Both Nothing's Changed and Two Scavengers deal with social injustices, however, there are some big differences between them.

Authors Avatar

Read and examine the poetry from two very different cultures. Although

 they are both dealing with contrasting societies, explore how each one

 presents the issue of social injustice and decide which of the two

 demonstrates more outrage at the injustice explored.

Both “Nothing's Changed” and “Two Scavengers” deal with social injustices, however, there are some big differences between them.

“Nothing's Changed” is set in Cape Town, Africa and focuses on the segregation of black and white people, after an apartheid was made. It is an autobiographical poem by Tatumkhulu Afrika.

 The poem is about how District Six used to be a place for blacks and whites to live together. But when that changed, Tatumkhulu left in anger (and prison). Now he has returned to his old home after many years and has discovered that the segregation has gotten wider and worse. The social injustice in the poem is the black and white segregation. On the other hand, “Two Scavengers” deals with the social segregation between the classes in America. At a set of traffic lights, early in the morning (9am), a garbage truck has stopped next to a couple in a Mercedes. The garbage men then ponder on the class system and how they are less respected by people like this couple. They wonder if they'd ever be seen as equals as they wonder if the democracy of America really works. The social injustice in the poem is the way the different classes are each treated differently. The first stanza of “Nothing's Changed” is setting the scene as the writer walks towards his old home. We can tell that the area is now a wasteland by what the writer treads over (like the cans and weeds) on his walk back home. We can tell he's angry from how his old home has turned out from when he says, “The hot, white, inwards turning anger of my eyes”, as he knows he has returned home.

Join now!

Although all of the stanzas use commas a lot, the second stanza uses “and” after each comma. I feel that the commas are used to in order to add more expression as you read, and as you pause at each comma, you wonder what's coming next, thus creating suspense even though, in my opinion, the poem is not that exciting or interesting enough for it to have any use. On the other hand, the “ands” that are used throughout the second stanza, instead picks up the pace as we experience what he is going through at the same time that ...

This is a preview of the whole essay