By a close analysis of the language, form and structure of Acts 1 and 2, consider the ways in which love is depicted and how Romeo and Juliet come to be married

Authors Avatar by colourmescarlet (student)

By a close analysis of the language, form and structure of Acts 1 and 2, consider the ways in which love is depicted and how Romeo and Juliet come to be married

In the first two acts of William Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’, the context is set immediately, and the events follow in the form of prophecy, as the chorus told the audience what to expect straight away, therefore immediately giving the play context before the characters themselves have been seen; it states within the first few lines ‘A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life’, seeming at first very simple, as the assumption is it would be Romeo and Juliet. However, interestingly, Romeo appears to be besotted with Rosaline in his first introduction. But since the audience knows the ending, they will not be distracted by suspense, but interest into how they come to take place and the language the characters use. The main depictions of love are portrayed as equally as those of hate, in a play which is considered to be a romance. This is because the circumstance in which Romeo and Juliet’s love is born is that of a deep family feud which imperatively forms a rift between them. They must both struggle with the hate they are obliged to feel for each other by their family, and the love they both believe they feel for each other, apparently instantaneously. The language and imagery the characters use throughout the play portray the contrast of the feelings of each character, and the events which take place.

The course of events which lead to the marriage of Romeo and Juliet takes place in a sequence of hate and suspicion, not completely of love. Their meeting occurs primarily as a result of the Montague’s wishing to interrupt the Capulet’s ball. Any other reunions then take place under very secret circumstances as their families loathe each other. Juliet then suggests their marriage under the suspicion that his affections may not be true and constant, and does not entirely trust him as she says ‘if that thy bent of love be honorable, thy purpose marriage’. Her reasons for mistrusting the one she loves is the disadvantage she has of having declared her love without being aware the object of it was listening. She also must marry him if she is still to be considered a maid, so does not want to be used by him. This juxtaposition of distrust and hate alongside the love and affection the characters feel for each other creates the dramatic irony throughout the play. As well as the differences in portrayal of feeling, it is also ironic as the audience knows throughout the play that they will eventually die.

Join now!

With this hindsight, we can see Friar Lawrence marrying them is an affirmation of what is to come, and in making them husband and wife, he is also seals their imminent deaths. However his opinion of their marriage is different, considering what he does not know. He believes that their marriage may ‘turn [their] households rancor to pure love’.  He has a great deal of influence over whether the marriage takes place at all, and provides an impartial opinion as he is a man of God and not involved with the feud. The reasons he chooses to let them is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay