At the end of the novel the Naval Officer says, "I know. Jolly good show, like The Coral Island." Why did Golding choose to end the novel with such a mistaken view?
At the end of chapter 12 suddenly Ralph looks up to see a naval officer standing over him. The officer tells the boy that his ship has come to the island after seeing the blazing fire in the jungle. Jack's hunters reach the beach; upon seeing the officer, they stop in their tracks. The officer, stunned at the sight of this group of bloodthirsty child-savages, asks Ralph to explain. When he learns what has happened on the island, the officer is reproachful: how could this group of boys, he asks, and English boys at that, have lost all reverence for the rules of civilisation in so short a time?
After Ralph's tense, exciting stand against the hunters, the ending of Lord of the Flies is rife with irony. Throughout the book, Ralph has thought that a signal fire was the only way to lure rescuers to the island, and the fire has been a symbol of civilisation. Now, the navy ship is lured to the island by fire, but rather than being the ordered signal fire of civilisation, it is the haphazard forest fire set by Jack's hunters solely for the purpose of killing Ralph. Throughout the book, Ralph has worked assiduously to retain the structure of civilisation and maximise the boys' chances of being rescued. Now, when all he can do is struggle to stay alive as long as possible, the improbable and unexpected character introduced to resolve a situation of the naval officer appears at the last possible moment to bring the boys back to the world of law, order, and society.