Brave New World

Authors Avatar

What are Mustapha Mond’s arguments against freedom?  Is there any validity to them?  Do you think there is a ‘winner’ of his debate with John?

Mustapha Mond’s arguments are mainly put across during chapter sixteen, through his debate with John.  He feels that stability and conditioning are key to society.  Without conditioning, there would no be stability and to him stability is paramount to create an ideal utopia.  He says, ‘Our world is not the same as Othello’s world.  You can’t make tragedies without social instability.  The world’s stable now.  People are happy; they get what they want’.  This is true to a certain extent- they’re well off; they’re safe; they’re never ill; they’re ignorant of passion, etc. ‘And if anything should go wrong, there’s always soma’.  However, it is important to consider that do they really know what happiness really is?  If they are ignorant of passion they cannot feel deeply as we do.

Join now!

Another value at the heart of Brave New World is consumerism- the gratification of desires or appetites.  This is a world that suppresses initiative and everything we hold sacred in place for consumer values.  If consumption is ‘happiness’, Mond refers to the other value, therefore stability.  From Mond’s point of view, ‘Happiness and stability depend on each other’.  This is economic stability but emotional, social, psychological stability are created through economic consumption.

There are four main areas that Mond feels worth sacrificing in place for stability.  The first things are feelings, passions, commitments, relationships.  This is because mothers, fathers, children ...

This is a preview of the whole essay