straight into talk of sharing his kingdom. He appears as blunt and informal in terms of his attitude. He prolongs this manner as he expresses to his daughters how he wishes to "Unburdened crawl toward death". This indicates Lear's immature wish to revert to babyhood by the employment of the word "crawl" after his transition, while discarding his adult responsibilities and vexations.  Already the reader can observe his attitude of no obligation to his country or anyone after he shifts power.

     Furthermore, Lear's sermon makes explicit his shallow countenance. He demonstrates materialism as he requests:

Which of you…love us most…our largest bounty may extend

He desires his daughters to display to him their love, as it will grant them a higher share. This portrays Lear's rash and insecure mentality. It establishes to the reader how he revels in sycophantic behaviour whether it be accurate or deceitful, as he is none the wiser since he appears encompassed in a personal ego promotion. He exhibits vulnerability as he offers incredible wealth to his offspring in return for honesty yet he is naïve of human nature. This supports the view of his lack of foresight and immaturity.

Join now!

     After, Lear requires his youngest daughter, Cordelia to speak in the quest for her share as he offers perhaps "A third more opulent than your sisters…". This illustrates Lear's possible greater affection and partiality towards her. However, through his obstructed views, when she declines with "nothing, my lord" he continues to inquire "nothing?" -again exhibiting his favouritism granting more occasion to speak- resulting in "Nothing will come of nothing…". This contradicts his principles, as he is the prime motivator of disorder since he states how in her lack of attempt to please him she will ruin her prospects ...

This is a preview of the whole essay